Faming Pan1, Weiyu Han2, Xia Wang3, Zhenhua Liu2, Xingzhong Jin3, Benny Antony3, Flavia Cicuttini4, Graeme Jones3, Changhai Ding5. 1. Menzies Research Institute Tasmania, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China Arthritis Research Institute, 1st Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China. 2. Menzies Research Institute Tasmania, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia Department of Orthopedics, 3rd Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. 3. Menzies Research Institute Tasmania, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. 4. Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 5. Menzies Research Institute Tasmania, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia Arthritis Research Institute, 1st Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The infrapatellar fat pad (IPFP) is of uncertain significance for knee osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to describe the longitudinal associations between baseline IPFP maximal area and changes in knee pain, knee cartilage volume and cartilage defects in older adults. METHODS: 356 community-dwelling male and female adults aged 50-80 years were measured at baseline and approximately 2.6 years later. T1-weighted or T2-weighted fat-suppressed MRI was used to assess maximal IPFP area, cartilage volume and cartilage defects at baseline and/or follow-up. Knee pain was assessed by the self-administered Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index questionnaire. RESULTS: After adjustment for confounders, IPFP maximal area in women was significantly and negatively associated with changes in knee pain (β: -0.18 to -0.86 for total knee pain, pain at night while in bed, pain when sitting/lying and pain when standing upright, all p<0.05) but not with other knee pain subscales. IPFP maximal area in women was beneficially associated with change in tibial cartilage volume per annum (β: +1.56% per cm(2) at medial site; +0.86% per cm(2) at lateral site, both p<0.05), but not with change in patellar cartilage volume. Further, it was significantly associated with reduced risks of increases in medial cartilage defects (relative risk: 0·46 at tibial site, relative risk: 0.59 at femoral site; both p<0.05) but not with increases at other sites in women. No significant associations were found in men. CONCLUSIONS: While the associations are not fully consistent, IPFP maximal area appears to have a protective role for knee symptoms and cartilage damage in older female adults. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
BACKGROUND: The infrapatellar fat pad (IPFP) is of uncertain significance for knee osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to describe the longitudinal associations between baseline IPFP maximal area and changes in knee pain, knee cartilage volume and cartilage defects in older adults. METHODS: 356 community-dwelling male and female adults aged 50-80 years were measured at baseline and approximately 2.6 years later. T1-weighted or T2-weighted fat-suppressed MRI was used to assess maximal IPFP area, cartilage volume and cartilage defects at baseline and/or follow-up. Knee pain was assessed by the self-administered Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index questionnaire. RESULTS: After adjustment for confounders, IPFP maximal area in women was significantly and negatively associated with changes in knee pain (β: -0.18 to -0.86 for total knee pain, pain at night while in bed, pain when sitting/lying and pain when standing upright, all p<0.05) but not with other knee pain subscales. IPFP maximal area in women was beneficially associated with change in tibial cartilage volume per annum (β: +1.56% per cm(2) at medial site; +0.86% per cm(2) at lateral site, both p<0.05), but not with change in patellar cartilage volume. Further, it was significantly associated with reduced risks of increases in medial cartilage defects (relative risk: 0·46 at tibial site, relative risk: 0.59 at femoral site; both p<0.05) but not with increases at other sites in women. No significant associations were found in men. CONCLUSIONS: While the associations are not fully consistent, IPFP maximal area appears to have a protective role for knee symptoms and cartilage damage in older female adults. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Knee Osteoarthritis; Osteoarthritis; Outcomes research
Authors: A Ruhdorfer; F Haniel; T Petersohn; J Dörrenberg; W Wirth; T Dannhauer; D J Hunter; F Eckstein Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2017-02-12 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Benedikt J Schwaiger; John Mbapte Wamba; Alexandra S Gersing; Michael C Nevitt; Luca Facchetti; Charles E McCulloch; Thomas M Link Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2017-09-24 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Aarón Leonardo Pogacnik Murillo; Felix Eckstein; Wolfgang Wirth; Daniel Beavers; Richard F Loeser; Barbara J Nicklas; Shannon L Mihalko; Gary D Miller; David J Hunter; Stephen P Messier Journal: Cells Tissues Organs Date: 2017-02-22 Impact factor: 2.481