| Literature DB >> 24819889 |
Benjamin Leon Bodirsky1, Alexander Popp2, Hermann Lotze-Campen2, Jan Philipp Dietrich2, Susanne Rolinski2, Isabelle Weindl2, Christoph Schmitz2, Christoph Müller2, Markus Bonsch2, Florian Humpenöder2, Anne Biewald2, Miodrag Stevanovic2.
Abstract
Reactive nitrogen (Nr) is an indispensable nutrient for agricultural production and human alimentation. Simultaneously, agriculture is the largest contributor to Nr pollution, causing severe damages to human health and ecosystem services. The trade-off between food availability and Nr pollution can be attenuated by several key mitigation options, including Nr efficiency improvements in crop and animal production systems, food waste reduction in households and lower consumption of Nr-intensive animal products. However, their quantitative mitigation potential remains unclear, especially under the added pressure of population growth and changes in food consumption. Here we show by model simulations, that under baseline conditions, Nr pollution in 2050 can be expected to rise to 102-156% of the 2010 value. Only under ambitious mitigation, does pollution possibly decrease to 36-76% of the 2010 value. Air, water and atmospheric Nr pollution go far beyond critical environmental thresholds without mitigation actions. Even under ambitious mitigation, the risk remains that thresholds are exceeded.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24819889 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4858
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919