William F Kerst1, Andrew J Waters1. 1. Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:Attentional retraining (AR) is a potential new treatment for addiction. AR trains addicts to attend away from drug-related cues, thereby reducing exposure to drug cues and reducing craving. We examined the utility of delivering AR to smokers on a personal digital assistant (PDA) in the natural environment. METHOD: Smokers (N = 60) not seeking to quit were randomly assigned to an AR group or a control group (i.e., a group with no training). They carried a PDA with them for one week. They were prompted to complete four assessments daily, including three attentional retrainings (AR group) or three control trainings (control group), and one evaluation of attentional bias. AR was implemented using a modified visual probe task. Attentional bias was assessed using a standard visual probe task on the PDA. RESULTS: The AR group completed an average of 15.0 attentional retrainings and the control group completed an average of 14.9 control trainings. As hypothesized, attentional bias declined over the week in the AR group, but not in the control group, Group × Day interaction, F(1, 232) = 4.77, p = .03. AR also reduced craving ratings following a briefly presented picture containing smoking and nonsmoking features, group main effect, F(1, 234) = 3.89, p = .04. AR did not significantly influence smoking behavior. CONCLUSION: AR can be administered on a mobile device in the natural environment, and AR can reduce attentional bias and craving.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Attentional retraining (AR) is a potential new treatment for addiction. AR trains addicts to attend away from drug-related cues, thereby reducing exposure to drug cues and reducing craving. We examined the utility of delivering AR to smokers on a personal digital assistant (PDA) in the natural environment. METHOD: Smokers (N = 60) not seeking to quit were randomly assigned to an AR group or a control group (i.e., a group with no training). They carried a PDA with them for one week. They were prompted to complete four assessments daily, including three attentional retrainings (AR group) or three control trainings (control group), and one evaluation of attentional bias. AR was implemented using a modified visual probe task. Attentional bias was assessed using a standard visual probe task on the PDA. RESULTS: The AR group completed an average of 15.0 attentional retrainings and the control group completed an average of 14.9 control trainings. As hypothesized, attentional bias declined over the week in the AR group, but not in the control group, Group × Day interaction, F(1, 232) = 4.77, p = .03. AR also reduced craving ratings following a briefly presented picture containing smoking and nonsmoking features, group main effect, F(1, 234) = 3.89, p = .04. AR did not significantly influence smoking behavior. CONCLUSION:AR can be administered on a mobile device in the natural environment, and AR can reduce attentional bias and craving.
Authors: Amanda R Mathew; Jessica L Burris; Brett Froeliger; Michael E Saladin; Matthew J Carpenter Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2015-01-30 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Cendrine D Robinson; Wallace B Pickworth; Stephen J Heishman; David W Wetter; Paul M Cinciripini; Yisheng Li; Brigid Rowell; Andrew J Waters Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Cendrine D Robinson; Christine Muench; Emily Brede; Romano Endrighi; Edwin H Szeto; Joanna R Sells; John P Lammers; Kolawole S Okuyemi; Andrew J Waters Journal: Psychol Addict Behav Date: 2017-06-19
Authors: Constantine J Trela; Alexander W Hayes; Bruce D Bartholow; Kenneth J Sher; Andrew C Heath; Thomas M Piasecki Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Rachna Begh; Marcus R Munafò; Saul Shiffman; Stuart G Ferguson; Linda Nichols; Mohammed A Mohammed; Roger L Holder; Stephen Sutton; Paul Aveyard Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2015-02-09 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Paul E Etcheverry; Andrew J Waters; Cho Lam; Virmarie Correa-Fernandez; Jennifer Irvin Vidrine; Paul M Cinciripini; David W Wetter Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Andrew R Mayer; Claire E Wilcox; Andrew B Dodd; Stefan D Klimaj; Charlene J Dekonenko; Eric D Claus; Michael Bogenschutz Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2016-05-16 Impact factor: 3.829