Cendrine D Robinson1, Wallace B Pickworth2, Stephen J Heishman3, David W Wetter4, Paul M Cinciripini4, Yisheng Li4, Brigid Rowell5, Andrew J Waters6. 1. Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Uniformed Services, University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD; cendrine.robinson@usuhs.edu. 2. Battelle, Centers for Public Health Research and Evaluation, Baltimore, MD; 3. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, MD; 4. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; 5. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MA. 6. Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Uniformed Services, University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD;
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Black cigarette smokers have lower rates of smoking cessation compared with Whites. However, the mechanisms underlying these differences are not clear. Many Blacks live in communities saturated by tobacco advertisements. These cue-rich environments may undermine cessation attempts by provoking smoking. Moreover, attentional bias to smoking cues (attention capture by smoking cues) has been linked to lower cessation outcomes. Cessation attempts among Blacks may be compromised by attentional bias to smoking cues and a cue-rich environment. METHOD: Attention to smoking cues in Black and White smokers was examined in 2 studies. In both studies, assessments were completed during 2 laboratory visits: a nonabstinent session and an abstinent session. In study 1, nontreatment-seeking smokers (99 Whites, 104 Blacks) completed the Subjective Attentional Bias Questionnaire (SABQ; a self-report measure of attention to cues) and the Smoking Stroop task (a reaction time measure of attentional bias to smoking cues). In study 2, 110 White and 74 Black treatment-seeking smokers completed these assessments and attempted to quit. RESULTS: In study 1, Blacks reported higher ratings than Whites on the SABQ (p = .005). In study 2, Blacks also reported higher ratings than Whites on the SABQ (p = .003). In study 2, Blacks had lower biochemical-verified point prevalence abstinence than Whites, and the between-race difference in outcome was partially mediated by SABQ ratings. CONCLUSION: Blacks reported greater attention to smoking cues than Whites, possibly due to between-race differences in environments. Greater attention to smoking cues may undermine cessation attempts.
INTRODUCTION: Black cigarette smokers have lower rates of smoking cessation compared with Whites. However, the mechanisms underlying these differences are not clear. Many Blacks live in communities saturated by tobacco advertisements. These cue-rich environments may undermine cessation attempts by provoking smoking. Moreover, attentional bias to smoking cues (attention capture by smoking cues) has been linked to lower cessation outcomes. Cessation attempts among Blacks may be compromised by attentional bias to smoking cues and a cue-rich environment. METHOD: Attention to smoking cues in Black and White smokers was examined in 2 studies. In both studies, assessments were completed during 2 laboratory visits: a nonabstinent session and an abstinent session. In study 1, nontreatment-seeking smokers (99 Whites, 104 Blacks) completed the Subjective Attentional Bias Questionnaire (SABQ; a self-report measure of attention to cues) and the Smoking Stroop task (a reaction time measure of attentional bias to smoking cues). In study 2, 110 White and 74 Black treatment-seeking smokers completed these assessments and attempted to quit. RESULTS: In study 1, Blacks reported higher ratings than Whites on the SABQ (p = .005). In study 2, Blacks also reported higher ratings than Whites on the SABQ (p = .003). In study 2, Blacks had lower biochemical-verified point prevalence abstinence than Whites, and the between-race difference in outcome was partially mediated by SABQ ratings. CONCLUSION: Blacks reported greater attention to smoking cues than Whites, possibly due to between-race differences in environments. Greater attention to smoking cues may undermine cessation attempts.
Authors: Andrew J Waters; Saul Shiffman; Michael A Sayette; Jean A Paty; Chad J Gwaltney; Mark H Balabanis Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Andrew J Waters; Edwin H Szeto; David W Wetter; Paul M Cinciripini; Jason D Robinson; Yisheng Li Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2013-07-30 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Dennis R Trinidad; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Martha M White; Sherry L Emery; Karen Messer Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-02-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Adam M Leventhal; Andrew J Waters; Eric T Moolchan; Stephen J Heishman; Wallace B Pickworth Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2010-08-10 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Cendrine D Robinson; Christine Muench; Emily Brede; Romano Endrighi; Edwin H Szeto; Joanna R Sells; John P Lammers; Kolawole S Okuyemi; Andrew J Waters Journal: Psychol Addict Behav Date: 2017-06-19
Authors: Nicole L Nollen; Matthew S Mayo; Lisa Sanderson Cox; Neal L Benowitz; Rachel F Tyndale; Edward F Ellerbeck; Taneisha S Scheuermann; Jasjit S Ahluwalia Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Tess Boley Cruz; Shyanika W Rose; Brianna A Lienemann; M Justin Byron; Helen I Meissner; Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati; Li-Ling Huang; Dana M Carroll; Claradina Soto; Jennifer B Unger Journal: Tob Induc Dis Date: 2019-09-18 Impact factor: 2.600