Literature DB >> 19191763

Effect of comorbidity adjustment on CMS criteria for kidney transplant center performance.

E D Weinhandl1, J J Snyder, A K Israni, B L Kasiske.   

Abstract

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) uses kidney transplant outcomes, unadjusted for standard comorbidity, to identify centers with sufficiently higher than expected rates of graft failure or patient death (underperforming centers) that they may be denied Medicare participation. To examine whether comorbidity adjustment would affect this determination, we identified centers that would have failed to meet 1-year graft survival criteria, 1992-2005, with and without adjustment using the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Adjustment was performed for each U.S. center for 24 consecutive (overlapping) 30-month intervals, including 102 176 adult deceased-donor and living-donor kidney transplant patients with Medicare as primary payer 6 months pretransplant. For each interval, we determined percent positive agreement (PPA) (number of centers underperforming both before and after adjustment, divided by number underperforming either before or after adjustment). Overall PPA was 80.8%, with no evidence of a trend over time. Among deceased-donor recipients, 10 of 31 comorbid conditions were predictors of graft failure in at least half of the intervals, as were six conditions among living-donor recipients. Lack of comorbidity adjustment may disadvantage centers willing to accept higher risk patients. Risk of jeopardizing Medicare funding may give centers incentive to deny transplantation to higher risk patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19191763      PMCID: PMC2670063          DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02527.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  22 in total

1.  Does date stamping ICD-9-CM codes increase the value of clinical information in administrative data?

Authors:  Laurent G Glance; Andrew W Dick; Turner M Osler; Dana B Mukamel
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Medicare program; hospital conditions of participation: requirements for approval and re-approval of transplant centers to perform organ transplants. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2007-03-30

3.  SRTR program-specific reports on outcomes: a guide for the new reader.

Authors:  D M Dickinson; C J Arrington; G Fant; G N Levine; D E Schaubel; T L Pruett; M S Roberts; R A Wolfe
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Comorbid conditions in kidney transplantation: association with graft and patient survival.

Authors:  Christine Wu; Idris Evans; Raymond Joseph; Ron Shapiro; Henkie Tan; Amit Basu; Cynthia Smetanka; Ahktar Khan; Jerry McCauley; Mark Unruh
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  Accuracy of ICD-9-CM codes for identifying cardiovascular and stroke risk factors.

Authors:  Elena Birman-Deych; Amy D Waterman; Yan Yan; David S Nilasena; Martha J Radford; Brian F Gage
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Assessing and using comorbidity measures in elderly veterans with lower extremity amputations.

Authors:  Jibby E Kurichi; Margaret G Stineman; Pui L Kwong; Barbara E Bates; Dean M Reker
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 5.140

7.  Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.

Authors:  Hude Quan; Vijaya Sundararajan; Patricia Halfon; Andrew Fong; Bernard Burnand; Jean-Christophe Luthi; L Duncan Saunders; Cynthia A Beck; Thomas E Feasby; William A Ghali
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Baseline comorbidity in kidney transplant recipients: a comparison of comorbidity indices.

Authors:  Sarbjit V Jassal; Douglas E Schaubel; Stanley S A Fenton
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 8.860

9.  In search of the perfect comorbidity measure for use with administrative claims data: does it exist?

Authors:  Laura-Mae Baldwin; Carrie N Klabunde; Pam Green; William Barlow; George Wright
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  The association of candidate mortality rates with kidney transplant outcomes and center performance evaluations.

Authors:  Jesse D Schold; Titte R Srinivas; Richard J Howard; Ian R Jamieson; Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  How should we use age to ration health care? Lessons from the case of kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Peter P Reese; Arthur L Caplan; Roy D Bloom; Peter L Abt; Jason H Karlawish
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 5.562

2.  Considering potential benefits and consequences of hospital report cards: what are the next steps?

Authors:  Jesse D Schold; Lauren Hersch Nicholas
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Building an Ideal Quality Metric for ESRD Health Care Delivery.

Authors:  Jesse D Schold; Laura D Buccini; Michael P Phelan; Colleen L Jay; David A Goldfarb; Emilio D Poggio; John R Sedor
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease among Older Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Mara A McAdams-DeMarco; Sunjae Bae; Nadia Chu; Alden L Gross; Charles H Brown; Esther Oh; Paul Rosenberg; Karin J Neufeld; Ravi Varadhan; Marilyn Albert; Jeremy Walston; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  Impact of comorbidity on outcome in kidney transplant recipients: a retrospective study in Italy.

Authors:  Fabio Fabbian; Alfredo De Giorgi; Fabio Manfredini; Nicola Lamberti; Silvia Forcellini; Alda Storari; Paola Todeschini; Massimo Gallerani; Gaetano La Manna; Dimitri P Mikhailidis; Roberto Manfredini
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.397

6.  Potential Implications of Recent and Proposed Changes in the Regulatory Oversight of Solid Organ Transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  B L Kasiske; N Salkowski; A Wey; A K Israni; J J Snyder
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Sequelae of early hospital readmission after kidney transplantation.

Authors:  M A McAdams-Demarco; M E Grams; E King; N M Desai; D L Segev
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  The association of discharge decisions after deceased donor kidney transplantation with the risk of early readmission: Results from the deceased donor study.

Authors:  Meera Nair Harhay; Yaqi Jia; Heather Thiessen-Philbrook; Behdad Besharatian; Ramnika Gumber; Francis L Weng; Isaac E Hall; Mona Doshi; Bernd Schroppel; Chirag R Parikh; Peter P Reese
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 2.863

9.  Seeking new answers to old questions about public reporting of transplant program performance in the United States.

Authors:  Bertram L Kasiske; Andrew Wey; Nicholas Salkowski; David Zaun; Cory R Schaffhausen; Ajay K Israni; Jon J Snyder
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  The prognostic value of kidney transplant center report cards.

Authors:  J D Schold; L D Buccini; E L G Heaphy; D A Goldfarb; A R Sehgal; J Fung; E D Poggio; M W Kattan
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 8.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.