OBJECTIVE: To review the theory and research evidence suggesting that tailored interactive multimedia computer programs (IMCPs) aimed at optimizing patient health behaviors could lessen socio-demographic health disparities. METHODS: Selective critical review of research regarding IMCPs tailored to psychological mediators of behavior and their effects on health behavior and outcomes among socio-demographically disadvantaged patients. RESULTS: Tailored IMCPs can address patient factors (e.g. language barriers, low self-efficacy) and buffer provider (e.g. cognitive bias) and health system (e.g. office visit time constraints) factors that contribute to poor provider-patient communication and, thereby, suboptimal health behaviors. Research indicates disadvantaged individuals' interactions with providers are disproportionately affected by such factors, and that their behaviors respond favorably to tailored information, thus suggesting tailored IMCPs could mitigate disparities. However, no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined this question. The optimal design and deployment of tailored IMCPs for disadvantaged patients also requires further study. CONCLUSION: Preliminary research suggests tailored IMCPs have the potential to reduce health disparities. RCTs designed expressly to examine this issue are warranted. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Many socio-demographic health disparities exist, and there is a dearth of proven disparity-reducing interventions. Thus, if tailored IMCPs were shown to lessen disparities, the public health implications would be considerable.
OBJECTIVE: To review the theory and research evidence suggesting that tailored interactive multimedia computer programs (IMCPs) aimed at optimizing patient health behaviors could lessen socio-demographic health disparities. METHODS: Selective critical review of research regarding IMCPs tailored to psychological mediators of behavior and their effects on health behavior and outcomes among socio-demographically disadvantaged patients. RESULTS: Tailored IMCPs can address patient factors (e.g. language barriers, low self-efficacy) and buffer provider (e.g. cognitive bias) and health system (e.g. office visit time constraints) factors that contribute to poor provider-patient communication and, thereby, suboptimal health behaviors. Research indicates disadvantaged individuals' interactions with providers are disproportionately affected by such factors, and that their behaviors respond favorably to tailored information, thus suggesting tailored IMCPs could mitigate disparities. However, no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined this question. The optimal design and deployment of tailored IMCPs for disadvantaged patients also requires further study. CONCLUSION: Preliminary research suggests tailored IMCPs have the potential to reduce health disparities. RCTs designed expressly to examine this issue are warranted. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Many socio-demographic health disparities exist, and there is a dearth of proven disparity-reducing interventions. Thus, if tailored IMCPs were shown to lessen disparities, the public health implications would be considerable.
Authors: John S Baer; Samuel A Ball; Barbara K Campbell; Gloria M Miele; Eugene P Schoener; Kathlene Tracy Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2006-10-04 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Holly Jimison; Paul Gorman; Susan Woods; Peggy Nygren; Miranda Walker; Susan Norris; William Hersh Journal: Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) Date: 2008-11
Authors: Diane Feeney Mahoney; Barbara J Tarlow; Richard N Jones; Johnny Sandaire Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2002 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Vanessa M Barnabei; John J O'Connor; Nordeana M Nimphius; Robert A Vierkant; Elaine D Eaker Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2008 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Anthony Jerant; Richard L Kravitz; Nancy Sohler; Kevin Fiscella; Raquel L Romero; Bennett Parnes; Daniel J Tancredi; Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola; Christina Slee; Simon Dvorak; Charles Turner; Andrew Hudnut; Francisco Prieto; Peter Franks Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2014 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Ruby Shah; Peter Franks; Anthony Jerant; Mitchell Feldman; Paul Duberstein; Erik Fernandez y Garcia; Ladson Hinton; Lorrie Strohecker; Richard L Kravitz Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-04-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Richard L Kravitz; Peter Franks; Mitchell D Feldman; Daniel J Tancredi; Christina A Slee; Ronald M Epstein; Paul R Duberstein; Robert A Bell; Maga Jackson-Triche; Debora A Paterniti; Camille Cipri; Ana-Maria Iosif; Sarah Olson; Steven Kelly-Reif; Andrew Hudnut; Simon Dvorak; Charles Turner; Anthony Jerant Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-11-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Anthony Jerant; Richard L Kravitz; Kevin Fiscella; Nancy Sohler; Raquel Lozano Romero; Bennett Parnes; Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola; Charles Turner; Simon Dvorak; Peter Franks Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2012-09-15
Authors: Susan M Rawl; Celette Sugg Skinner; Susan M Perkins; Jeffrey Springston; Hsiao-Lan Wang; Kathleen M Russell; Yan Tong; Netsanet Gebregziabher; Connie Krier; Esther Smith-Howell; Tawana Brady-Watts; Laura J Myers; Deborah Ballard; Broderick Rhyant; Deanna R Willis; Thomas F Imperiale; Victoria L Champion Journal: Health Educ Res Date: 2012-08-27
Authors: Anthony Jerant; Paul Duberstein; Richard L Kravitz; Deborah M Stone; Camille Cipri; Peter Franks Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-03-17 Impact factor: 5.128