Literature DB >> 24809961

Genomic landscape of human, bat, and ex vivo DNA transposon integrations.

Rebeca Campos-Sánchez1, Aurélie Kapusta2, Cédric Feschotte2, Francesca Chiaromonte3, Kateryna D Makova4.   

Abstract

The integration and fixation preferences of DNA transposons, one of the major classes of eukaryotic transposable elements, have never been evaluated comprehensively on a genome-wide scale. Here, we present a detailed study of the distribution of DNA transposons in the human and bat genomes. We studied three groups of DNA transposons that integrated at different evolutionary times: 1) ancient (>40 My) and currently inactive human elements, 2) younger (<40 My) bat elements, and 3) ex vivo integrations of piggyBat and Sleeping Beauty elements in HeLa cells. Although the distribution of ex vivo elements reflected integration preferences, the distribution of human and (to a lesser extent) bat elements was also affected by selection. We used regression techniques (linear, negative binomial, and logistic regression models with multiple predictors) applied to 20-kb and 1-Mb windows to investigate how the genomic landscape in the vicinity of DNA transposons contributes to their integration and fixation. Our models indicate that genomic landscape explains 16-79% of variability in DNA transposon genome-wide distribution. Importantly, we not only confirmed previously identified predictors (e.g., DNA conformation and recombination hotspots) but also identified several novel predictors (e.g., signatures of double-strand breaks and telomere hexamer). Ex vivo integrations showed a bias toward actively transcribed regions. Older DNA transposons were located in genomic regions scarce in most conserved elements-likely reflecting purifying selection. Our study highlights how DNA transposons are integral to the evolution of bat and human genomes, and has implications for the development of DNA transposon assays for gene therapy and mutagenesis applications.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA transposons; Myotis lucifugus genome; human genome; integration preferences; logistic regression; multiple linear regression; negative binomial regression

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24809961      PMCID: PMC4069622          DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msu138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  105 in total

Review 1.  Use of the piggyBac transposon for germ-line transformation of insects.

Authors:  Alfred M Handler
Journal:  Insect Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.714

Review 2.  The struggle for life of the genome's selfish architects.

Authors:  Aurélie Hua-Van; Arnaud Le Rouzic; Thibaud S Boutin; Jonathan Filée; Pierre Capy
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 4.540

3.  Human L1 element target-primed reverse transcription in vitro.

Authors:  Gregory J Cost; Qinghua Feng; Alain Jacquier; Jef D Boeke
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Maize Activator transposase has a bipartite DNA binding domain that recognizes subterminal sequences and the terminal inverted repeats.

Authors:  H A Becker; R Kunze
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1997-04-16

5.  Chromosomal transposition of a Tc1/mariner-like element in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  G Luo; Z Ivics; Z Izsvák; A Bradley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Functional characterization of piggyBat from the bat Myotis lucifugus unveils an active mammalian DNA transposon.

Authors:  Rupak Mitra; Xianghong Li; Aurélie Kapusta; David Mayhew; Robi D Mitra; Cédric Feschotte; Nancy L Craig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Structure-based prediction of insertion-site preferences of transposons into chromosomes.

Authors:  Aron M Geurts; Christopher S Hackett; Jason B Bell; Tracy L Bergemann; Lara S Collier; Corey M Carlson; David A Largaespada; Perry B Hackett
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition.

Authors:  Remo Rohs; Sean M West; Alona Sosinsky; Peng Liu; Richard S Mann; Barry Honig
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Centromere sequence and dynamics in Dictyostelium discoideum.

Authors:  Gernot Glöckner; Andrew J Heidel
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 10.  The Sleeping Beauty transposable element: evolution, regulation and genetic applications.

Authors:  Zoltán Ivics; Christopher D Kaufman; Hatem Zayed; Csaba Miskey; Oliver Walisko; Zsuzsanna Izsvák
Journal:  Curr Issues Mol Biol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.081

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Integration site selection by retroviruses and transposable elements in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Tania Sultana; Alessia Zamborlini; Gael Cristofari; Pascale Lesage
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 2.  Coevolution between transposable elements and recombination.

Authors:  Tyler V Kent; Jasmina Uzunović; Stephen I Wright
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  The effects of chromatin organization on variation in mutation rates in the genome.

Authors:  Kateryna D Makova; Ross C Hardison
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  TE-domestication and horizontal transfer in a putative Nef-AP1mu mimic of HLA-A cytoplasmic domain re-trafficking.

Authors:  Joseph S Murray; Elaina H Murray
Journal:  Mob Genet Elements       Date:  2016-04-12

5.  Non-B DNA: a major contributor to small- and large-scale variation in nucleotide substitution frequencies across the genome.

Authors:  Wilfried M Guiblet; Marzia A Cremona; Robert S Harris; Di Chen; Kristin A Eckert; Francesca Chiaromonte; Yi-Fei Huang; Kateryna D Makova
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Integration and Fixation Preferences of Human and Mouse Endogenous Retroviruses Uncovered with Functional Data Analysis.

Authors:  Rebeca Campos-Sánchez; Marzia A Cremona; Alessia Pini; Francesca Chiaromonte; Kateryna D Makova
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Profiling of Human Molecular Pathways Affected by Retrotransposons at the Level of Regulation by Transcription Factor Proteins.

Authors:  Daniil Nikitin; Dmitry Penzar; Andrew Garazha; Maxim Sorokin; Victor Tkachev; Nicolas Borisov; Alexander Poltorak; Vladimir Prassolov; Anton A Buzdin
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  Hsp90 and Physiological Stress Are Linked to Autonomous Transposon Mobility and Heritable Genetic Change in Nematodes.

Authors:  Calen P Ryan; Jeremy C Brownlie; Steve Whyard
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  Chromatin states shape insertion profiles of the piggyBac, Tol2 and Sleeping Beauty transposons and murine leukemia virus.

Authors:  Junko Yoshida; Keiko Akagi; Ryo Misawa; Chikara Kokubu; Junji Takeda; Kyoji Horie
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Human Endogenous Retroviruses in Neurological Diseases.

Authors:  Patrick Küry; Avindra Nath; Alain Créange; Antonina Dolei; Patrice Marche; Julian Gold; Gavin Giovannoni; Hans-Peter Hartung; Hervé Perron
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 11.951

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.