Literature DB >> 24814147

Chromosomal rearrangements as a major mechanism in the onset of reproductive isolation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Jing Hou1, Anne Friedrich1, Jacky de Montigny1, Joseph Schacherer2.   

Abstract

Understanding the molecular basis of how reproductive isolation evolves between individuals from the same species offers valuable insight into patterns of genetic differentiation as well as the onset of speciation [1, 2]. The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae constitutes an ideal model partly due to its vast ecological range, high level of genetic diversity [3-6], and laboratory-amendable sexual reproduction. Between S. cerevisiae and its sibling species in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex, reproductive isolation acts postzygotically and could be attributed to chromosomal rearrangements [7], cytonuclear incompatibility [8, 9], and antirecombination [10, 11], although the implication of these mechanisms at the incipient stage of speciation remains unclear due to further divergence in the nascent species. Recently, several studies assessed the onset of intraspecific reproductive isolation in S. cerevisiae by evaluating the effect of the mismatch repair system [12-14] or by fostering incipient speciation using the same initial genetic background [15-18]. Nevertheless, the overall genetic diversity within this species was largely overlooked, and no systematic evaluation has been performed. Here, we carried out the first species-wide survey for postzygotic reproductive isolation in S. cerevisiae. We crossed 60 natural isolates sampled from diverse niches with the reference strain S288c and identified 16 cases of reproductive isolation with reduced offspring viabilities ranging from 44% to 86%. Using different mapping strategies, we identified reciprocal translocations in a large fraction of all isolates surveyed, indicating that large-scale chromosomal rearrangements might play a major role in the onset of reproductive isolation in this species.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24814147      PMCID: PMC4067053          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  43 in total

1.  Reciprocal gene loss following experimental whole-genome duplication causes reproductive isolation in yeast.

Authors:  Calum J Maclean; Duncan Greig
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Engineering evolution to study speciation in yeasts.

Authors:  Daniela Delneri; Isabelle Colson; Sofia Grammenoudi; Ian N Roberts; Edward J Louis; Stephen G Oliver
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Analysis of the chromosomal DNA polymorphism of wine strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  C Bidenne; B Blondin; S Dequin; F Vezinhet
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.886

4.  Incompatibility of nuclear and mitochondrial genomes causes hybrid sterility between two yeast species.

Authors:  Hsin-Yi Lee; Jui-Yu Chou; Liplee Cheong; Nai-Hsin Chang; Shi-Yow Yang; Jun-Yi Leu
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Evidence for autotetraploidy associated with reproductive isolation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: towards a new domesticated species.

Authors:  W Albertin; P Marullo; M Aigle; A Bourgais; M Bely; C Dillmann; D DE Vienne; D Sicard
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  A role for the mismatch repair system during incipient speciation in Saccharomyces.

Authors:  D Greig; M Travisano; E J Louis; R H Borts
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Meiotic pairing and segregation of translocation quadrivalents in yeast.

Authors:  J Loidl; Q W Jin; M Jantsch
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  A novel sperm-delivered toxin causes late-stage embryo lethality and transmission ratio distortion in C. elegans.

Authors:  Hannah S Seidel; Michael Ailion; Jialing Li; Alexander van Oudenaarden; Matthew V Rockman; Leonid Kruglyak
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  A screen for recessive speciation genes expressed in the gametes of F1 hybrid yeast.

Authors:  Duncan Greig
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Determinants of divergent adaptation and Dobzhansky-Muller interaction in experimental yeast populations.

Authors:  James B Anderson; Jason Funt; Dawn Anne Thompson; Snehit Prabhu; Amanda Socha; Caroline Sirjusingh; Jeremy R Dettman; Lucas Parreiras; David S Guttman; Aviv Regev; Linda M Kohn
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  48 in total

1.  Karyotype engineering by chromosome fusion leads to reproductive isolation in yeast.

Authors:  Jingchuan Luo; Xiaoji Sun; Brendan P Cormack; Jef D Boeke
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  The Evolution of Sexual Reproduction and the Mating-Type Locus: Links to Pathogenesis of Cryptococcus Human Pathogenic Fungi.

Authors:  Sheng Sun; Marco A Coelho; Márcia David-Palma; Shelby J Priest; Joseph Heitman
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 16.830

3.  Fungal evolution: On the origin of yeast species.

Authors:  Rike B Stelkens; Duncan Greig
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 17.745

4.  Fitness Trade-Offs Lead to Suppressor Tolerance in Yeast.

Authors:  Jing Hou; Joseph Schacherer
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 5.  Genome Diversity and Evolution in the Budding Yeasts (Saccharomycotina).

Authors:  Bernard A Dujon; Edward J Louis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Negative epistasis: a route to intraspecific reproductive isolation in yeast?

Authors:  Jing Hou; Joseph Schacherer
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 3.886

7.  Species-wide genetic incompatibility analysis identifies immune genes as hot spots of deleterious epistasis.

Authors:  Eunyoung Chae; Kirsten Bomblies; Sang-Tae Kim; Darya Karelina; Maricris Zaidem; Stephan Ossowski; Carmen Martín-Pizarro; Roosa A E Laitinen; Beth A Rowan; Hezi Tenenboim; Sarah Lechner; Monika Demar; Anette Habring-Müller; Christa Lanz; Gunnar Rätsch; Detlef Weigel
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Centromere scission drives chromosome shuffling and reproductive isolation.

Authors:  Vikas Yadav; Sheng Sun; Marco A Coelho; Joseph Heitman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Transient structural variations have strong effects on quantitative traits and reproductive isolation in fission yeast.

Authors:  Daniel C Jeffares; Clemency Jolly; Mimoza Hoti; Doug Speed; Liam Shaw; Charalampos Rallis; Francois Balloux; Christophe Dessimoz; Jürg Bähler; Fritz J Sedlazeck
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  A yeast living ancestor reveals the origin of genomic introgressions.

Authors:  Melania D'Angiolo; Matteo De Chiara; Jia-Xing Yue; Agurtzane Irizar; Simon Stenberg; Karl Persson; Agnès Llored; Benjamin Barré; Joseph Schacherer; Roberto Marangoni; Eric Gilson; Jonas Warringer; Gianni Liti
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.