Anisha I Patel1, Kenneth Hecht, Karla E Hampton, Jacob M Grumbach, Ellen Braff-Guajardo, Claire D Brindis. 1. At the time of the study, Anisha I. Patel, Jacob M. Grumbach, and Claire D. Brindis were with the Division of Pediatrics and Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco. Kenneth Hecht and Ellen Braff-Guajardo were with California Food Policy Advocates, Oakland. Karla E. Hampton was with Changelab Solutions, Oakland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We examined free drinking water access in schools. METHODS: We conducted cross-sectional interviews with administrators from 240 California public schools from May to November 2011 to examine the proportion of schools that met excellent water access criteria (i.e., location, density, type, maintenance, and appeal of water sources), school-level characteristics associated with excellent water access, and barriers to improvements. RESULTS: No schools met all criteria for excellent water access. High schools and middle schools had lower fountain:student ratios than elementary schools (odds ratio [OR] = 0.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.02, 0.20; OR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.12, 0.70). Rural schools were more likely to offer a nonfountain water source than city schools (OR = 5.0; 95% CI = 1.74, 14.70). Newer schools were more likely to maintain water sources than older schools (OR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.97, 1.00). Schools that offered free water in food service areas increased from pre- to postimplementation of California's school water policy (72%-83%; P < .048). Barriers to improving school water included cost of programs and other pressing concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of the benefits related to school drinking water provision and funding may help communities achieve excellence in drinking water access.
OBJECTIVES: We examined free drinking water access in schools. METHODS: We conducted cross-sectional interviews with administrators from 240 California public schools from May to November 2011 to examine the proportion of schools that met excellent water access criteria (i.e., location, density, type, maintenance, and appeal of water sources), school-level characteristics associated with excellent water access, and barriers to improvements. RESULTS: No schools met all criteria for excellent water access. High schools and middle schools had lower fountain:student ratios than elementary schools (odds ratio [OR] = 0.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.02, 0.20; OR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.12, 0.70). Rural schools were more likely to offer a nonfountain water source than city schools (OR = 5.0; 95% CI = 1.74, 14.70). Newer schools were more likely to maintain water sources than older schools (OR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.97, 1.00). Schools that offered free water in food service areas increased from pre- to postimplementation of California's school water policy (72%-83%; P < .048). Barriers to improving school water included cost of programs and other pressing concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of the benefits related to school drinking water provision and funding may help communities achieve excellence in drinking water access.
Authors: Stephen J Onufrak; Sohyun Park; Joseph R Sharkey; Caitlin Merlo; Wesley R Dean; Bettylou Sherry Journal: J Sch Health Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 2.118
Authors: Anisha I Patel; Laura M Bogart; Kimberly E Uyeda; Homero Martinez; Ritamarie Knizewski; Gery W Ryan; Mark A Schuster Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Cara B Ebbeling; Henry A Feldman; Stavroula K Osganian; Virginia R Chomitz; Sheila J Ellenbogen; David S Ludwig Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Gala D Moreno; Laura A Schmidt; Lorrene D Ritchie; Charles E McCulloch; Michael D Cabana; Claire D Brindis; Lawrence W Green; Emily A Altman; Anisha I Patel Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2020-12-25 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Amelie A Hecht; Jacob M Grumbach; Karla E Hampton; Kenneth Hecht; Ellen Braff-Guajardo; Claire D Brindis; Charles E McCulloch; Anisha I Patel Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2017-09-12 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Nicole Kajons; Michael David; Justine Gowland-Ella; Peter Lewis; Samantha Batchelor Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-06-26 Impact factor: 3.295