| Literature DB >> 24819926 |
María Arróniz-Crespo1, Sergio Pérez-Ortega2, Asunción De Los Ríos2, T G Allan Green3, Raúl Ochoa-Hueso4, Miguel Ángel Casermeiro5, María Teresa de la Cruz5, Ana Pintado6, David Palacios7, Ricardo Rozzi8, Niklas Tysklind9, Leopoldo G Sancho6.
Abstract
Bryophyte establishment represents a positive feedback process that enhances soil development in newly exposed terrain. Further, biological nitrogen (Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24819926 PMCID: PMC4018330 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096081
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Study area and chronosequence description.
(a) Map of the study area at the Cordillera Darwin in the southwestern part of Tierra del Fuego (Chile) showing the location of the south-side (SG) and north-side (NG) glaciers on each side of the mountain range. (b) Four representative sites along north-side glacier and south-side glacier chronosequences at Cordillera Darwin. At both glaciers, the younger site corresponds to bare ground close to the glacier front whereas the older site was covered within Nothofagus forests. Years since deglaciation per site are included in the picture.
Figure 2Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree.
Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree (50% majority rule consensus tree) from alignments of 16S rRNA genes showing the phylogenetic relationships among all OTUs of epiphytic cyanobacteria found on bryophytes collected along the chronosequence in both glacier and sequences with known taxonomy, for Accession numbers (Table S1).
Figure 3Patterns of soil properties and N2 fixation related parameters along chronosequences.
Site characteristics along the chronosequence in the north-side glacier (NG: black circles) with site soil (surface) age of 5, 18, 20, 26, 66 and 80 yrs and south-side glacier (SG: white circles) with site soil (surface) age of 1, 4, 7, 10, 19 and 34 yrs. At both glaciers, the younger site corresponds to bare ground close to the glacier front whereas the older site was covered within Nothofagus forests. Significant changes of parameters along each glacier chronosequence is indicated by *, p<0.05*, p<0.01**, p<0.001*** (Krukall-Wallis test). Different letters indicate significant differences between site ages after Mann–Whitney U-test post-hoc (Bonferroni corrected), bold letters are used for NG. Statistical differences on soil properties and N2 fixation related parameters between the two glacier chronosequences are indicated in the result section.
Figure 4Conditional inference tree of: a) N2 fixation capacity (nmol C2H2 g−1 dm bryo. h−1) and b) cyanobacteria abundances (nmol echinenone/bryophyte cm2) on bryophytes from both glaciers.
Bubbles (nodes) indicate the variable with the strongest effect on the response, best split value, and associated probability (Bonferroni-adjusted α = 0.05). Boxplots (terminal nodes) summarize the rate of N2 fixation (log+1 transformed) or cyanobacteria abundances (log+1 transformed) in cases classified into each terminal node (n). Predictor variables included: bryophyte species identity (species effect), glacier locations (glacier effect) and the stage of ecological succession (sampling site effect). The bryophyte species name and their corresponded number are shown in the table within the graph.
Mean (N = 3) N2 fixation rates (nmol C2H2 g−1 dm bryo. h−1) cyanobacteria abundance (nmol echinenone/bryophyte cm2) and cyanobacteria genera associated with each individual bryophyte species along both glacier chronosequences.
| Mean reduction rate (nmol C2H2 g−1 dm bryo. h−1) | Cyanobacteria abundance (nmol echin. cm−2) | Cyanobacteria identification | ||||
| Glacier | Site | Bryophyte species | Mean | Range | ||
| SG | 1 |
| 283.4 | 55–520 | 51.5 (3.2) |
|
| SG | 2 |
| 270.1 | 70–455 | 53.3 (8.2) |
|
| SG | 4 |
| 86.7 | 43–144 | 30.7 (12.1) |
|
| SG | 5 |
| 81.6 | 49–142 | 40.3 (36.2) |
|
| NG | 3 |
| 63.5 | 33–125 | 8.5 (6.9) |
|
| NG | 4 |
| 59.9 | 30–101 | 37.2 (9.4) | Unidentified Nostocaceae |
| NG | 2 |
| 7.7 | 3–16 | 14.5 (14.5) |
|
| NG | 3 |
| 30.7 | 12–56 | 8.5 (5.3) | Unidentified Nostocaceae |
| NG | 4 |
| 51.6 | 22–80 | 12.4 (7.1) |
|
| SG | 3 |
| 0.0 | 0 | 0.3 (0.3) |
|
| SG | 4 |
| 20.7 | 7–34 | 21.5 (10.7) | Unidentified Nostocaceae |
| SG | 5 |
| 66.6 | 53–75 | 39.4 (19.6) |
|
| NG | 1 |
| 8.7 | 0–26 | 15.8 (15.5) |
|
| NG | 3 |
| 62.8 | 2–151 | 18.8 (9.6) | Unidentified Nostocaceae |
| NG | 3 |
| 52.6 | 3–124 | 17.1 (4.5) |
|
| NG | 2 |
| 1.4 | 0–3 | 11.8 (6.0) |
|
| NG | 3 |
| 6.1 | 1–14 | 0.0 | Unidentified Nostocaceae |
| SG | 3 |
| 25.7 | 25–40 | 12.5 (12.5) |
|
| SG | 4 |
| 18.4 | 9–28 | 19.5 (6.3) | Unidentified Nostocaceae |
| SG | 5 |
| 39.8 | 8–72 | 9.9 (4.9) | Unidentified Nostocaceae |
| NG | 4 |
| 39.2 | 10–98 | 76.5 (22.0) |
|
| NG | 3 |
| 19.2 | 9–33 | 2.7 (2.7) | Unidentified Nostocaceae |
| NG | 5 |
| 2.9 | 0–9 | 5.9 (5.9) |
|
| NG | 5 |
| 3.5 | 0–11 | 5.7 (5.1) |
|
| SG | 4 |
| 1.5 | 0–3 | 15.2 (4.5) |
|
| NG | 2 |
| 0.9 | 0–3 | 2.7 (2.7) |
|
| NG | 5 |
| 0.0 | 0 | 6.1 (6.1) |
|
| SG | 5 |
| 0.0 | 0 | 4.8 (4.8) |
|
| NG | 1 |
| 0.0 | 0 | 3.2 (3.2) |
|
| NG | 2 |
| 0.0 | 0 | 2.5 (2.5) |
|
| NG | 5 |
| 0.0 | 0 | 0.1 (0.1) |
|
In both glaciers the younger site (site 1) correspond to early succession site close to the glacier front whereas the older site (site 5) was settled within Nothofagus forests. Sites 3–4 represent intermediate stages of ecological succession. No species were sampled at site 0. SE for cyanobacteria abundances is shown in brackets. NG: north-side glacier; SG: south-side glacier of the mountain range.
Figure 5Relationship between N2 fixation and the abundance and diversity of epiphytic cyanobacteria.
Relationship between N2 fixation (µg N g−1 DW bryo. d−1) on each individual bryophyte species and the abundance (nmol echine. cm-2) and diversity (Shannon Index) of their host cyanobacteria. Bryophyte species from both glaciers are included. The results of the linear regression analysis are shown in the upper left side of the figure.
Figure 6Relationships between cyanobacteria and the stages of ecological succession.
Relationships between OTUs of epiphytic cyanobacteria obtained at a 0.01% cut-off and the different stages of ecological succession (triangles) -the younger site (site 1) correspond to bare ground close to the glacier front whereas the older site (site 5) correspond to Nothofagus forests- in the north-side glacier (a) and south-side glacier (b) after correspondence analysis. Site 1 is not included in (a) because cyanobacteria were not found epiphytically on bryophytes at that site. For OTUs identification please see Fig. 2.