Literature DB >> 24821891

Sociopsychological tailoring to address colorectal cancer screening disparities: a randomized controlled trial.

Anthony Jerant1, Richard L Kravitz, Nancy Sohler, Kevin Fiscella, Raquel L Romero, Bennett Parnes, Daniel J Tancredi, Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola, Christina Slee, Simon Dvorak, Charles Turner, Andrew Hudnut, Francisco Prieto, Peter Franks.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Interventions tailored to sociopsychological factors associated with health behaviors have promise for reducing colorectal cancer screening disparities, but limited research has assessed their impact in multiethnic populations. We examined whether an interactive multimedia computer program (IMCP) tailored to expanded health belief model sociopsychological factors could promote colorectal cancer screening in a multiethnic sample.
METHODS: We undertook a randomized controlled trial, comparing an IMCP tailored to colorectal cancer screening self-efficacy, knowledge, barriers, readiness, test preference, and experiences with a nontailored informational program, both delivered before office visits. The primary outcome was record-documented colorectal cancer screening during a 12-month follow-up period. Secondary outcomes included postvisit sociopsychological factor status and discussion, as well as clinician recommendation of screening during office visits. We enrolled 1,164 patients stratified by ethnicity and language (49.3% non-Hispanic, 27.2% Hispanic/English, 23.4% Hispanic/Spanish) from 26 offices around 5 centers (Sacramento, California; Rochester and the Bronx, New York; Denver, Colorado; and San Antonio, Texas).
RESULTS: Adjusting for ethnicity/language, study center, and the previsit value of the dependent variable, compared with control patients, the IMCP led to significantly greater colorectal cancer screening knowledge, self-efficacy, readiness, test preference specificity, discussion, and recommendation. During the followup period, 132 (23%) IMCP and 123 (22%) control patients received screening (adjusted difference = 0.5 percentage points, 95% CI -4.3 to 5.3). IMCP effects did not differ significantly by ethnicity/language.
CONCLUSIONS: Sociopsychological factor tailoring was no more effective than nontailored information in encouraging colorectal cancer screening in a multiethnic sample, despite enhancing sociopsychological factors and visit behaviors associated with screening. The utility of sociopsychological tailoring in addressing screening disparities remains uncertain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hispanic Americans; colorectal neoplasms; computer-assisted instruction; early detection of cancer; expanded health belief model; health behavior; health care disparities; health education; health promotion; outcome and process assessment (health care); patient acceptance of health care; randomized controlled trial; software

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24821891      PMCID: PMC4018368          DOI: 10.1370/afm.1623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  54 in total

1.  A randomized controlled trial of a tailored interactive computer-delivered intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening: sometimes more is just the same.

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Leona K Bartholomew; Amy McQueen; Judy L Bettencourt; Anthony Greisinger; Sharon P Coan; David Lairson; Wenyaw Chan; S T Hawley; R E Myers
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2011-06

2.  A randomized trial comparing the effect of two phone-based interventions on colorectal cancer screening adherence.

Authors:  Usha Menon; Rhonda Belue; Stéphanie Wahab; Kathryn Rugen; Anita Y Kinney; Peter Maramaldi; Debra Wujcik; Laura A Szalacha
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2011-12

3.  Effectiveness of a web-based colorectal cancer screening patient decision aid: a randomized controlled trial in a mixed-literacy population.

Authors:  David P Miller; John G Spangler; L Doug Case; David C Goff; Sonal Singh; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Changes in risk perceptions in relation to self-reported colorectal cancer screening among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer cases enrolled in a randomized trial.

Authors:  Beth A Glenn; Alison K Herrmann; Catherine M Crespi; Cynthia M Mojica; L Cindy Chang; Annette E Maxwell; Roshan Bastani
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Healthy colon, healthy life: a novel colorectal cancer screening intervention.

Authors:  Judith M E Walsh; Rene Salazar; Tung T Nguyen; Celia Kaplan; Lam Kieu Nguyen; Jimmy Hwang; Stephen J McPhee; Rena J Pasick
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Trends in colorectal cancer test use among vulnerable populations in the United States.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Kathleen A Cronin; Nancy Breen; William R Waldron; Anita H Ambs; Marion R Nadel
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Physician counseling for colorectal cancer screening: impact on patient attitudes, beliefs, and behavior.

Authors:  Joshua J Fenton; Anthony F Jerant; Marlene M von Friederichs-Fitzwater; Daniel J Tancredi; Peter Franks
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.657

Review 8.  Tailored interactive multimedia computer programs to reduce health disparities: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Anthony Jerant; Nancy Sohler; Kevin Fiscella; Becca Franks; Peter Franks
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-12-13

9.  A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change.

Authors:  Paul Krebs; James O Prochaska; Joseph S Rossi
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 10.  Computer-tailored dietary behaviour change interventions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Leonie M Neville; Blythe O'Hara; Andrew J Milat
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2009-03-13
View more
  17 in total

1.  How can we boost colorectal and hepatocellular cancer screening among underserved populations?

Authors:  Melissa Goebel; Amit G Singal; Jesse Nodora; Sheila F Castañeda; Elena Martinez; Chyke Doubeni; Adeyinka Laiyemo; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2015-06

2.  Socio-psychological factors in the Expanded Health Belief Model and subsequent colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Nancy L Sohler; Anthony Jerant; Peter Franks
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-04-08

3.  A randomized controlled trial of a multicomponent, targeted, low-literacy educational intervention compared with a nontargeted intervention to boost colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical testing in community clinics.

Authors:  Stacy N Davis; Shannon M Christy; Enmanuel A Chavarria; Rania Abdulla; Steven K Sutton; Alyssa R Schmidt; Susan T Vadaparampil; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Vani N Simmons; Chukwudi B Ufondu; Chitra Ravindra; Ida Schultz; Richard G Roetzheim; David Shibata; Cathy D Meade; Clement K Gwede
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Evaluation of Interventions Intended to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael K Dougherty; Alison T Brenner; Seth D Crockett; Shivani Gupta; Stephanie B Wheeler; Manny Coker-Schwimmer; Laura Cubillos; Teri Malo; Daniel S Reuland
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Does patient time spent viewing computer-tailored colorectal cancer screening materials predict patient-reported discussion of screening with providers?

Authors:  Mechelle Sanders; Kevin Fiscella; Peter Veazie; James G Dolan; Anthony Jerant
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2016-06-24

6.  Development of a Practical Model for Targeting Patient Decision Support Interventions to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening in Vulnerable Populations.

Authors:  Alison Tytell Brenner; Shivani Gupta; Linda K Ko; Nancy Janz; John M Inadomi
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2016

7.  Randomized Trial of a Computerized Touch Screen Decision Aid to Increase Acceptance of Colonoscopy Screening in an African American Population with Limited Literacy.

Authors:  Sheryl B Ruzek; Sarah Bauerle Bass; Judith Greener; Caitlin Wolak; Thomas F Gordon
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2016-03-03

8.  Urinary and sexual dysfunction rates and risk factors following rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Eyup Duran; Mustafa Tanriseven; Nail Ersoz; Muharrem Oztas; Ismail Hakki Ozerhan; Zafer Kilbas; Sezai Demirbas
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Testing Interventions to Motivate and Educate (TIME): A multi-level intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Jessica L Krok-Schoen; Gregory S Young; Michael L Pennell; Paul L Reiter; Mira L Katz; Douglas M Post; Cathy M Tatum; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2015-01-01

Review 10.  Reducing inequities in colorectal cancer screening in North America.

Authors:  Kathleen M Decker; Harminder Singh
Journal:  J Carcinog       Date:  2014-11-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.