STUDY DESIGN: A secondary analysis comparing diabetic patients with nondiabetic patients enrolled in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). OBJECTIVE: To compare surgical outcomes and complications between diabetic and nondiabetic spine patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with diabetes are predisposed to comorbidities that may confound the diagnosis and treatment of patients with spinal disorders. METHODS: Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 199 patients with diabetes were compared with those of the nondiabetic population in a total of 2405 patients enrolled in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial for the diagnoses of intervertebral disc herniation (IDH), spinal stenosis (SpS), and degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). Primary outcome measures include the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Health Status questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Index. RESULTS:Patients with diabetes were significantly older and had a higher body mass index than nondiabetic patients. Comorbidities, including hypertension, stroke, cardiovascular disease, and joint disease, were significantly more frequent in diabetic patients than in nondiabetic patients. Patients with diabetes and IDH did not make significant gains in pain and function with surgical intervention relative to diabetic patients who underwent nonoperative treatment. Diabetic patients with SpS andDS experienced significantly greater improvements in pain and function with surgical intervention when compared with nonoperative treatment. Among those who had surgery, nondiabetic patients with SpS achieved marginally significantly greater gains in function than their diabetic counterparts (SF-36 physical function, P = 0.062). Among patients who had surgery for DS, diabetic patients did not have as much improvement in pain or function as did the nondiabetic population (SF-36 bodily pain, P = 0.003; physical function, P = 0.002). Postoperative complications were more prevalent in patients with diabetes than in nondiabetic patients with SpS (P = 0.002). There was an increase in postoperative (P = 0.028) and intraoperative (P = 0.029) blood replacement in DS patients with diabetes. CONCLUSION:Diabetic patients with SpS and DS benefited from surgery, though older SpS patients with diabetes have more postoperative complications. IDH patients with diabetes did not benefit from surgical intervention.
RCT Entities:
STUDY DESIGN: A secondary analysis comparing diabeticpatients with nondiabeticpatients enrolled in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). OBJECTIVE: To compare surgical outcomes and complications between diabetic and nondiabetic spinepatients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with diabetes are predisposed to comorbidities that may confound the diagnosis and treatment of patients with spinal disorders. METHODS: Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 199 patients with diabetes were compared with those of the nondiabetic population in a total of 2405 patients enrolled in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial for the diagnoses of intervertebral disc herniation (IDH), spinal stenosis (SpS), and degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). Primary outcome measures include the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Health Status questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Index. RESULTS:Patients with diabetes were significantly older and had a higher body mass index than nondiabeticpatients. Comorbidities, including hypertension, stroke, cardiovascular disease, and joint disease, were significantly more frequent in diabeticpatients than in nondiabeticpatients. Patients with diabetes and IDH did not make significant gains in pain and function with surgical intervention relative to diabeticpatients who underwent nonoperative treatment. Diabeticpatients with SpS and DS experienced significantly greater improvements in pain and function with surgical intervention when compared with nonoperative treatment. Among those who had surgery, nondiabeticpatients with SpS achieved marginally significantly greater gains in function than their diabetic counterparts (SF-36 physical function, P = 0.062). Among patients who had surgery for DS, diabeticpatients did not have as much improvement in pain or function as did the nondiabetic population (SF-36 bodily pain, P = 0.003; physical function, P = 0.002). Postoperative complications were more prevalent in patients with diabetes than in nondiabeticpatients with SpS (P = 0.002). There was an increase in postoperative (P = 0.028) and intraoperative (P = 0.029) blood replacement in DSpatients with diabetes. CONCLUSION:Diabeticpatients with SpS and DS benefited from surgery, though older SpSpatients with diabetes have more postoperative complications. IDHpatients with diabetes did not benefit from surgical intervention.
Authors: E M Gutierrez; M D Helber; D Dealva; J A Ashton-Miller; J K Richardson Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: K Kreines; E Johnson; M Albrink; G L Knatterud; M E Levin; A Lewitan; W Newberry; F A Rose Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 1985 May-Jun Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Jeremiah John Duby; R Keith Campbell; Stephen M Setter; John Raymond White; Kristin A Rasmussen Journal: Am J Health Syst Pharm Date: 2004-01-15 Impact factor: 2.637
Authors: Aaron J Fields; Britta Berg-Johansen; Lionel N Metz; Stephanie Miller; Brandan La; Ellen C Liebenberg; Dezba G Coughlin; James L Graham; Kimber L Stanhope; Peter J Havel; Jeffrey C Lotz Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2015-03-02 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Michael C Gerling; Dante Leven; Peter G Passias; Virginie Lafage; Kristina Bianco; Alexandra Lee; Jon D Lurie; Tor D Tosteson; Wenyan Zhao; Kevin F Spratt; Kristen Radcliff; Thomas J Errico Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Dante Leven; Peter G Passias; Thomas J Errico; Virginie Lafage; Kristina Bianco; Alexandra Lee; Jon D Lurie; Tor D Tosteson; Wenyan Zhao; Kevin F Spratt; Tamara S Morgan; Michael C Gerling Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Javier Z Guzman; James C Iatridis; Branko Skovrlj; Holt S Cutler; Andrew C Hecht; Sheeraz A Qureshi; Samuel K Cho Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2014-09-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Adam Pearson; Jon Lurie; Tor Tosteson; Wenyan Zhao; William Abdu; James N Weinstein Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2012-10-01 Impact factor: 3.468