| Literature DB >> 24810273 |
Thomas Källman1, Stéphane De Mita2, Hanna Larsson1, Niclas Gyllenstrand3, Myriam Heuertz4, Laura Parducci1, Yoshihisa Suyama5, Ulf Lagercrantz1, Martin Lascoux1.
Abstract
The ability of plants to track seasonal changes is largely dependent on genes assigned to the photoperiod pathway, and variation in those genes is thereby important for adaptation to local day length conditions. Extensive physiological data in several temperate conifer species suggest that populations are adapted to local light conditions, but data on the genes underlying this adaptation are more limited. Here we present nucleotide diversity data from 19 genes putatively involved in photoperiodic response in Norway spruce (Picea abies). Based on similarity to model plants the genes were grouped into three categories according to their presumed position in the photoperiod pathway: photoreceptors, circadian clock genes, and downstream targets. An HKA (Hudson, Kreitman and Aquade) test showed a significant excess of diversity at photoreceptor genes, but no departure from neutrality at circadian genes and downstream targets. Departures from neutrality were also tested with Tajima's D and Fay and Wu's H statistics under three demographic scenarios: the standard neutral model, a population expansion model, and a more complex population split model. Only one gene, the circadian clock gene PaPRR3 with a highly positive Tajima's D value, deviates significantly from all tested demographic scenarios. As the PaPRR3 gene harbours multiple non-synonymous variants it appears as an excellent candidate gene for control of photoperiod response in Norway spruce.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24810273 PMCID: PMC4014479 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095306
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Annotation of putative photoperiod pathway genes from spruce when compared to the proteins of the model plant Arabidopsis and accession number for the best hit in the current version of the P. abies genome sequence.
| Gene | AA | FL | Hit A. thaliana | Hit P. abies | Category |
| PaCRY | 259 | No | AT4G08920 ATCRY1, cryptochrome 1 | MA_10428291 | Photoreceptor |
| PaPHYN-r1 | 253 | No | AT2G18790 PHYB, HY3 | MA_73153 | Photoreceptor |
| PaPHYN-rII | 229 | No | AT1G09570 PHYA, FHY2 | MA_73153 | Photoreceptor |
| PaPHYO | 437 | No | AT1G09570 PHYA, FHY2 | MA_6809 | Photoreceptor |
| PaPHYP-rI | 264 | No | AT2G18790 PHYB, HY3 | MA_10435530 | Photoreceptor |
| PaPHYP-rII | 91 | No | AT2G18790 PHYB, HY3 | MA_10435530 | Photoreceptor |
| PaPAT1 | 70 | No | AT5G48150 PAT1 | MA_10432093 | Photoreceptor |
| PaZTL | 376 | No | AT5G57360 Adagio protein 1, ZTL | MA_70291 | Photoreceptor |
| PaGI | 115 | No | AT1G22770 GI, gigantea protein | MA_19575 | Circadian Clock |
| PaPRR1 | 558 | Yes | AT5G61380 APRR1 | MA_71728 | Circadian Clock |
| PaPRR3 | 168 | No | AT2G46670 CCT motif family protein | MA_10316458 | Circadian Clock |
| PaPRR7 | 290 | No | AT5G02810 APRR7 | MA_124244 | Circadian Clock |
| PaEBS | 139 | No | AT4G22140 EBS, early bolting short days | MA_10430427 | Downstream target |
| PaCOL1 | 410 | Yes | AT5G24930 ATCOL4, constans-like 4 | MA_54929 | Downstream target |
| PaCOL2 | 361 | Yes | AT5G24930 ATCOL4, constans-like 4 | MA_7292 | Downstream target |
| PaMFT1 | 87 | No | AT1G18100 MFT, E12A11 | MA_4742 | Downstream target |
| PaMFT2 | 157 | No | AT1G18100 MFT, E12A11 | MA_66653 | Downstream target |
| PaFTL1 | 172 | Yes | AT1G65480 Flowering locus T | MA_400747 | Downstream target |
| PaFTL2 | 66 | No | AT5G03840 Terminal flower 1 | MA_5386467 | Downstream target |
Number of amino acids available from Picea abies used in the protein search
Is the sequence a putative full length protein sequence
The hit reported is the protein with the lowest e-value when the spruce protein sequence is used as query with the program blastp against the complete protein space of Arabidopsis thaliana
The hit reported is the best hit obtained with blastn against the gene containing scaffold of the spruce genome assembly v. 1.0 (http://congenie.org).
Diversity statistics for the 14 background loci (at the top of the table) and the 19 photoperiodic pathway loci used in the study.
| Locus | N | Sites | H |
|
|
|
|
| Pa1100 | 40 | 346 | 0.83 | 0.0041 | 0.0039 | 0.0054 | 0 |
| Pa1151 | 49 | 480 | 0.69 | 0.0037 | 0.0021 | NA | NA |
| Pa121 | 41 | 440 | 0.23 | 0.0021 | 0.0005 | NA | NA |
| Pa129 | 49 | 275 | 0.47 | 0.0016 | 0.0018 | NA | NA |
| Pa1358 | 49 | 447 | 0.68 | 0.0040 | 0.0029 | 0.0097 | 0.0025 |
| Pa1364 | 47 | 552 | 0.42 | 0.0016 | 0.0013 | 0.0028 | 0 |
| Pa1368 | 47 | 429 | 0.20 | 0.0026 | 0.0010 | 0.0027 | 0.0026 |
| Pa1390 | 49 | 495 | 0.92 | 0.0059 | 0.0048 | 0.0111 | 0.0029 |
| Pa1391 | 47 | 503 | 0.30 | 0.0018 | 0.0010 | NA | NA |
| Pa1420 | 49 | 571 | 0.95 | 0.0082 | 0.0068 | 0.0212 | 0.0028 |
| Pa225 | 48 | 209 | 0.58 | 0.0065 | 0.0034 | 0.0087 | 0 |
| PaSb16 | 46 | 757 | 0.77 | 0.0078 | 0.0044 | 0.0113 | 0.0000 |
| PaSb29 | 46 | 532 | 0.85 | 0.0056 | 0.0060 | 0.0050 | 0.0035 |
| PaSb62 | 35 | 537 | 0.76 | 0.0063 | 0.0030 | 0.0099 | 0.0011 |
| PaPhyN-rI | 54 | 759 | 0.62 | 0.0023 | 0.0012 | 0.0051 | 0.0015 |
| PaPhyN-rII | 35 | 689 | 0.16 | 0.0007 | 0.0002 | 0.0016 | 0.0005 |
| PaPhyO | 44 | 1776 | 0.91 | 0.0025 | 0.0016 | 0.0042 | 0.0011 |
| PaPhyP-rI | 49 | 794 | 0.51 | 0.0011 | 0.0011 | 0.0035 | 0.0004 |
| PaPhyP-rII | 53 | 273 | 0.44 | 0.0040 | 0.0020 | 0.0106 | 0.0021 |
| PaCry | 52 | 918 | 0.42 | 0.0010 | 0.0006 | 0 | 0.0015 |
| PaPAT1 | 40 | 420 | 0.40 | 0.0017 | 0.0020 | 0.0018 | 0.0015 |
| PaZTL | 41 | 1220 | 0.96 | 0.0063 | 0.0042 | 0.0175 | 0.0009 |
| PaGI | 48 | 772 | 0.55 | 0.0020 | 0.0013 | 0.0022 | 0.0019 |
| PaPRR1 | 32 | 3939 | 0.97 | 0.0059 | 0.0058 | 0.0068 | 0.0041 |
| PaPRR3 | 42 | 891 | 0.78 | 0.0026 | 0.0039 | 0.0037 | 0.0018 |
| PaPRR7 | 43 | 1503 | 0.72 | 0.0029 | 0.0016 | 0.0039 | 0.0017 |
| PaCol1 | 46 | 3196 | 0.98 | 0.0054 | 0.0030 | 0.0074 | 0.0003 |
| PaCol2 | 71 | 1191 | 0.93 | 0.0066 | 0.0038 | 0.0116 | 0.0042 |
| PaEBS | 50 | 730 | 0.48 | 0.0049 | 0.0023 | 0.0014 | 0.0077 |
| PaFTL1 | 67 | 2464 | 0.97 | 0.0060 | 0.0036 | 0.0068 | 0.0017 |
| PaFTL2 | 63 | 644 | 0.64 | 0.0056 | 0.0049 | 0.0068 | 0.0014 |
| PaMFT1 | 70 | 3997 | 1.00 | 0.0090 | 0.0068 | 0.0087 | 0.0000 |
| PaMFT2 | 90 | 975 | 0.95 | 0.0063 | 0.0038 | 0.0096 | 0.0000 |
Total number of Picea abies sequences
Number of sites after excluding gaps and sites with missing data
Haplotype diversity
: Estimate of the population mutation rate , based on the number of segregating sites (per base pair)
: Estimate of the population mutation rate, , based on nucleotide diversity, . (per base pair)
NA = Not applicable
Likelihood values from the mlHKA test of the different group of photoperiodic genes.
| Model | Photoreceptors (8) | Circadian clock genes (4) | Downstream targets (4) |
| Neutral | 130.443 | 104.235 | 107.351 |
| Selected | 120.733 | 104.361 | 105.647 |
| Test statistics | 19.42 | −0.252 | 3.408 |
| P-value |
|
|
|
The value within parentheses is the degrees of freedom in the likelihood ratio test.
Test statistics for deviation from neutral expectations for the photoperiod pathway related genes.
| Locus | Tajima's D | Fay & Wu's H | Fay & Wu's H | K value from mlHKA |
| PaPhyN-rI | −1.27 | −1.89 | 0.55 | 1.49 |
| PaPhyN-rII | −1.28 | 0.16 | NA | 0.44 |
| PaPhyO | −1.16 | −9.35 | 0.21 | 0.92 |
| PaPhyP-rI | 0.04 | 0.40 | −0.30 | 0.82 |
| PaPhyP-rII | −1.18 | 0.36 | −1.42 | 2.42 |
| PaCry | −0.93 | −2.92 | −4.88 | 0.36 |
| PaPAT1 | 0.35 | −0.72 | 0.56 | 0.65 |
| PaZTL | −1.19 | −2.72 | 3.60 | 4.60 |
| PaGI | −1.00 | 0.66 | 0.78 | 0.90 |
| PaPRR1 | −0.09 | 0.71 | NA | 1.37 |
| PaPRR3 | 1.44 | −0.58 | −0.85 | 0.75 |
| PaPRR7 | −1.49 | −1.02 | −0.29 | 1.29 |
| PaCol1 | −1.57 | −13.26 | −3.38 | 1.53 |
| PaCol2 | −1.37 | 0.31 | −2.97 | 1.73 |
| PaEBS | −1.67 | −9.03 | −2.61 | 1.35 |
| PaFTL1 | −1.36 | NA | NA | NA |
| PaFTL2 | −0.40 | −5.73 | NA | 0.63 |
| PaMFT1 | −0.87 | NA | NA | NA |
| PaMFT2 | −1.21 | NA | NA | NA |
With Pinus taeda as outgroup
With Picea species as outgroup
Observed value in the 5% lower or 95% upper quantile for SNM.
Observed value in the 5% lower or 95% upper quantile for PEM.
Observed value in the 5% lower or 95% upper quantile for SPM.
Figure 1Map of Europe with sample locations shown as dots.