Literature DB >> 24819176

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a hamstring graft: a retrospective comparison of tunnel widening upon use of two different femoral fixation methods.

Musa Ugur Mermerkaya1, Ozgur Ahmet Atay2, Burak Kaymaz3, Senol Bekmez4, Fatih Karaaslan5, Mahmut Nedim Doral2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare femoral and tibial tunnel widening (TW) in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using an interference screw (IS), or an EndoButton-Continuous Loop(®) on the femoral side, and an IS/staple on the tibial side.
METHODS: Between 2006 and 2009, at a single institution, 72 patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with quadrupled hamstring tendon grafting were retrospectively reviewed. Fixation was performed, and with the EndoButton-Continuous Loop(®) device (Group Ι) in 48 patients (mean age 29.1 ± 7.3 years) with a bioabsorbable IS (Group ΙΙ) in 24 patients (mean age 28.5 ± 8.4 years) on the femoral side. Evaluation included standardized anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiography. The diameters of tunnels at the last follow-up visit (at a median time of 17 months postoperatively) were compared to those noted on radiographs taken 1 day postoperatively.
RESULTS: The two groups were similar in terms of age and gender distribution, the operated side, the size of the tunnel created, and the follow-up period (n.s.). Femoral TW at the proximal and middle levels (on both AP and lateral views) in Group ΙΙ was significantly greater than in Group Ι (p < 0.050 for all comparisons). No significant difference in femoral TW at the distal level was evident between the groups, and tibial TW at all levels was similar in both groups (n.s.).
CONCLUSION: Femoral TW is less after EndoButton-Continuous Loop(®) fixation and not reduced after IS fixation. Surgeons should be aware of TW when selecting a fixation device for hamstring graft. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, retrospective comparative study, Level III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24819176     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3034-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  31 in total

1.  Hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of bioabsorbable interference screw and endobutton-post fixation.

Authors:  C Benjamin Ma; Kimberly Francis; Jeffrey Towers; Jay Irrgang; Freddie H Fu; Christopher H Harner
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 2.  Anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation.

Authors:  Scott David Martin; Tamara L Martin; Charles H Brown
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.472

3.  Tibial tunnel area changes following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with autogenous patellar tendon graft.

Authors:  Hyunchul Jo; Deuk Soo Jun; Dong Yeon Lee; Sang Hoon Lee; Sang Cheol Seong; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Femoral tunnel widening after hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bioabsorbable transfix.

Authors:  Nam-Hong Choi; Kyung-Mo Son; Soon-Young Yoo; Brian N Victoroff
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Statistical significance and statistical power in hypothesis testing.

Authors:  R L Lieber
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 6.  Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: fact or fiction?

Authors:  J Höher; H D Möller; F H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Relation of tunnel enlargement and tunnel placement after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Yan Xu; Yingfang Ao; Jianquan Wang; Jiakuo Yu; Guoqing Cui
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 8.  Current concepts in orthopaedic biomaterials and implant fixation.

Authors:  R J Friedman; J Black; J O Galante; J J Jacobs; H B Skinner
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1994

9.  A retrospective review of bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons fixed with a metal round cannulated interference screw in the femur.

Authors:  Masahiko Kobayashi; Yasuaki Nakagawa; Takashi Suzuki; Shuzo Okudaira; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadrupled semitendinosus tendon - minimum 6 year clinical and radiological follow-up.

Authors:  Matthias Buchner; Thorsten Schmeer; Holger Schmitt
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  14 in total

1.  Quantification of tibial bone loss in antegrade versus retrograde tunnel placement for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael Osti; Alessa Krawinkel; Thomas Hoffelner; Karl Peter Benedetto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Increased lateral tibial posterior slope is related to tibial tunnel widening after primary ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Soheil Sabzevari; Amir Ata Rahnemai-Azar; Humza S Shaikh; Justin W Arner; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Resorbable screw and sheath versus resorbable interference screw and staples for ACL reconstruction: a comparison of two tibial fixation methods.

Authors:  Christian Carulli; Fabrizio Matassi; Stefano Soderi; Luigi Sirleo; Giovanni Munz; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Correlation of tunnel widening and tunnel positioning with short-term functional outcomes in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon versus hamstring graft: a prospective study.

Authors:  Udit Kumar Biswal; Gopisankar Balaji; Sandeep Nema; Murali Poduval; Jagdish Menon; Dilip Kumar Patro
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-07-04

5.  Interference screw insertion angle has no effect on graft fixation strength for insertional Achilles tendon reconstruction.

Authors:  Ziying Wu; Hongyun Li; Shiyi Chen; Kui Ma; Shengkun Li; Peng Zhang; Yinghui Hua
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Femoral interference screw fixation of hamstring and quadriceps tendons for ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  M Ettinger; T Werner-Lebeda; T Calliess; M Omar; C Becher; M Ezechieli; M Klintschar; M Petri
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Steeper posterior tibial slope correlates with greater tibial tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Kanto Nagai; Yasutaka Tashiro; Elmar Herbst; Tom Gale; Joon Ho Wang; James J Irrgang; William Anderst; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Bone Tunnel Impaction Reduced the Tibial Tunnel Enlargement.

Authors:  Huan Xu; Rongzong Zheng; Jinhe Ying
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2017-05-11

9.  Tunnel widening prevention with the allo-Achilles tendon graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Surgical tips and short term followup.

Authors:  Dong Won Suh; Seung Beom Han; Woo Jin Yeo; Won Hee Lee; Jae Ho Kwon; Bong Soo Kyung
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Efficacy of Osteoconductive Ceramics in Bioresorbable Screws for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective Intrapatient Comparative Study.

Authors:  Johannes Barth; Panagiotis Akritopoulos; Nicolas Graveleau; Renaud Barthelemy; Cécile Toanen; Mo Saffarini
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2016-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.