Literature DB >> 29998365

Phase Ib trial combining capecitabine, erlotinib and bevacizumab in pancreatic adenocarcinoma - REBECA trial.

Christian Dittrich1,2, Robert Königsberg3,4, Martina Mittlböck5, Klaus Geissler6, Azra Sahmanovic-Hrgovcic7, Johannes Pleiner-Duxneuner8, Martin Czejka7, Philipp Buchner7.   

Abstract

Background Purpose of this phase Ib trial was to establish the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of capecitabine and to escalate the dosages of erlotinib and bevacizumab to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) in patients with advanced/metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma not pretreated for metastatic disease. Methods Starting doses were capecitabine 500 mg/m2 bid orally continuously, erlotinib 100 mg orally daily, and bevacizumab 5 mg/kg intravenously q 2 weeks. Dose escalation was performed according to a 3 + 3 design for capecitabine until MTD, for erlotinib and bevacizumab until the maximum doses registered by applying a substance-related, toxicity-based scheme accompanied by pharmacokinetic analysis. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were determined pretherapeutically by immunohistochemical identification after enrichment with immunomagnetic separation. Results Thirty patients were evaluable at six dose levels. 900 mg/m2 bid were determined as MTD for capecitabine based on dose-limiting toxicities: cutaneous in two patients and vascular in another. The most severe (Grade (G)3/4) drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (toxicities) belonged to the categories gastrointestinal, vascular, cutaneous, cardiovascular, metabolic/nutritional or hematological. G3 toxicities occurred in 14 (47%), G3 + G4 in a single (3%) patient. 2 out of 28 patients (7%) exerted partial response, 17 (61%) stable disease. Pharmacokinetic evaluation revealed lack of drug-drug interaction between capecitabine and erlotinib and their metabolites. Presence of CTCs was associated with shorter progression-free survival (p = 0.009). Conclusions The study met the primary objective. RP2D was capecitabine 800 mg/m2 bid continuously, erlotinib 150 mg daily, and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg q 2 weeks. The regimen could be applied safely, but demonstrated limited efficacy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bevacizumab; Capecitabine; Erlotinib; Locally advanced / metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma; Pharmacokinetics; Phase Ib

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29998365     DOI: 10.1007/s10637-018-0639-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest New Drugs        ISSN: 0167-6997            Impact factor:   3.850


  55 in total

1.  Combination chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer: time to raise the white flag?

Authors:  Stephen A Welch; Malcolm J Moore
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Circulating tumor cells in metastatic colorectal cancer: efficacy and feasibility of different enrichment methods.

Authors:  Robert Königsberg; Margit Gneist; Daniela Jahn-Kuch; Georg Pfeiler; Gudrun Hager; Marcus Hudec; Christian Dittrich; Robert Zeillinger
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 8.679

3.  Antiangiogenic and antitumor activity of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor C225 monoclonal antibody in combination with vascular endothelial growth factor antisense oligonucleotide in human GEO colon cancer cells.

Authors:  F Ciardiello; R Bianco; V Damiano; G Fontanini; R Caputo; G Pomatico; S De Placido; A R Bianco; J Mendelsohn; G Tortora
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Prognostic role of circulating tumor cells in patients with pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xue-Lei Ma; Yan-Yan Li; Jing Zhang; Jing-Wen Huang; Hong-Yuan Jia; Lei Liu; Ping Li
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2014

5.  VEGF pathway genetic variants as biomarkers of treatment outcome with bevacizumab: an analysis of data from the AViTA and AVOREN randomised trials.

Authors:  Diether Lambrechts; Bart Claes; Paul Delmar; Joke Reumers; Massimiliano Mazzone; Betül T Yesilyurt; Roland Devlieger; Chris Verslype; Sabine Tejpar; Hans Wildiers; Sanne de Haas; Peter Carmeliet; Stefan J Scherer; Eric Van Cutsem
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 6.  Pancreatic cancer treatment and research: an international expert panel discussion.

Authors:  M A Tempero; J Berlin; M Ducreux; D Haller; P Harper; D Khayat; H-J Schmoll; A Sobrero; E Van Cutsem
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Capecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate with substantial activity in advanced colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase II study.

Authors:  E Van Cutsem; M Findlay; B Osterwalder; W Kocha; D Dalley; R Pazdur; J Cassidy; L Dirix; C Twelves; D Allman; J F Seitz; J Schölmerich; H U Burger; J Verweij
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Pancreatic Cancer Genomes: Implications for Clinical Management and Therapeutic Development.

Authors:  Stephan B Dreyer; David K Chang; Peter Bailey; Andrew V Biankin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  A phase Ib dose-escalation study of erlotinib, capecitabine and oxaliplatin in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  E Van Cutsem; C Verslype; P Beale; S Clarke; R Bugat; A Rakhit; S H Fettner; U Brennscheidt; A Feyereislova; J-P Delord
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 10.  Pathways for aberrant angiogenesis in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  M Korc
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2003-01-07       Impact factor: 27.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.