Literature DB >> 24832092

Evaluation of the consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems in-center hemodialysis survey.

Robert Wood1, Carly J Paoli2, Ron D Hays3, Gavin Taylor-Stokes4, James Piercy4, Matthew Gitlin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) End Stage Renal Disease Prospective Payment System and Quality Incentive Program requires that dialysis centers meet predefined criteria for quality of patient care to ensure future funding. The CMS selected the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems In-Center Hemodialysis (CAHPS-ICH) survey for the assessment of patient experience of care. This analysis evaluated the psychometric properties of the CAHPS-ICH survey in a sample of hemodialysis patients. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Data were drawn from the Adelphi CKD Disease Specific Program (a retrospective, cross-sectional survey of nephrologists and patients). Selected United States-based nephrologists treating patients receiving hemodialysis completed patient record forms and provided information on their dialysis center. Patients (n=404) completed the CAHPS-ICH survey (comprising 58 questions) providing six scores for the assessment of patient experience of care. CAHPS-ICH item-scale convergence, discrimination, and reliability were evaluated for multi-item scales. Floor and ceiling effects were estimated for all six scores. Patient (demographics, dialysis history, vascular access method) and facility characteristics (size, ratio of patients-to-physicians, nurses, and technicians) associated with the CAHPS-ICH scores were also evaluated.
RESULTS: Item-scale correlations and internal consistency reliability estimates provided support for the nephrologists' communication (range, 0.16-0.71; α=0.81) and quality of care (range, 0.16-0.76; α=0.90) composites. However, the patient information composite had low internal consistency reliability (α=0.55). Provider-to-patient ratios (range, 2.37 for facilities with >36 patients per physician to 2.8 for those with <8 patients per physician) and time spent in the waiting room (3.44 for >15 minutes of waiting time to 3.75 for 5 to <10 minutes) were characteristics most consistently related to patients' perceptions of dialysis care.
CONCLUSIONS: CAHPS-ICH is a potentially valuable and informative tool for the evaluation of patients' experiences with dialysis care. Additional studies are needed to estimate clinically meaningful differences between care providers.
Copyright © 2014 by the American Society of Nephrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAHPS-ICH; hemodialysis; patient experience of care; quality of care; reimbursement

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24832092      PMCID: PMC4046733          DOI: 10.2215/CJN.10121013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1555-9041            Impact factor:   8.237


  14 in total

1.  Assessing cultural perspectives on healthcare quality.

Authors:  Ann D Bagchi; Raquel Af Ursin; Alicia Leonard
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2012-02

2.  Giving voice to the vulnerable: the development of a CAHPS nursing home survey measuring family members' experiences.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Frentzel; Judith A Sangl; Christian T Evensen; Carol Cosenza; Julie A Brown; San Keller; Steven A Garfinkel
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Analysis & commentary. Measuring patient experience as a strategy for improving primary care.

Authors:  Katherine Browne; Deborah Roseman; Dale Shaller; Susan Edgman-Levitan
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Medicare program; end-stage renal disease prospective payment system and quality incentive program; ambulance fee schedule; durable medical equipment; and competitive acquisition of certain durable medical equipment prosthetics, orthotics and supplies. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2011-11-10

5.  Evaluation of the quality of care in the clinical care centers of the National Centers of Excellence in Women's Health.

Authors:  Roger T Anderson; Carol S Weisman; Sarah Hudson Scholle; Jillian T Henderson; Robert Oldendick; Fabian Camacho
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec

6.  Real-world physician and patient behaviour across countries: Disease-Specific Programmes - a means to understand.

Authors:  P Anderson; M Benford; N Harris; M Karavali; J Piercy
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 2.580

7.  Medicare program; end-stage renal disease prospective payment system, quality incentive program, and durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2013-12-02

8.  Nursing: a key to patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Ann Kutney-Lee; Matthew D McHugh; Douglas M Sloane; Jeannie P Cimiotti; Linda Flynn; Donna Felber Neff; Linda H Aiken
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  The effect of performance-based financial incentives on improving patient care experiences: a statewide evaluation.

Authors:  Hector P Rodriguez; Ted von Glahn; Marc N Elliott; William H Rogers; Dana Gelb Safran
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Experiences of care among Medicare beneficiaries with ESRD: Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey results.

Authors:  Charlotte A M Paddison; Marc N Elliott; Amelia M Haviland; Donna O Farley; Georgios Lyratzopoulos; Katrin Hambarsoomian; Jacob W Dembosky; Martin O Roland
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 8.860

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  A Thematic Synthesis of the Experiences of Adults Living with Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Claire Reid; Julie Seymour; Colin Jones
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Incentives for caution: the in-center hemodialysis consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems survey and experience of care.

Authors:  Ezra Gabbay; Klemens B Meyer
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Differential item functioning of the CAHPS® In-Center Hemodialysis Survey.

Authors:  Claude M Setodji; John D Peipert; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Satisfaction with Care of Patients on Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Michelle M Richardson; Susan S Paine; Megan E Grobert; Christine A Stidley; Ezra Gabbay; Antonia M Harford; Philip G Zager; Dana C Miskulin; Klemens B Meyer
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 5.  Measuring patient experience in dialysis: a new paradigm of quality assessment.

Authors:  Connie M Rhee; Steven M Brunelli; Lalita Subramanian; Francesca Tentori
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.902

6.  Development and evaluation of the CAHPS (Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) survey for in-center hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Beverly A Weidmer; Paul D Cleary; San Keller; Christian Evensen; Margarita P Hurtado; Beth Kosiak; Patricia M Gallagher; Roger Levine; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 8.860

7.  The Relationship Between Primary Care Physician Burnout and Patient-Reported Care Experiences: a Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Sukyung Chung; Ellis C Dillon; Amy E Meehan; Robert Nordgren; Dominick L Frosch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Patient-Reported Experiences of Dialysis Care Within a National Pay-for-Performance System.

Authors:  Brian M Brady; Bo Zhao; Jingbo Niu; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Arnold Milstein; Glenn M Chertow; Kevin F Erickson
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  Patient Satisfaction Is Associated With Dialysis Facility Quality and Star Ratings.

Authors:  Abhijit V Kshirsagar; Amir Alishahi Tabriz; Heejung Bang; Shoou-Yih D Lee
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 1.852

10.  Measuring Patient Experience with Home Dialysis in the United States.

Authors:  Brian M Brady; Manjula Kurella Tamura
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 8.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.