Literature DB >> 27752818

Short-term outcomes of open versus laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer.

Takeshi Nishikawa1, Soichiro Ishihara2, Keisuke Hata2, Koji Murono2, Koji Yasuda2, Kensuke Otani2, Toshiaki Tanaka2, Tomomichi Kiyomatsu2, Kazushige Kawai2, Hiroaki Nozawa2, Hironori Yamaguchi2, Toshiaki Watanabe2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Along with an aging society, the number of elderly patients with colorectal cancer treated with a surgical modality has gradually increased. Our purpose is to verify the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of colorectal cancer in elderly patients.
METHODS: We compared the short-term outcomes of open versus laparoscopic surgery in patients aged 80 years or older with colorectal cancer between 2007 and 2014.
RESULTS: Of 150 elderly colorectal patients, 62 patients received laparoscopic surgery, and 88 patients, open surgery. In the laparoscopic surgery group, two patients were converted to open surgery due to extensive adhesion. The amount of blood loss was smaller in patients treated with laparoscopic surgery than those with open surgery (44.0 ± 86.5 vs. 329.9 ± 482.1 ml, P < 0.01). In the laparoscopic surgery group, days until oral intake (5.3 ± 1.9 vs. 7.0 ± 3.0 days, P < 0.01) and hospital stay (17.2 ± 6.8 vs. 22.0 ± 14.0 days, P < 0.01) were shorter. Morbidity (30.6 vs. 42.0 %) and mortality (1.6 vs. 1.1 %) in laparoscopic and open surgery groups were similar.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer was a safe and less invasive alternative to open surgery, with less blood loss and shorter hospital stay.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; Elderly patients; Laparoscopic surgery; Open surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27752818     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-4921-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  25 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Inoue; Aya Kawamoto; Yoshinaga Okugawa; Junichiro Hiro; Susumu Saigusa; Yuji Toiyama; Toshimitsu Araki; Koji Tanaka; Yasuhiko Mohri; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-03-30

2.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Outcome of laparoscopic versus open resection for rectal cancer in elderly patients.

Authors:  Wei-gen Zeng; Zhi-xiang Zhou; Hui-rong Hou; Jian-wei Liang; Hai-tao Zhou; Zheng Wang; Xing-mao Zhang; Jun-jie Hu
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

5.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Laparoscopic colorectal resection: a safe option for elderly patients.

Authors:  Wai Lun Law; Kin Wah Chu; Peter Hiu Ming Tung
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  J Lujan; G Valero; Q Hernandez; A Sanchez; M D Frutos; P Parrilla
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Laparoscopic versus open resection for transverse colon cancer.

Authors:  Massimiliano Mistrangelo; Marco Ettore Allaix; Paola Cassoni; Giuseppe Giraudo; Simone Arolfo; Mario Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  8 in total

1.  The dark side of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer patients aged 75 years or older.

Authors:  Yih-Jong Chern; Wen-Sy Tsai; Hsin-Yuan Hung; Jinn-Shiun Chen; Reiping Tang; Jy-Ming Chiang; Chien-Yuh Yeh; Yau-Tong You; Pao-Shiu Hsieh; Sum-Fu Chiang; Cheng-Chou Lai; Geng-Pin Lin; Yu-Ren Hsu; Jeng-Fu You
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-07-15       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery in octogenarians with colorectal cancer: a single-institution analysis.

Authors:  Masashi Miguchi; Masanori Yoshimitsu; Keishi Hakoda; Ichiro Omori; Toshihiko Kohashi; Jun Hihara; Hideki Ohdan; Naoki Hirabayashi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Advantage of laparoscopy surgery for elderly colorectal cancer patients without compromising oncologic outcome.

Authors:  Yih-Jong Chern; Hsin-Yuan Hung; Jeng-Fu You; Yu-Jen Hsu; Jy-Ming Chiang; Pao-Shiu Hsieh; Wen-Sy Tsai
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Nomogram for predicting overall survival in colorectal cancer with distant metastasis.

Authors:  Zheng Liu; Yao Xu; Guijun Xu; Vladimir P Baklaushev; Vladimir P Chekhonin; Karl Peltzer; Wenjuan Ma; Xin Wang; Guowen Wang; Chao Zhang
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Decreasing Postoperative Pulmonary Complication Following Laparoscopic Surgery in Elderly Individuals with Colorectal Cancer: A Competing Risk Analysis in a Propensity Score-Weighted Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yih-Jong Chern; Jeng-Fu You; Ching-Chung Cheng; Jing-Rong Jhuang; Chien-Yuh Yeh; Pao-Shiu Hsieh; Wen-Sy Tsai; Chun-Kai Liao; Yu-Jen Hsu
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 6.  Simultaneous curative resection of double colorectal carcinoma with synchronous bilobar liver metastases.

Authors:  Emilio De Raffele; Mariateresa Mirarchi; Dajana Cuicchi; Ferdinando Lecce; Claudio Ricci; Riccardo Casadei; Bruno Cola; Francesco Minni
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2018-10-15

7.  Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly aged over 80 years old versus non-elderly: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yoshitake Ueda; Norio Shiraishi; Takahide Kawasaki; Tomonori Akagi; Shigeo Ninomiya; Hidefumi Shiroshita; Tsuyoshi Etoh; Masafumi Inomata
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.921

8.  Impact of ASA-score, age and learning curve on early outcome in the initiation phase of an oncological robotic colorectal program.

Authors:  Hülya Sarikaya; Tahar Benhidjeb; Sergiu I Iosivan; Theodoros Kolokotronis; Christine Förster; Stephan Eckert; Ludwig Wilkens; Alaa Nasser; Sebastian Rehberg; Martin Krüger; Jan Schulte Am Esch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.