Literature DB >> 24837380

Influence of DNA extraction method, 16S rRNA targeted hypervariable regions, and sample origin on microbial diversity detected by 454 pyrosequencing in marine chemosynthetic ecosystems.

Perrine Cruaud, Adrien Vigneron, Céline Lucchetti-Miganeh, Pierre Emmanuel Ciron, Anne Godfroy, Marie-Anne Cambon-Bonavita.   

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) opens up exciting possibilities for improving our knowledge of environmental microbial diversity, allowing rapid and cost-effective identification of both cultivated and uncultivated microorganisms. However, library preparation, sequencing, and analysis of the results can provide inaccurate representations of the studied community compositions. Therefore, all these steps need to be taken into account carefully. Here we evaluated the effects of DNA extraction methods, targeted 16S rRNA hypervariable regions, and sample origins on the diverse microbes detected by 454 pyrosequencing in marine cold seep and hydrothermal vent sediments. To assign the reads with enough taxonomic precision, we built a database with about 2,500 sequences from Archaea and Bacteria from deep-sea marine sediments, affiliated according to reference publications in the field. Thanks to statistical and diversity analyses as well as inference of operational taxonomic unit (OTU) networks, we show that (i) while DNA extraction methods do not seem to affect the results for some samples, they can lead to dramatic changes for others; and (ii) the choice of amplification and sequencing primers also considerably affects the microbial community detected in the samples. Thereby, very different proportions of pyrosequencing reads were obtained for some microbial lineages, such as the archaeal ANME-1, ANME-2c, and MBG-D and deltaproteobacterial subgroups. This work clearly indicates that the results from sequencing-based analyses, such as pyrosequencing, should be interpreted very carefully. Therefore, the combination of NGS with complementary approaches, such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)/catalyzed reporter deposition (CARD)-FISH or quantitative PCR (Q-PCR), would be desirable to gain a more comprehensive picture of environmental microbial communities.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24837380      PMCID: PMC4148798          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00592-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  83 in total

1.  Population structure and phylogenetic characterization of marine benthic Archaea in deep-sea sediments.

Authors:  C Vetriani; H W Jannasch; B J MacGregor; D A Stahl; A L Reysenbach
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Assessment of bacterial community structure in the deep sub-seafloor biosphere by 16S rDNA-based techniques: a cautionary tale.

Authors:  Gordon Webster; Carole J Newberry; John C Fry; Andrew J Weightman
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.363

3.  RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models.

Authors:  Alexandros Stamatakis
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  A detailed analysis of 16S ribosomal RNA gene segments for the diagnosis of pathogenic bacteria.

Authors:  Soumitesh Chakravorty; Danica Helb; Michele Burday; Nancy Connell; David Alland
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 2.363

Review 5.  Impact of culture-independent studies on the emerging phylogenetic view of bacterial diversity.

Authors:  P Hugenholtz; B M Goebel; N R Pace
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Improved method for the isolation of RNA from plant tissues.

Authors:  J Logemann; J Schell; L Willmitzer
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1987-05-15       Impact factor: 3.365

7.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  N Saitou; M Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Surface Attachment of Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacteria in Soil.

Authors:  A. Aakra; M. Hesselsøe; L.R. Bakken
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.552

9.  Small-Scale DNA Sample Preparation Method for Field PCR Detection of Microbial Cells and Spores in Soil.

Authors: 
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  A novel lineage of proteobacteria involved in formation of marine Fe-oxidizing microbial mat communities.

Authors:  David Emerson; Jeremy A Rentz; Timothy G Lilburn; Richard E Davis; Henry Aldrich; Clara Chan; Craig L Moyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  39 in total

1.  Exploring the Root Microbiome: Extracting Bacterial Community Data from the Soil, Rhizosphere, and Root Endosphere.

Authors:  Tuesday Simmons; Daniel F Caddell; Siwen Deng; Devin Coleman-Derr
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Influence of Eimeria falciformis Infection on Gut Microbiota and Metabolic Pathways in Mice.

Authors:  Guangping Huang; Sixin Zhang; Chunxue Zhou; Xiaoli Tang; Chao Li; Chaoyue Wang; Xinming Tang; Jingxia Suo; Yonggen Jia; Saeed El-Ashram; Zhengquan Yu; Jianping Cai; Nishith Gupta; Xun Suo; Xianyong Liu
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Lipid Profiles From Fresh Biofilms Along a Temperature Gradient on a Hydrothermal Stream at El Tatio (Chilean Andes), as a Proxy for the Interpretation of Past and Present Biomarkers Beyond Earth.

Authors:  Valentine Megevand; Daniel Carrizo; María Ángeles Lezcano; Mercedes Moreno-Paz; Nathalie A Cabrol; Víctor Parro; Laura Sánchez-García
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 6.064

4.  Evidence of active methanogen communities in shallow sediments of the sonora margin cold seeps.

Authors:  Adrien Vigneron; Stéphane L'Haridon; Anne Godfroy; Erwan G Roussel; Barry A Cragg; R John Parkes; Laurent Toffin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Collecting Fecal Samples for Microbiome Analyses in Epidemiology Studies.

Authors:  Rashmi Sinha; Jun Chen; Amnon Amir; Emily Vogtmann; Jianxin Shi; Kristin S Inman; Roberto Flores; Joshua Sampson; Rob Knight; Nicholas Chia
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 6.  Metagenomics: tools and insights for analyzing next-generation sequencing data derived from biodiversity studies.

Authors:  Anastasis Oulas; Christina Pavloudi; Paraskevi Polymenakou; Georgios A Pavlopoulos; Nikolas Papanikolaou; Georgios Kotoulas; Christos Arvanitidis; Ioannis Iliopoulos
Journal:  Bioinform Biol Insights       Date:  2015-05-05

7.  Evaluation of Clinical, Biochemical and Microbiological Markers Related to Dental Caries.

Authors:  Maria D Ferrer; Salvadora Pérez; Aránzazu López Lopez; José Luis Sanz; Maria Melo; Carmen Llena; Alejandro Mira
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Geomicrobiological Heterogeneity of Lithic Habitats in the Extreme Environment of Antarctic Nunataks: A Potential Early Mars Analog.

Authors:  Miguel Ángel Fernández-Martínez; Miriam García-Villadangos; Mercedes Moreno-Paz; Valentin Gangloff; Daniel Carrizo; Yolanda Blanco; Sergi González; Laura Sánchez-García; Olga Prieto-Ballesteros; Ianina Altshuler; Lyle G Whyte; Victor Parro; Alberto G Fairén
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Metagenomic Analysis of Chicken Gut Microbiota for Improving Metabolism and Health of Chickens - A Review.

Authors:  Ki Young Choi; Tae Kwon Lee; Woo Jun Sul
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.509

10.  A Modified SDS-Based DNA Extraction Method for High Quality Environmental DNA from Seafloor Environments.

Authors:  Vengadesh Perumal Natarajan; Xinxu Zhang; Yuki Morono; Fumio Inagaki; Fengping Wang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.