Literature DB >> 28216313

Between-group differences in infra-patellar fat pad size and signal in symptomatic and radiographic progression of knee osteoarthritis vs non-progressive controls and healthy knees - data from the FNIH Biomarkers Consortium Study and the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

A Ruhdorfer1, F Haniel2, T Petersohn3, J Dörrenberg4, W Wirth5, T Dannhauer6, D J Hunter7, F Eckstein8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine cross-sectional and longitudinal between-group differences of infra-patellar fat pad (IPFP) size and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal from fat-suppressed intermediate-weighted images with clinically relevant symptomatic and radiographic progression of knee osteoarthritis (OA), vs healthy references.
METHODS: We studied 110 case knees (Kellgren-Lawrence Grade [KLG1-3]) with radiographic (≥0.7 mm loss in joint space width [JSW]) and symptomatic progression (≥+9/100 units on the Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC] knee pain subscale) vs 118 control knees without progression from the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) Biomarkers Consortium cohort. We further studied 88 knees from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) healthy reference cohort without (risk factors) of knee OA. The IPFP was manually segmented using baseline and year-2 sagittal fat-suppressed intermediate-weighted spin-echo 3 T MRIs. Baseline measures and longitudinal change in IPFP volume and 3D MRI signal (mean, standard deviation [SD]) were compared between groups.
RESULTS: No statistically significant baseline differences in IPFP volume, 3D MRI signal mean or signal heterogeneity (SD) were observed between progressor and non-progressor OA knees. Yet, the IPFP 3D MRI signal SD, but not its volume, was statistically significantly greater in OA vs healthy knees. No statistically significant 2-year changes in IPFP volume were observed in either group, but the increase in 3D MRI signal heterogeneity (SD) was greater in progressor vs non-progressor knees, and was greater in OA vs healthy knees.
CONCLUSION: Whereas IPFP-related morphometric measures did not statistically significantly differ between groups, a stronger increase in 3D IPFP MRI signal and signal heterogeneity may be associated with radiographic/symptomatic progression of OA, when compared to non-progressive OA or healthy knees.
Copyright © 2017 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Healthy; Infra-patellar fat pad; Intermediate-weighted MRI; Knee osteoarthritis; Knee pain; Progression

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28216313      PMCID: PMC5466837          DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.02.789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  31 in total

1.  Infrapatellar fat pad volume is greater in individuals with patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis and associated with pain.

Authors:  Sallie M Cowan; Harvi F Hart; Stuart J Warden; Kay M Crossley
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  A novel method for assessing signal intensity within infrapatellar fat pad on MR images in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  M Lu; Z Chen; W Han; Z Zhu; X Jin; D J Hunter; C Ding
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 6.576

3.  What comes first? Multitissue involvement leading to radiographic osteoarthritis: magnetic resonance imaging-based trajectory analysis over four years in the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  Frank W Roemer; C Kent Kwoh; Michael J Hannon; David J Hunter; Felix Eckstein; Tomoko Fujii; Robert M Boudreau; Ali Guermazi
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 10.995

4.  Impact of obesity and knee osteoarthritis on morbidity and mortality in older Americans.

Authors:  Elena Losina; Rochelle P Walensky; William M Reichmann; Holly L Holt; Hanna Gerlovin; Daniel H Solomon; Joanne M Jordan; David J Hunter; Lisa G Suter; Alexander M Weinstein; A David Paltiel; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  The infrapatellar fat pad of patients with osteoarthritis has an inflammatory phenotype.

Authors:  I R Klein-Wieringa; M Kloppenburg; Y M Bastiaansen-Jenniskens; E Yusuf; J C Kwekkeboom; H El-Bannoudi; R G H H Nelissen; A Zuurmond; V Stojanovic-Susulic; G J V M Van Osch; R E M Toes; A Ioan-Facsinay
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Signal intensity alteration in the infrapatellar fat pad at baseline for the prediction of knee symptoms and structure in older adults: a cohort study.

Authors:  Weiyu Han; Dawn Aitken; Zhaohua Zhu; Andrew Halliday; Xia Wang; Benny Antony; Flavia Cicuttini; Graeme Jones; Changhai Ding
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance imaging of Hoffa's fat pad and relevance for osteoarthritis research: a narrative review.

Authors:  F W Roemer; M Jarraya; D T Felson; D Hayashi; M D Crema; D Loeuille; A Guermazi
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  Semiquantitative Imaging Biomarkers of Knee Osteoarthritis Progression: Data From the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Osteoarthritis Biomarkers Consortium.

Authors:  Jamie E Collins; Elena Losina; Michael C Nevitt; Frank W Roemer; Ali Guermazi; John A Lynch; Jeffrey N Katz; C Kent Kwoh; Virginia B Kraus; David J Hunter
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 10.995

9.  Lateral and medial joint space narrowing predict subsequent cartilage loss in the narrowed, but not in the non-narrowed femorotibial compartment--data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  W Wirth; M Nevitt; M-P Hellio Le Graverand; J Lynch; S Maschek; M Hudelmaier; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  Infrapatellar fat pad in the knee: is local fat good or bad for knee osteoarthritis?

Authors:  Weiyu Han; Shiji Cai; Zhenhua Liu; Xingzhong Jin; Xia Wang; Benny Antony; Yuelong Cao; Dawn Aitken; Flavia Cicuttini; Graeme Jones; Changhai Ding
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 5.156

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of osteoarthritis-recent research developments and future perspective.

Authors:  Daichi Hayashi; Frank W Roemer; Ali Guermazi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Exploring Anatomo-Morphometric Characteristics of Infrapatellar, Suprapatellar Fat Pad, and Knee Ligaments in Osteoarthritis Compared to Post-Traumatic Lesions.

Authors:  Chiara Giulia Fontanella; Elisa Belluzzi; Assunta Pozzuoli; Manuela Scioni; Eleonora Olivotto; Davide Reale; Pietro Ruggieri; Raffaele De Caro; Roberta Ramonda; Emanuele Luigi Carniel; Marta Favero; Veronica Macchi
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-06-09

3.  Deep convolutional neural network for segmentation of knee joint anatomy.

Authors:  Zhaoye Zhou; Gengyan Zhao; Richard Kijowski; Fang Liu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Quantitative volume and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI derived perfusion of the infrapatellar fat pad in patellofemoral pain.

Authors:  Rianne A van der Heijden; Bas A de Vries; Dirk H J Poot; Marienke van Middelkoop; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra; Gabriel P Krestin; Edwin H G Oei
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-01

5.  A pilot study of peripheral blood DNA methylation models as predictors of knee osteoarthritis radiographic progression: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI).

Authors:  Christopher M Dunn; Michael C Nevitt; John A Lynch; Matlock A Jeffries
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Serum adipokines/related inflammatory factors and ratios as predictors of infrapatellar fat pad volume in osteoarthritis: Applying comprehensive machine learning approaches.

Authors:  Hossein Bonakdari; Ginette Tardif; François Abram; Jean-Pierre Pelletier; Johanne Martel-Pelletier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.