Literature DB >> 24819329

Two-year urinary outcomes of sacrocolpopexy with or without transobturator tape: results of a prolapse-reduction stress test-based approach.

Myung Jae Jeon1, Ji Young Kim, Yeo Jung Moon, Sang Wook Bai, Eun-Hee Yoo.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Women undergoing sacrocolpopexy (SCP) are at risk for postoperative stress urinary incontinence (SUI). However, the optimal management for this condition remains debatable. The aim of this study was to evaluate urinary outcomes 2 years after SCP with or without transobturator tape (TOT) based on the results of a prolapse-reduction stress test.
METHODS: A prospective, observational study was conducted assessing a cohort of women undergoing SCP. Patients were assigned to the TOT or non-TOT group based on results of a prolapse-reduction stress test. The primary outcome was SUI (defined as a positive cough stress test or bothersome symptoms) or additional surgery for this condition.
RESULTS: Among the 247 women enrolled, 223 (90 %) received surgery per assignment and completed the follow-up. Two years after surgery, 5.4 % of women in the TOT group and 28.6 % in the non-TOT group had SUI or received additional anti-incontinence surgery (p < 0.01). In the non-TOT group, more women with symptoms of SUI prior to surgery had postoperative SUI or received additional anti-incontinence surgery than those without symptoms (42.9 % vs. 20.0 %, p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: A preoperative prolapse-reduction stress test alone is not sufficient to determine the need for anti-incontinence surgery at the time of SCP. In particular, women with symptoms of SUI despite a negative prolapse-reduction stress test are more likely to experience postoperative SUI or additional anti-incontinence surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24819329     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-014-2410-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  18 in total

1.  Predicting postoperative urinary incontinence development in women undergoing operation for genitourinary prolapse.

Authors:  A Bergman; P P Koonings; C A Ballard
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  The value of the vaginal pack test in large cystoceles.

Authors:  G M Ghoniem; F Walters; V Lewis
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Incidence and risk factors of postoperative stress urinary incontinence following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in patients with negative preoperative prolapse reduction stress testing.

Authors:  Julie Leruth; Marc Fillet; David Waltregny
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Prevalence of abnormal urodynamic test results in continent women with severe genitourinary prolapse.

Authors:  B A Rosenzweig; S Pushkin; D Blumenfeld; N N Bhatia
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 5.  Pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  J Eric Jelovsek; Christopher Maher; Matthew D Barber
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-03-24       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Clinical relevance of urodynamic investigation tests prior to surgical correction of genital prolapse: a literature review.

Authors:  Jan-Paul W R Roovers; Matthias Oelke
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-11-22

Review 7.  Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Ingrid E Nygaard; Rebecca McCreery; Linda Brubaker; AnnaMarie Connolly; Geoff Cundiff; Anne M Weber; Halina Zyczynski
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Two-year outcomes after sacrocolpopexy with and without burch to prevent stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Linda Brubaker; Ingrid Nygaard; Holly E Richter; Anthony Visco; Anne M Weber; Geoffrey W Cundiff; Paul Fine; Chiara Ghetti; Morton B Brown
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  The mechanism of urinary continence in women with severe uterovaginal prolapse: results of barrier studies.

Authors:  R C Bump; J A Fantl; W G Hurt
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  A long-term treatment outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Myung Jae Jeon; Yeo Jung Moon; Hyun Joo Jung; Kyung Jin Lim; Hyo In Yang; Sei Kwang Kim; Sang Wook Bai
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 2.759

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Heterogeneity in post-intervention prolapse and urinary outcome reporting: a one-year review of the International Urogynecology Journal.

Authors:  Dobrochna Globerman; Magali Robert
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  The effect of diagnosis-related group payment system on the quality of medical care for pelvic organ prolapse in Korean tertiary hospitals.

Authors:  Myung Jae Jeon; Sung Pil Choo; Young Hwa Kwak; Dong Wook Kim; Eui Hyeok Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.