Literature DB >> 24835663

Frontal theta as a mechanism for cognitive control.

James F Cavanagh1, Michael J Frank2.   

Abstract

Recent advancements in cognitive neuroscience have afforded a description of neural responses in terms of latent algorithmic operations. However, the adoption of this approach to human scalp electroencephalography (EEG) has been more limited, despite the ability of this methodology to quantify canonical neuronal processes. Here, we provide evidence that theta band activities over the midfrontal cortex appear to reflect a common computation used for realizing the need for cognitive control. Moreover, by virtue of inherent properties of field oscillations, these theta band processes may be used to communicate this need and subsequently implement such control across disparate brain regions. Thus, frontal theta is a compelling candidate mechanism by which emergent processes, such as 'cognitive control', may be biophysically realized.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERP; cognitive control; computational modeling; frontal cortex; prediction error; theta

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24835663      PMCID: PMC4112145          DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  94 in total

1.  Phase precession of medial prefrontal cortical activity relative to the hippocampal theta rhythm.

Authors:  Matthew W Jones; Matthew A Wilson
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.899

Review 2.  The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.026

Review 3.  Neural syntax: cell assemblies, synapsembles, and readers.

Authors:  György Buzsáki
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  The feedback-related negativity signals salience prediction errors, not reward prediction errors.

Authors:  Deborah Talmi; Ryan Atkinson; Wael El-Deredy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Responses of human anterior cingulate cortex microdomains to error detection, conflict monitoring, stimulus-response mapping, familiarity, and orienting.

Authors:  Chunmao Wang; Istvan Ulbert; Donald L Schomer; Ksenija Marinkovic; Eric Halgren
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Feedback-related negativity codes prediction error but not behavioral adjustment during probabilistic reversal learning.

Authors:  Henry W Chase; Rachel Swainson; Lucy Durham; Laura Benham; Roshan Cools
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Frontal midline theta and N200 amplitude reflect complementary information about expectancy and outcome evaluation.

Authors:  Azadeh Hajihosseini; Clay B Holroyd
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Cingulate-hippocampus coherence and trajectory coding in a sequential choice task.

Authors:  Miguel Remondes; Matthew A Wilson
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  How prediction errors shape perception, attention, and motivation.

Authors:  Hanneke E M den Ouden; Peter Kok; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-11

10.  Common medial frontal mechanisms of adaptive control in humans and rodents.

Authors:  Nandakumar S Narayanan; James F Cavanagh; Michael J Frank; Mark Laubach
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  445 in total

1.  Meditation and the Wandering Mind: A Theoretical Framework of Underlying Neurocognitive Mechanisms.

Authors:  Tracy Brandmeyer; Arnaud Delorme
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-06-29

2.  Dual brain stimulation enhances interpersonal learning through spontaneous movement synchrony.

Authors:  Yafeng Pan; Giacomo Novembre; Bei Song; Yi Zhu; Yi Hu
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Perceptual Salience and Reward Both Influence Feedback-Related Neural Activity Arising from Choice.

Authors:  Bin Lou; Wha-Yin Hsu; Paul Sajda
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Test-retest reliability of resting-state magnetoencephalography power in sensor and source space.

Authors:  María Carmen Martín-Buro; Pilar Garcés; Fernando Maestú
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  Network effects of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Ahmad Alhourani; Michael M McDowell; Michael J Randazzo; Thomas A Wozny; Efstathios D Kondylis; Witold J Lipski; Sarah Beck; Jordan F Karp; Avniel S Ghuman; R Mark Richardson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Effects of Sleep Extension on Inhibitory Control in Children With ADHD: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Amanda Cremone-Caira; Helen Root; Elizabeth A Harvey; Jennifer M McDermott; Rebecca M C Spencer
Journal:  J Atten Disord       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 3.256

7.  The sound and the fury: Late positive potential is sensitive to sound affect.

Authors:  Darin R Brown; James F Cavanagh
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Immediate versus delayed control demands elicit distinct mechanisms for instantiating proactive control.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Janowich; James F Cavanagh
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Electroencephalographic Biomarkers for Treatment Response Prediction in Major Depressive Illness: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Alik S Widge; M Taha Bilge; Rebecca Montana; Weilynn Chang; Carolyn I Rodriguez; Thilo Deckersbach; Linda L Carpenter; Ned H Kalin; Charles B Nemeroff
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 18.112

10.  Decreased event-related theta power and phase-synchrony in young binge drinkers during target detection: An anatomically-constrained MEG approach.

Authors:  A Correas; E López-Caneda; L Beaton; S Rodríguez Holguín; L M García-Moreno; L F Antón-Toro; F Cadaveira; F Maestú; K Marinkovic
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.