Literature DB >> 33123908

Effectiveness of Dinoprostone and Cook's Balloon for Labor Induction in Primipara Women at Term.

Hui Du1, Na Zhang2, Chan-Yun Xiao2, Guo-Qiang Sun2, Yun Zhao2.   

Abstract

Labor induction is commonly used for achieving successful vaginal delivery. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of dinoprostone and Cook's balloon as labor-inducing agents in primipara women at term. A retrospective cohort study among primipara women was conducted in Hubei Maternity and Child Health Hospital. Basic clinical characteristics were collected. The main outcomes were vaginal delivery rate, cesarean section rate and forceps delivery rate. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes were also compared. Univariate and multivariate analyses were further performed to evaluate the predictors for vaginal delivery within 24 h. A total of 845 eligible primipara women undergoing labor induction were recruited. Of them, 141 women were induced with dinoprostone (dinoprostone group, DG), and 704 with Cook's balloon (Cook's balloon group, CG). Groups were homogeneous except more women with premature rupture of membranes in DG, with gestational hypertension in CG (P<0.05). The vaginal delivery rate within 12 h was 1.98% and 16.52% in CG and DG respectively (P=0.0001). Besides, the vaginal delivery rate within 24 h was 37.62% and 52.26% in CG and DG respectively (P=0.0079). DG showed the lower rate of oxytocin augmentation, artificial rupture of membrane and postpartum hemorrhage and the shorter interval from insertion to active labor than CG (P<0.05). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that abortion history, oxytocin augmentation, artificial rupture of membrane, and obstetric analgesia were independent predictors for vaginal delivery within 24 h. In conclusion, dinoprostone was more effective than Cook's balloon to induce labor and achieve vaginal birth in the sample of primipara women at term.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cook’s balloon; dinoprostone; independent predictors; induction of labor; vaginal delivery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33123908     DOI: 10.1007/s11596-020-2274-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Sci        ISSN: 2523-899X


  22 in total

1.  Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.

Authors:  Francis P J M Vrouenraets; Frans J M E Roumen; Cary J G Dehing; Eline S A van den Akker; Maureen J B Aarts; Esther J T Scheve
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Efficacy and safety of misoprostol, dinoprostone and Cook's balloon for labour induction in women with foetal growth restriction at term.

Authors:  Jorge Duro-Gómez; María Fernanda Garrido-Oyarzún; Ana Belén Rodríguez-Marín; Antonio Jesús de la Torre González; José Eduardo Arjona-Berral; Camil Castelo-Branco
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Evaluation of Propess outcomes for cervical ripening and induction of labour in full-term pregnancy.

Authors:  W Chen; Y Zhou; X Pu; C Xiao
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 4.  Foley catheter or prostaglandin E2 inserts for induction of labour at term: an open-label randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-P trial) and systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Marta Jozwiak; Katrien Oude Rengerink; Mieke L G Ten Eikelder; Maria G van Pampus; Marja G K Dijksterhuis; Irene M de Graaf; Joris A M van der Post; Paulien van der Salm; Hubertina C J Scheepers; Nico Schuitemaker; Jan Willem de Leeuw; Ben W J Mol; Kitty W M Bloemenkamp
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08.

Authors:  Pisake Lumbiganon; Malinee Laopaiboon; A Metin Gülmezoglu; João Paulo Souza; Surasak Taneepanichskul; Pang Ruyan; Deepika Eranjanie Attygalle; Naveen Shrestha; Rintaro Mori; Duc Hinh Nguyen; Thi Bang Hoang; Tung Rathavy; Kang Chuyun; Kannitha Cheang; Mario Festin; Venus Udomprasertgul; Maria Julieta V Germar; Gao Yanqiu; Malabika Roy; Guillermo Carroli; Katherine Ba-Thike; Ekaterina Filatova; José Villar
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  A randomised controlled trial of outpatient compared with inpatient cervical ripening with prostaglandin E₂ (OPRA study).

Authors:  C Wilkinson; R Bryce; P Adelson; D Turnbull
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 7.  Indications for induction of labour: a best-evidence review.

Authors:  E Mozurkewich; J Chilimigras; E Koepke; K Keeton; V J King
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  A comparison of inpatient with outpatient balloon catheter cervical ripening: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Chris Wilkinson; Pamela Adelson; Deborah Turnbull
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Safety of the balloon catheter for cervical ripening in outpatient care: complications during the period from insertion to expulsion of a balloon catheter in the process of labour induction: a systematic review.

Authors:  M Diederen; Jsm Gommers; C Wilkinson; D Turnbull; Bwj Mol
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 6.531

10.  Patterns and Outcomes of Induction of Labour in Africa and Asia: a secondary analysis of the WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Neonatal Health.

Authors:  Joshua P Vogel; João Paulo Souza; A Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Conventional versus modified application of COOK Cervical Ripening Balloon for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Chaoyue Wen; Xuemin Liu; Ying Wang; Jun Wang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-10-02       Impact factor: 3.105

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.