Literature DB >> 24824157

A randomised controlled trial of outpatient compared with inpatient cervical ripening with prostaglandin E₂ (OPRA study).

C Wilkinson1, R Bryce, P Adelson, D Turnbull.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical outcomes from outpatient with inpatient cervical prostaglandin E2 ripening for low risk labour induction.
DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial.
SETTING: Two tertiary hospitals in Adelaide, Australia. POPULATION: Women with uncomplicated term pregnancies, scheduled for induction of labour for reasons of post-dates or for social reasons.
METHODS: Eight hundred and twenty-seven women were randomised at induction decision to an outpatient or inpatient group. All women had CTG monitoring before and after vaginal PgE2 administration. The inpatient women were admitted and the outpatient group was discharged home overnight with instructions to return if labour established or rupture of membranes occurred. Next morning, outpatient women were admitted for rupture of membranes or further ripening. After membrane rupture, both groups received routine care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Oxytocin use, maternal and fetal outcomes, and whether planned outpatient management was achievable.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in oxytocin use (2.5% difference, CI-4.3 to 9.4), caesarean sections (-0.59% difference, CI-6.3 to 5.1), epidural use (1.5% difference, CI-5.1 to 8.2), vaginal delivery within 24 hours (-8.2% difference, CI-17.6 to 1.3) or labour complications. More than half of the randomised women did not receive the intervention as they laboured spontaneously, or did not require ripening. The post-hoc analysis of women who received ripening also indicated no statistically significant differences in the patterns or results, with the exception of outpatient women having a longer mean length of active labour (mean difference 66 minutes, CI 4-128 minutes). Outpatient women who received ripening were diagnosed more frequently with non-reassuring CTG monitoring and hyperstimulation, with less than half of the women going home and remaining home overnight.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated no clinical advantage or disadvantage in prostaglandin E2 outpatient cervical ripening. Uterine stimulation following prostaglandins may preclude a woman from going home or remaining at home overnight and may not be the best agent for outpatient ripening.
© 2014 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical ripening; induction of labour; outpatient ripening; prostaglandin E2

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24824157     DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  11 in total

1.  A Tribute to Nancy C. Chescheir, MD.

Authors:  Dwight J Rouse; Thomas W Riggs; John O Schorge
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  A snapshot of women's and clinicians' perceptions of the double balloon catheter for induction of labor.

Authors:  Sarah Waldron; Hannah Contziu; Olga Aleshin; Hala Phipps
Journal:  Eur J Midwifery       Date:  2022-05-30

3.  Effectiveness of Dinoprostone and Cook's Balloon for Labor Induction in Primipara Women at Term.

Authors:  Hui Du; Na Zhang; Chan-Yun Xiao; Guo-Qiang Sun; Yun Zhao
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2020-10-29

4.  Foley catheter induction of labor as an outpatient procedure.

Authors:  H Kruit; O Heikinheimo; V-M Ulander; A Aitokallio-Tallberg; I Nupponen; J Paavonen; L Rahkonen
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  A comparison of inpatient with outpatient balloon catheter cervical ripening: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Chris Wilkinson; Pamela Adelson; Deborah Turnbull
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Prostaglandin insert dinoprostone versus trans-cervical balloon catheter for outpatient labour induction: a randomised controlled trial of feasibility (PROBIT-F).

Authors:  Amarnath Bhide; Philip Sedgwick; Barbara Barrett; Georgina Cupples; Rose Coates; Rosie Goode; Sandra Linton; Christine McCourt
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2020-08-15

7.  Outpatient Induction of Labor - Are Balloon Catheters an Appropriate Method?

Authors:  Werner Rath; Patrick Stelzl; Sven Kehl
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Home versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Gillian Ml Gyte; Vicky Nogueira Pileggi; Rachel Plachcinski; Alfred O Osoti; Elaine M Finucane
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-08-27

9.  Women's preferences for inpatient and outpatient priming for labour induction: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Kirsten Howard; Karen Gerard; Pamela Adelson; Robert Bryce; Chris Wilkinson; Deborah Turnbull
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  The Abortificient Effects of Hydroalcoholic Extract of Lawsonia Inermis on BALB/c Mice.

Authors:  Ramin Esteki; Sepideh Miraj
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2016-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.