Literature DB >> 22825418

Incidence and risk factors of postoperative stress urinary incontinence following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in patients with negative preoperative prolapse reduction stress testing.

Julie Leruth1, Marc Fillet, David Waltregny.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the incidence of postoperative stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) in women with negative preoperative prolapse reduction stress testing (PPRST) and to identify associated risk factors.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study comprising women who consecutively underwent double-mesh LSCP without concomitant SUI surgery after a negative PPRST at a tertiary referral center. Negative PPRST was defined by the absence of SUI during cough testing and urodynamic studies with prolapse reduction.
RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were assessed in the final analysis. No significant complication was encountered during and after LSCP. Mean follow-up was 25 ± 11 (range 12-48) months. No patient developed recurrent pelvic organ prolapse (POP) or mesh erosion at last follow-up. Thirty (54.5 %) patients reported the symptom of SUI (subjective SUI) postoperatively, 13 (23.6 %) had a positive cough test (objective SUI) at last visit, and nine (16.4 %) underwent a sling procedure. In univariate analyses, advanced cystocele (stage 3-4) and a history of patient-reported SUI before surgery were associated with a higher risk of postoperative subjective and objective SUI after LSCP. Multivariate analyses identified preoperative SUI as the sole independent predictor of subjective SUI [risk ratio (RR = 4.03; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.16-14.09), objective SUI, (RR = 4.67; 95% CI = 1.14-19.23), and subsequent anti-SUI surgery after LSCP (RR = 6.17; 95% CI = 1.30-29.41).
CONCLUSIONS: SUI is far from uncommon in women after LSCP despite negative PPRST, especially in those with advanced cystocele and a history of SUI preoperatively; after at least 1 year of follow-up, approximately one in six women eventually underwent a sling surgery. These data are useful for counseling patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22825418     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-012-1888-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  15 in total

1.  Relationship between stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  S W Bai; M J Jeon; J Y Kim; K A Chung; S K Kim; K H Park
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2002

2.  Effects of pelvic organ prolapse repair on urinary symptoms: a comparative study between the laparoscopic and vaginal approach.

Authors:  Rajeev Ramanah; Marcos Ballester; Elisabeth Chereau; Roman Rouzier; Emile Daraï
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 2.696

3.  Prevalence of abnormal urodynamic test results in continent women with severe genitourinary prolapse.

Authors:  B A Rosenzweig; S Pushkin; D Blumenfeld; N N Bhatia
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  A L Olsen; V J Smith; J O Bergstrom; J C Colling; A L Clark
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Occult stress incontinence in women with pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  C Reena; A N Kekre; N Kekre
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 3.561

Review 6.  Clinical relevance of urodynamic investigation tests prior to surgical correction of genital prolapse: a literature review.

Authors:  Jan-Paul W R Roovers; Matthias Oelke
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-11-22

Review 7.  An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen; Dirk de Ridder; Robert M Freeman; Steven E Swift; Bary Berghmans; Joseph Lee; Ash Monga; Eckhard Petri; Diaa E Rizk; Peter K Sand; Gabriel N Schaer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Surgical strategies for women with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary stress incontinence.

Authors:  Ellen Borstad; Michael Abdelnoor; Anne Cathrine Staff; Sigurd Kulseng-Hanssen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Managing the urethra at transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair: a urodynamic approach.

Authors:  Katie N Ballert; Grace Y Biggs; Anthony Isenalumhe; Nirit Rosenblum; Victor W Nitti
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Abdominal sacrocolpopexy and urinary incontinence: surgical planning based on urodynamics.

Authors:  Denise M Elser; Michael D Moen; Edward J Stanford; Kristinell Keil; Catherine A Matthews; Neeraj Kohli; Fleming Mattox; Janet Tomezsko
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  11 in total

1.  Laparoscopic pectopexy: a prospective, randomized, comparative clinical trial of standard laparoscopic sacral colpocervicopexy with the new laparoscopic pectopexy-postoperative results and intermediate-term follow-up in a pilot study.

Authors:  Karl-Günter Noé; Sven Schiermeier; Ibrahim Alkatout; Michael Anapolski
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Two-year urinary outcomes of sacrocolpopexy with or without transobturator tape: results of a prolapse-reduction stress test-based approach.

Authors:  Myung Jae Jeon; Ji Young Kim; Yeo Jung Moon; Sang Wook Bai; Eun-Hee Yoo
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  De novo stress urinary incontinence after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in women without occult incontinence.

Authors:  Alexandriah N Alas; Orawee Chinthakanan; Luis Espaillat; Leon Plowright; G Willy Davila; Vivian C Aguilar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Is de novo stress incontinence after sacrocolpopexy related to anatomical changes and surgical approach?

Authors:  Edgar L LeClaire; Marium S Mukati; Dianna Juarez; Dena White; Lieschen H Quiroz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy using barbed sutures for mesh fixation and peritoneal closure: A safe option to reduce operational times.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kallidonis; Abdulrahman Al-Aown; Marinos Vasilas; Iason Kyriazis; Vasilis Panagopoulos; Fotini Fligou; Anastasios Athanasopoulos; Bagheri Fariborz; Evangelos Liatsikos; Mehmet Özsoy
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

6.  Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Chunbo Li; Zhiyuan Dai; Huimin Shu
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 7.  Long-term mesh erosion rate following abdominal robotic reconstructive pelvic floor surgery: a prospective study and overview of the literature.

Authors:  Femke van Zanten; Jan J van Iersel; Tim J C Paulides; Paul M Verheijen; Ivo A M J Broeders; Esther C J Consten; Egbert Lenters; Steven E Schraffordt Koops
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  A web-based fuzzy risk predictive-decision model of de novo stress urinary incontinence in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Authors:  Seyyde Yalda Moosavi; Taha Samad-Soltani; Sakineh Hajebrahimi
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2021-08-09

9.  Severity of Cystocele and Risk Factors of Postoperative Stress Urinary Incontinence after Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Authors:  Hirotaka Sato; Hirokazu Abe; Atsushi Ikeda; Tomoaki Miyagawa; Sachiyuki Tsukada
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2022-02-14

10.  Comparison of the Quality of Life and Female Sexual Function Following Laparoscopic Pectopexy and Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy in Apical Prolapse Patients.

Authors:  Mehmet Obut; Süleyman Cemil Oğlak; Sedat Akgöl
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2021-04-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.