Literature DB >> 24806623

Randomized clinical trial: nasoenteric tube or jejunostomy as a route for nutrition after major upper gastrointestinal operations.

Luiz Gonzaga Torres Júnior1, Fernando Augusto de Vasconcellos Santos, Maria Isabel Toulson Davisson Correia.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Curative treatment of upper gastrointestinal tract neoplasms is complex and associated with high morbidity and mortality. In general, the patients are already malnourished, and early postoperative enteral nutrition is recommended. However, there is no consensus concerning the best enteral access route in these cases.
METHODS: A prospective randomized trial was performed from 2008 to 2012 with 59 patients who underwent esophagectomy, total gastrectomy, or pancreaticoduodenectomy. In all, 4 patients declined to participate, and 13 did not meet the inclusion criteria and were excluded. Of the 42 included patients, 21 had nasoenteric tubes, and 21 had a jejunostomy.
RESULTS: The two groups were similar in demographic and clinical aspects. The nasoenteric (NE) and jejunostomy groups underwent early enteral therapy in 71 and 62 % of cases (p > 0.05), respectively. The median length of enteral therapy use was less in the NE group (5.0 vs. 8.5 days), but the difference was not statistically significant. The NE group required introduction of parenteral therapy more frequently than the jejunostomy group (p < 0.05). Complications related to the enteral route occurred in 38.0 and 28.5 % of patients (p > 0.05) in the NE and jejunostomy groups, respectively. In the NE group, there were four losses and four tube obstructions. In the jejunostomy group, there were two losses, four obstructions, and two cases of leakage around the tube. In the latter group, patients who underwent therapy for a longer time had tubal complications (p < 0.05) and longer intensive care unit and hospital stays (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The two enteral routes were associated with the same number of complications. However, the presence of a jejunostomy allowed enteral therapy for longer periods, especially in patients with complications, thus avoiding the need for parenteral nutrition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24806623     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-014-2589-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  26 in total

Review 1.  The impact of early nutrition on metabolic response and postoperative ileus.

Authors:  Maria Isabel Toulson Davisson Correia; Rodrigo Gomes da Silva
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.294

Review 2.  Is early feeding after major gastrointestinal surgery a fashion or an advance? Evidence-based review of literature.

Authors:  Shailesh V Shrikhande; Guruprasad S Shetty; Kailash Singh; Sachin Ingle
Journal:  J Cancer Res Ther       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.805

3.  Randomized clinical trial comparing feeding jejunostomy with nasoduodenal tube placement in patients undergoing oesophagectomy.

Authors:  I J M Han-Geurts; W C Hop; C Verhoef; K T C Tran; H W Tilanus
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Early enteral feeding compared with parenteral nutrition after oesophageal or oesophagogastric resection and reconstruction.

Authors:  S Gabor; H Renner; V Matzi; B Ratzenhofer; J Lindenmann; O Sankin; H Pinter; A Maier; J Smolle; F M Smolle-Jüttner
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.718

Review 5.  Enteral versus parenteral nutrition after gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in the English literature.

Authors:  Takero Mazaki; Kiyoko Ebisawa
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Prophylactic tube jejunostomy: a worthwhile undertaking.

Authors:  Anand Ramamurthy; Sanjay Singh Negi; Adarsh Chaudhary
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 7.  Reducing hospital morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy.

Authors:  B Zane Atkins; Ashish S Shah; Kelley A Hutcheson; Jennifer H Mangum; Theodore N Pappas; David H Harpole; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Nasal bridling decreases feeding tube dislodgment and may increase caloric intake in the surgical intensive care unit: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Christopher W Seder; William Stockdale; Linda Hale; Randy J Janczyk
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  A comparative analysis of safety and efficacy of different methods of tube placement for enteral feeding following major pancreatic resection. A non-randomized study.

Authors:  Mohammad Abu-Hilal; Anil K Hemandas; Mark McPhail; Gaurav Jain; Ioanna Panagiotopoulou; Tina Scibelli; Colin D Johnson; Neil W Pearce
Journal:  JOP       Date:  2010-01-08

10.  Postoperative nutritional effects of early enteral feeding compared with total parental nutrition in pancreaticoduodectomy patients: a prosepective, randomized study.

Authors:  Joon Seong Park; Hye-Kyung Chung; Ho Kyoung Hwang; Jae Keun Kim; Dong Sup Yoon
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 2.153

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Feeding Challenges in Patients with Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Cancers.

Authors:  Daniel Reim; Helmut Friess
Journal:  Gastrointest Tumors       Date:  2016-01-08

2.  Clinical Burden of Laparoscopic Feeding Jejunostomy Tubes.

Authors:  Emily A Speer; Simon C Chow; Christy M Dunst; Amber L Shada; Valerie Halpin; Kevin M Reavis; Maria Cassera; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Outcomes of laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy tube placement in 299 patients.

Authors:  Monica T Young; Hung Troung; Alana Gebhart; Anderson Shih; Ninh T Nguyen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Routes of early enteral nutrition following oesophagectomy.

Authors:  M Elshaer; G Gravante; J White; J Livingstone; A Riaz; A Al-Bahrani
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Feeding Jejunostomy Tube Placed during Esophagectomy: Is There an Effect on Postoperative Outcomes?

Authors:  Mohammed H Al-Temimi; Anya M Dyurgerova; Michael Kidon; Samir Johna
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2019-08-26

Review 6.  Jejunostomy at the time of esophagectomy is associated with improved short-term perioperative outcomes: analysis of the NSQIP database.

Authors:  Michael Watson; Sally Trufan; Jennifer H Benbow; Nicole L Gower; Joshua Hill; Jonathan C Salo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2020-04

7.  Evaluation of the need for routine feeding jejunostomy for enteral nutrition after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Yuji Akiyama; Takeshi Iwaya; Fumitaka Endo; Haruka Nikai; Kei Sato; Shigeaki Baba; Takehiro Chiba; Toshimoto Kimura; Takeshi Takahara; Hiroyuki Nitta; Koki Otsuka; Masaru Mizuno; Yusuke Kimura; Keisuke Koeda; Akira Sasaki
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Critical analysis of feeding jejunostomy following resection of upper gastrointestinal malignancies.

Authors:  Andrew M Blakely; Saad Ajmal; Rachel E Sargent; Thomas T Ng; Thomas J Miner
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-02-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.