Robert Wood1, Carly J Paoli2, Ron D Hays3, Gavin Taylor-Stokes4, James Piercy4, Matthew Gitlin2. 1. Adelphi Real World Ltd., Bollington, Cheshire, United Kingdom; robert.wood@adelphigroup.com. 2. Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, California; and. 3. Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California. 4. Adelphi Real World Ltd., Bollington, Cheshire, United Kingdom;
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) End Stage Renal Disease Prospective Payment System and Quality Incentive Program requires that dialysis centers meet predefined criteria for quality of patient care to ensure future funding. The CMS selected the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems In-Center Hemodialysis (CAHPS-ICH) survey for the assessment of patient experience of care. This analysis evaluated the psychometric properties of the CAHPS-ICH survey in a sample of hemodialysis patients. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Data were drawn from the Adelphi CKD Disease Specific Program (a retrospective, cross-sectional survey of nephrologists and patients). Selected United States-based nephrologists treating patients receiving hemodialysis completed patient record forms and provided information on their dialysis center. Patients (n=404) completed the CAHPS-ICH survey (comprising 58 questions) providing six scores for the assessment of patient experience of care. CAHPS-ICH item-scale convergence, discrimination, and reliability were evaluated for multi-item scales. Floor and ceiling effects were estimated for all six scores. Patient (demographics, dialysis history, vascular access method) and facility characteristics (size, ratio of patients-to-physicians, nurses, and technicians) associated with the CAHPS-ICH scores were also evaluated. RESULTS: Item-scale correlations and internal consistency reliability estimates provided support for the nephrologists' communication (range, 0.16-0.71; α=0.81) and quality of care (range, 0.16-0.76; α=0.90) composites. However, the patient information composite had low internal consistency reliability (α=0.55). Provider-to-patient ratios (range, 2.37 for facilities with >36 patients per physician to 2.8 for those with <8 patients per physician) and time spent in the waiting room (3.44 for >15 minutes of waiting time to 3.75 for 5 to <10 minutes) were characteristics most consistently related to patients' perceptions of dialysis care. CONCLUSIONS: CAHPS-ICH is a potentially valuable and informative tool for the evaluation of patients' experiences with dialysis care. Additional studies are needed to estimate clinically meaningful differences between care providers.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) End Stage Renal Disease Prospective Payment System and Quality Incentive Program requires that dialysis centers meet predefined criteria for quality of patient care to ensure future funding. The CMS selected the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems In-Center Hemodialysis (CAHPS-ICH) survey for the assessment of patient experience of care. This analysis evaluated the psychometric properties of the CAHPS-ICH survey in a sample of hemodialysis patients. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Data were drawn from the Adelphi CKD Disease Specific Program (a retrospective, cross-sectional survey of nephrologists and patients). Selected United States-based nephrologists treating patients receiving hemodialysis completed patient record forms and provided information on their dialysis center. Patients (n=404) completed the CAHPS-ICH survey (comprising 58 questions) providing six scores for the assessment of patient experience of care. CAHPS-ICH item-scale convergence, discrimination, and reliability were evaluated for multi-item scales. Floor and ceiling effects were estimated for all six scores. Patient (demographics, dialysis history, vascular access method) and facility characteristics (size, ratio of patients-to-physicians, nurses, and technicians) associated with the CAHPS-ICH scores were also evaluated. RESULTS: Item-scale correlations and internal consistency reliability estimates provided support for the nephrologists' communication (range, 0.16-0.71; α=0.81) and quality of care (range, 0.16-0.76; α=0.90) composites. However, the patient information composite had low internal consistency reliability (α=0.55). Provider-to-patient ratios (range, 2.37 for facilities with >36 patients per physician to 2.8 for those with <8 patients per physician) and time spent in the waiting room (3.44 for >15 minutes of waiting time to 3.75 for 5 to <10 minutes) were characteristics most consistently related to patients' perceptions of dialysis care. CONCLUSIONS:CAHPS-ICH is a potentially valuable and informative tool for the evaluation of patients' experiences with dialysis care. Additional studies are needed to estimate clinically meaningful differences between care providers.
Authors: Elizabeth M Frentzel; Judith A Sangl; Christian T Evensen; Carol Cosenza; Julie A Brown; San Keller; Steven A Garfinkel Journal: Med Care Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Roger T Anderson; Carol S Weisman; Sarah Hudson Scholle; Jillian T Henderson; Robert Oldendick; Fabian Camacho Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2002 Nov-Dec
Authors: Ann Kutney-Lee; Matthew D McHugh; Douglas M Sloane; Jeannie P Cimiotti; Linda Flynn; Donna Felber Neff; Linda H Aiken Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2009-06-12 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Hector P Rodriguez; Ted von Glahn; Marc N Elliott; William H Rogers; Dana Gelb Safran Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2009-10-14 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Charlotte A M Paddison; Marc N Elliott; Amelia M Haviland; Donna O Farley; Georgios Lyratzopoulos; Katrin Hambarsoomian; Jacob W Dembosky; Martin O Roland Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Michelle M Richardson; Susan S Paine; Megan E Grobert; Christine A Stidley; Ezra Gabbay; Antonia M Harford; Philip G Zager; Dana C Miskulin; Klemens B Meyer Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-06-30 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Beverly A Weidmer; Paul D Cleary; San Keller; Christian Evensen; Margarita P Hurtado; Beth Kosiak; Patricia M Gallagher; Roger Levine; Ron D Hays Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2014-07-03 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Sukyung Chung; Ellis C Dillon; Amy E Meehan; Robert Nordgren; Dominick L Frosch Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-03-23 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Brian M Brady; Bo Zhao; Jingbo Niu; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Arnold Milstein; Glenn M Chertow; Kevin F Erickson Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 21.873