| Literature DB >> 28730168 |
Huan Xu1, Rongzong Zheng1, Jinhe Ying1.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the bone tunnel impaction technique performed by dilators could dwindle the tibial tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstring tendon using both extracortical suspensory fixation devices at femoral and tibial site. Thirty-one consecutive patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction with the hamstring autograft were enrolled in this research. Patients were randomly allotted to group A (bone tunnel impaction technique using dilators) or group B (regular extraction bone tunnel drilling).Entities:
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligment reconstruction; Bone tunnel enlargement; Bone tunnel impaction
Year: 2017 PMID: 28730168 PMCID: PMC5444407 DOI: 10.1515/med-2017-0016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Med (Wars)
Demographic parameters
| Group A | Group B | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 30.5 (19 - 50) | 31.4 (18 - 49) |
| Gender | 10 male, 6 female | 8 male, 7 female |
| Side | 9 right, 7 left | 10 right, 5 left |
Figure 1Dilation process. (A): Dilating the tibial tunnel; (B): The dilator passed through the tibial tunnel;(C): The inner tunnel wall was porose and littery before dilation; (D): After a series of expansion, the texture of the tunnel wall was close-grained and consolidated.
Figure 2The Dilator. The dilator consists of a distal tapered tip mounted on the distal end of a shaft, a cylindrical shaft and a T-handle.
Figure 3The measurement of the femoral tunnel diameter. (A): Notch on the axial section (FA 1); (B): Middle on the axial section (FA 2); (C): Notch on the coronal section (FC 1); (D): Middle on the coronal section (FC 2).
Figure 4The measurement of the tibial tunnel diameter. (A): Plateau on the sagittal section (TS 1); (B): Middle on the sagittal section (TS 2); (C): Plateau on the coronal section (TC 1); (D): Middle on the coronal section (TC 2).
Figure 5The mean tunnel enlargement (± SD). There was no statistical difference for tunnel enlargement between the two groups at the femoral site (P = 0.62) but significant difference at the tibial site (P < 0.0001).