| Literature DB >> 35805502 |
Pan Rao1, Xiaojin Liu1, Shubin Zhu2, Xiaolan Kang2, Xinglei Zhao1, Fangting Xie3,4.
Abstract
Based on the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis, this paper examines whether rural broadband adoption affects agricultural carbon reduction efficiency (ACRE), using panel data from 30 Chinese provinces from 2011 to 2019. This paper achieves a measurement of ACRE by taking the carbon sink of agricultural as one of the desired outputs and using a Slacks-Based Measure (SBM) model and the global Malmquist-Luenberger (GML) index. The results show that: (1) Rural broadband adoption has a positive effect on ACRE. The relationship between the income of rural residents and ACRE was an inverted U-shaped, which confirms the EKC hypothesis. (2) Land transfer has a significant promoting effect on the relationship between rural broadband adoption and ACRE. When the land transfer rate is high, the positive effect of broadband adoption is obvious. (3) The positive effect of broadband adoption on ACRE was more obvious when farmers invested more in production equipment, that is to say, it has a significant positive moderating effect. As farmers in many developing countries suffer from increasingly frequent and severe extreme weather events, we believe that the results of this study also have implications for the implementation of agricultural carbon reduction and smart agricultural equipment roll-out in many countries.Entities:
Keywords: agricultural carbon reduction efficiency; broadband adoption; moderating effects; rural China
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35805502 PMCID: PMC9265305 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19137844
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1Theoretical model of this study.
Agricultural carbon reduction efficiency measurement index system.
| Type | Indicator Abbreviations | Indicator Index |
|---|---|---|
| Input indicators | Labor input | Number of First-born Employees (10,000 persons) |
| Land input | Agricultural Sown Area (1000 Ha) | |
| Mechanical input | Total power of agricultural machinery (10,000 kW) | |
| Fertilizer input | Application amount of agricultural chemical fertilizer (10,000 tons) | |
| Pesticide input | Pesticide usage (10,000 tons) | |
| Plastic film input | Plastic film usage (10,000 tons) | |
| Irrigation input | Effective irrigation Area (1000 Ha) | |
| Output indicators | Desirable output | Gross output value of Agriculture, Forestry, Animal Husbandry and Fishery (100 million Yuan) |
| Agricultural carbon sink (10,000 tons) | ||
| Undesirable output | Agricultural CO2 Emissions (10,000 tons) |
Variables definition.
| Variable Name | Symbol | Variable Definition |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural carbon reduction efficiency | ACRE | Accumulated value of carbon reduction efficiency of regional agriculture |
| Rural broadband adoption |
| Ratio of regional rural broadband users to regional total users |
| Rural household computer penetration rate |
| Rural household computer penetration rate, that is, per 100 households computer ownership (sets/100 persons) |
| rural disposable income |
| Natural logarithm of rural per capita disposable income |
| rural disposable income square |
| Natural logarithm of rural per capita disposable income square |
| Operation scale |
| Sown area/total labor in planting industry (hectares/person) |
| Agricultural economic status |
| Location quotient: The ratio of the agricultural output value to the national agricultural output value divided by the ratio of the gross product of the province to the national gross product |
| Industrial added value |
| Natural logarithm of industrial added value |
| Ratio of disaster |
| Ratio of disaster area to sown area |
| Land transfer |
| Ratio of circulation area to household contracted arable land area |
| Equipment investment |
| Ratio of production equipment investment to fixed assets investment of rural households |
Descriptive statistics.
| Variable Symbol | N | Mean | SD | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACRE | 270 | 1.00 | 0.06 | 0.77 | 1.20 |
|
| 270 | 0.22 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.44 |
|
| 270 | 25.33 | 14.45 | 4.04 | 74.70 |
|
| 270 | 9.30 | 0.41 | 8.30 | 10 |
|
| 270 | 87 | 7.60 | 68 | 108 |
|
| 270 | 4.20 | 2.40 | 0.53 | 15 |
|
| 270 | 1.20 | 0.68 | 0.04 | 4.10 |
|
| 270 | 8.80 | 0.97 | 6.20 | 11 |
|
| 270 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.006 | 0.62 |
|
| 270 | 0.31 | 0.16 | 0.03 | 0.87 |
|
| 270 | 0.16 | 0.13 | 0.003 | 0.68 |
Note: 1. See Table 2 for definitions of the Explained variables; 2. One USD was about 6.65 Chinese yuan as of December 2010.
Figure 2Spatial distribution of provincial rural broadband adaption and ACRE. Notes: There are four labels: (a–d).
Rural broadband adoption and agricultural carbon reduction efficiency.
| (1) | (2) | (3) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACRE | ACRE | ACRE | |
|
| 0.201 ** | 0.111 ** | 0.210 ** |
| (2.30) | (2.30) | (2.42) | |
|
| −0.889 *** | −0.608 *** | −1.101 *** |
| (−2.87) | (−3.12) | (−3.62) | |
|
| 0.047 *** | 0.032 *** | 0.057 *** |
| (2.84) | (3.01) | (3.51) | |
|
| 0.004 ** | 0.012 | |
| (2.35) | (1.20) | ||
|
| −0.020 *** | −0.003 | |
| (−3.69) | (−0.25) | ||
|
| −0.005 | −0.014 | |
| (−1.39) | (−0.70) | ||
|
| −0.101 * | −0.137 * | |
| (−1.81) | (−1.73) | ||
| _Cons | 5.163 *** | 3.979 *** | 6.358 *** |
| (3.61) | (4.46) | (4.69) | |
| N | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Province FE | YES | NO | YES |
| Year FE | NO | NO | YES |
| R-squared | 0.033 | 0.127 | 0.085 |
Note: 1. See Table 2 for definitions of the variables; 2. *** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, and * p < 0.1; 3. Robust t-statistics in parentheses.
Robustness analysis: Replacing the main independent variable.
| (4) | |
|---|---|
| ACRE | |
| Computer | 0.011 * |
| (1.92) | |
| Other control variables | Control |
| _Cons | 3.196 * |
| (1.87) | |
| N | 270 |
| Province FE | Yes |
| Year FE | NO |
| R-squared | 0.054 |
Note: 1. See Table 2 for definitions of the variables and other control variables; 2. *** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, and * p < 0.1; 3. Robust t-statistics in parentheses.
Endogeneity problem: The independent variable lag for one period.
| (5) | (6) | |
|---|---|---|
| ACRE | ACRE | |
|
| 0.074 * | 0.093 * |
| (1.78) | (1.69) | |
|
| −0.683 *** | −1.055 ** |
| (−3.23) | (−2.45) | |
|
| 0.035 *** | 0.054 ** |
| (3.09) | (2.31) | |
|
| 0.004 ** | 0.015 |
| (2.51) | (1.12) | |
|
| −0.020 *** | 0.028 |
| (−4.40) | (1.40) | |
|
| −0.003 | −0.012 |
| (−0.76) | (−0.48) | |
|
| −0.105 * | −0.146 |
| (−1.67) | (−1.59) | |
| _Cons | 4.339 *** | 6.168 *** |
| (4.48) | (3.17) | |
| N | 240 | 240 |
| Province FE | Yes | No |
| Year FE | No | No |
| R-squared | 0.061 | 0.021 |
Note: 1. See Table 2 for definitions of the variables; 2. *** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, and * p < 0.1; 3. Robust t-statistics in parentheses.
Endogenous treatment: Lewbel [75].
| (7) | |
|---|---|
| ACRE | |
|
| 0.563 ** |
| (2.20) | |
| Other control variables | Control |
| _Cons | 0.901 *** |
| (6.04) | |
| N | 270 |
| Province FE | Yes |
| Year FE | Yes |
| R-squared | 0.792 |
| First-Stage F-Statistic | 12.399 |
| Sargan Statistic | 16.380 |
| 0.063 |
Note: 1. See Table 2 for definitions of the variables; 2. *** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, and * p < 0.1; 3. Robust t-statistics in parentheses.
Moderating effect results.
| (8) | (9) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ACRE | ACRE | ||
|
| 0.124 ** | Broadband | 0.181 ** |
| (2.13) | (1.85) | ||
|
| 0.019 | Equipment | −0.096 ** |
| (0.92) | (−2.47) | ||
|
| 0.387 * | Broadband•Equipment | 0.475 * |
| (2.01) | (1.68) | ||
|
| −0.810 *** | income | −0.637 *** |
| (−3.72) | (−3.02) | ||
|
| 0.025 *** | income square | 0.024 *** |
| (2.71) | (2.95) | ||
|
| 0.002 | Scale | 0.007 |
| (1.16) | (0.75) | ||
|
| −0.003 | Status | 0.001 |
| (−0.21) | (0.47) | ||
|
| −0.017 | Industrialization | −0.006 |
| (−0.81) | (−1.32) | ||
|
| −0.074 * | Damage | −0.149 * |
| (−1.76) | (−1.98) | ||
| _Cons | 5.916 *** | _Cons | 6.036 *** |
| (4.32) | (3.92) | ||
| N | 270 | N | 270 |
| Province FE | Yes | Province FE | Yes |
| Year FE | Yes | Year FE | Yes |
| R-squared | 0.059 | R-squared | 0.137 |
Note: 1. See Table 2 for definitions of the variables; 2. ***p < 0.01, **p < 0.05, and *p < 0.1; 3. Robust t-statistics in parentheses.
Heterogeneity analysis results.
| (Western) | (Central) | (Eastern) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACRE | ACRE | ACRE | |
|
| 0.197 | 0.089 * | 0.115 * |
| (1.09) | (1.81) | (1.74) | |
| Other control variables | Control | Control | Control |
| _Cons | 3.936 | 4.663 *** | 8.188 * |
| (1.51) | (2.91) | (1.84) | |
| N | 81 | 108 | 81 |
| Province FE | No | No | No |
| Year FE | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| R-squared | 0.221 | 0.057 | 0.047 |
Note: 1. See Table 2 for definitions of the variables; 2. *** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, and * p < 0.1; 3. Robust t-statistics in parentheses.