DNA-stabilized silver clusters are remarkable for the selection of fluorescence color by the sequence of the stabilizing DNA oligomer. Yet despite a growing number of applications that exploit this property, no large-scale studies have probed origins of cluster color or whether certain colors occur more frequently than others. Here we employ a set of 684 randomly chosen 10-base oligomers to address these questions. Rather than a flat distribution, we find that specific color bands dominate. Cluster size data indicate that these "magic colors" originate from the existence of magic numbers for DNA-stabilized silver clusters, which differ from those of spheroidal gold clusters stabilized by small-molecule ligands. Elongated cluster structures, enforced by multiple base ligands along the DNA, can account for both magic number sizes and color variation around peak wavelength populations.
DNA-stabilized silver clusters are remarkable for the selection of fluorescence color by the sequence of the stabilizing DNA oligomer. Yet despite a growing number of applications that exploit this property, no large-scale studies have probed origins of cluster color or whether certain colors occur more frequently than others. Here we employ a set of 684 randomly chosen 10-base oligomers to address these questions. Rather than a flat distribution, we find that specific color bands dominate. Cluster size data indicate that these "magic colors" originate from the existence of magic numbers for DNA-stabilized silver clusters, which differ from those of spheroidal gold clusters stabilized by small-molecule ligands. Elongated cluster structures, enforced by multiple base ligands along the DNA, can account for both magic number sizes and color variation around peak wavelength populations.
Ligand-stabilized
metal nanoclusters
are an exciting class of materials due to their remarkable chemical,
electrical, and optical properties[1,2] and promise
for applications in catalysis,[2,3] nanoelectronics,[1] and biosensing.[2] Ligands
enable cluster sizes that are not otherwise stable in solution.[3] The physical, chemical, and optical properties
of a ligand-stabilized metal cluster are intimately connected to the
properties of the ligand itself. Ligand–metal bonds at the
cluster surface can even dictate the so-called “magic numbers”
of gold clusters that occur due to enhanced stability of certain clusters
with select numbers of metal atoms, reflecting electronic shell closings.[4,5]Most ligand-stabilized noble metal nanoclusters have quasi-spherical
geometries. However, a new class of DNA-stabilized silver clusters[6] (Ag-DNA) displays
evidence for rod-like shapes,[7] an exciting
feature due to the possibility of new functionalities based on shape-tuned
color and anisotropic polarization response. The challenge of isolating
these small fluorescent clusters, which are surrounded by bulky DNA
ligands, was recently overcome,[8,9] enabling identification
of total silver content as N = 10–24 Ag atoms,
with 1–2 DNA oligomers associated with each cluster.[9] Reported optical properties of Ag-DNA vary widely, depending on DNA strand specifics.[9] Some are brightly fluorescent, with narrow-band
emission wavelengths spanning the visible and near-IR[10] and quantum yields exceeding 90%.[7] High photostabilities have also been reported.[11] Due to these unique fluorescence properties, Ag-DNA are now employed in a number of fascinating
sensing applications, including detection of metal ions,[12,13] microRNAs,[14,15] target DNA strands in the presence
of serum,[16] and single base mutations relevant
to human diseases.[17,18]Despite this growing list
of applications, little is known about
the origins of cluster color in Ag-DNA.
Strategies for selecting cluster-stabilizing DNA oligomers generally
focus on experimentally testing small sets of cytosine (C)-rich or
guanine (G)-rich oligomers, which are important for forming fluorescent
products,[19−21] to find sequences that produce attributes appropriate
to a specific application. Here we instead use a large set of 684
distinct 10-base oligomers with widely varying composition to probe
the origins of clusters with varying colors. We randomly selected
sequences containing at least three total C plus G bases from a larger
set produced using a random number generator with equal probability
of placing A, C, G, or T bases at each site. Sequences containing
less than a total of three C plus G bases were excluded to increase
the probability of obtaining fluorescent Ag-DNA solutions, which only slightly changes the base content
of the random sequence set (see Supporting Information Figure S1).Robotic parallel synthesis of Ag-DNA
under identical conditions was performed in well plate format (Figure 1b). In each well, the hydrated DNA oligomer was
mixed with AgNO3, followed by NaBH4 reduction.
All clusters were excited via the DNA bases using 280 nm excitation.[10] The fluorescence spectra of resulting products
were fitted to single Gaussian lineshapes to extract peak fluorescence
wavelengths (see Supporting Information). Here we examine results from oligomers that stabilize clusters
having (1) fluorescence brightness well above the noise level and
(2) single, rather than multiple, fluorescence peaks, corresponding
to one dominant fluorescent product (typically one Ag-DNA species formed by a single oligomer under certain
synthesis conditions is most desirable for applications[22,23]). Such oligomers comprised up to 25% of the total strand set, depending
on synthesis conditions. Apparently sequences producing one dominant
fluorescent product are fairly common among randomly selected strands.
The remaining 75% of the strands either did not stabilize silver clusters,
stabilized “dark” clusters that were not measurably
fluorescent, or stabilized clusters that produced very low fluorescent
signals due to low chemical yields or quantum yields of fluorescent
products. These strands are presumably not favorable hosts for silver
clusters, perhaps due to insufficient association to Ag+ or because silver clusters stabilized by these strands are not in
environments that favor radiative decay.
Figure 1
(a) Peak fluorescence wavelength histograms
for Ag-DNA stabilized by randomly generated
10-base oligomers,
synthesized at 10 μM DNA and 20 μM DNA with Ag+:DNA = 5:1 and measured 1 week after synthesis to ensure stability
of measured products. The number of data, N, indicated
on each graph, represents the number of brightly fluorescent Ag-DNA with single-Gaussian spectra that are
histogrammed in each plot (see main text). Maximum likelihood estimation
fits to a sum of two normal distributions are in red. b) Cartoon schematic of parallel robotic synthesis and fluorescence
characterization. c) A histogram of published Ag-DNA fluorescence wavelengths[6−9,12,13,17,18,21,25−29] is strikingly similar to those resulting from the randomly chosen
10-base strands (Figure 1a).
Histograms of fluorescence
wavelengths from single-peak solutions
demonstrate bimodal color distributions with enhanced abundances of
“green” Ag-DNA near 540
nm and “red” Ag-DNA near
630 nm (Figure 1a and S2). Although relative heights change somewhat, histogram peaks are
invariant over time (one day, one week, and four weeks after synthesis)
and synthesis conditions (data for additional synthesis conditions
and time points are in Supporting Information), suggesting enhanced stabilities of Ag-DNA that possess colors near 540 and 630 nm.[24] The 850 nm sensitivity limit of the well plate reader precludes
detection at longer wavelengths.(a) Peak fluorescence wavelength histograms
for Ag-DNA stabilized by randomly generated
10-base oligomers,
synthesized at 10 μM DNA and 20 μM DNA with Ag+:DNA = 5:1 and measured 1 week after synthesis to ensure stability
of measured products. The number of data, N, indicated
on each graph, represents the number of brightly fluorescent Ag-DNA with single-Gaussian spectra that are
histogrammed in each plot (see main text). Maximum likelihood estimation
fits to a sum of two normal distributions are in red. b) Cartoon schematic of parallel robotic synthesis and fluorescence
characterization. c) A histogram of published Ag-DNA fluorescence wavelengths[6−9,12,13,17,18,21,25−29] is strikingly similar to those resulting from the randomly chosen
10-base strands (Figure 1a).To investigate whether these color bands are specific to
10-base
oligomers, we surveyed results on 79 strands previously reported to
form fluorescent Ag-DNA,[6−9,12,13,17,18,21,25−29] with widely varying sequence lengths (6–34 bases) and synthesis
conditions. Care was taken to avoid duplicating reported results on
identical strands (many oligomers are utilized across multiple studies).
A histogram of reported peak fluorescence wavelengths shows a similar
color distribution (Figure 1c), with abundances
of green and red species as compared to other colors (an additional
peak in the near-IR may also indicate a third abundance that is not
detectable with our plate reader, which has poor sensitivity beyond
∼750 nm.) Apparently “magic colors” are generic,
rather than special to strands of specific length.We next consider
whether Ag-DNA within
a “magic color” grouping also share similar cluster
properties, regardless of sequence specifics. Previous work used high-performance
liquid chromatography with in-line mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) to
identify total numbers of silver atoms, N, and silver
cations, N, for 51 different
Ag-DNA products[7] that formed on 10 different mixed base sequences with 16–34
bases. From this data we extract the number of neutral silver atoms, N0, in each cluster: N0= N – N (Figure 2a,b). Distinct groupings are apparent for even N0, despite wide-ranging numbers of silver cations
(Figure 2a; for N0 = 6, N ranges from
6 to 10). A histogram of N0 (Figure 2b) displays marked enhancement at even values. Thus,
it appears that even magic numbers of N0 correspond to enhanced abundances of Ag-DNA species, regardless of N+. Additionally,
brightly fluorescent Ag-DNA (colored
circles in Figure 2a; RGB colors match peak
fluorescence) demonstrate color groupings, with green and red clusters
grouped separately, mirroring the histogram color peaks in Figure 1b.
Figure 2
(a,b) Neutral Ag atom numbers, N0,
extracted from previous Ag-DNA size data[7] and (c,d) measured for select 10-base well plate
strands that produced bright fluorescence and HPLC-stable products.
(a,c) N0 vs N for HPLC-purified
Ag-DNA, determined by MS. Brightly fluorescent
clusters are indicated by colored dots; RGB colors match fluorescence
wavelength (IR-emitting clusters are gray). Black data points represent
Ag-DNA that were not measurably fluorescent
but still sizable by MS. Vertical error bars are standard errors in
the cluster charge, N+, and horizontal
error bars represent uncertainty in N. (b,d) Histograms
of N0 values show abundances of clusters
with even N0. Magic numbers predicted
by the spherical superatom model (dashed lines) differ from those
observed for Ag-DNA.
(a,b) Neutral Ag atom numbers, N0,
extracted from previous Ag-DNA size data[7] and (c,d) measured for select 10-base well plate
strands that produced bright fluorescence and HPLC-stable products.
(a,c) N0 vs N for HPLC-purified
Ag-DNA, determined by MS. Brightly fluorescent
clusters are indicated by colored dots; RGB colors match fluorescence
wavelength (IR-emitting clusters are gray). Black data points represent
Ag-DNA that were not measurably fluorescent
but still sizable by MS. Vertical error bars are standard errors in
the cluster charge, N+, and horizontal
error bars represent uncertainty in N. (b,d) Histograms
of N0 values show abundances of clusters
with even N0. Magic numbers predicted
by the spherical superatom model (dashed lines) differ from those
observed for Ag-DNA.We selected three 10-base strands that produced bright fluorescence
to investigate whether Ag-DNA forming
on 10-base template strands also contain the magic numbers of N0 exhibited in Figure 2a,b and lie in the same magic color bands. Aliquots of the main synthesis
products were collected by HPLC separation and examined by negative
ion MS (electrospray ionization) (see Supporting
Information). Figure 2c,d shows that
Ag-DNA formed by these strands, both
fluorescent and dark, indeed shows an overwhelming propensity for
even N0, and that colors lie in the same
bands exhibited in Figure 2a. (If the neutral
silver atoms were not included in a single cluster, there would be
no reason for color to red-shift with larger N0, a trend that is clear in Figure 2 and is discussed in more detail in ref (7)).To better understand the magic nature
of certain N0 rather than certain N, we consider
the well-studied spherical, ligand-stabilized gold clusters.[5] In these “superatoms,” total Au
atom number, N, is not magic because ligands effectively
remove some gold atoms from the cluster.[5] For thiolate- and phosphine-stabilized Au clusters, ligands bind
to surface Au atoms and withdraw a fraction of the cluster’s
electrons, forming protective units around the cluster and leaving
behind a magic number of electrons, and thus neutral gold atoms, in the cluster core.[4,5] Magic numbers
of these core electrons are predicted by electronic shell closings
in the spherical “superatom” model. While ligand-stabilized
silver clusters developed much later than their gold counterparts,[30,31] the existence of magic number silver clusters was recently established
using thiolate ligands.[32−34]For DNA-stabilized silver
clusters, the most prominent magic numbers
of neutral Ag atoms observed are 4 and 6 (Figure 2), not 2 and 8 as predicted by the spherical “superatom”
model (dashed lines, Figure 2b,d). For nonspherical
clusters, superatom magic numbers no longer hold special significance
due to lifting of degeneracies by spherical symmetry breaking,[35] such as cluster reshaping by ligand–metal
interactions.[36] Instead, the ellipsoidal
shell model predicts even–odd oscillation of stability as a
function of metal cluster atom number,[35] as we observe in Figure 2. The distinct magic
numbers of Ag-DNA, relative to spherical
gold clusters, thus indicate nonspherical cluster shapes.Because
silver cations are thought to bind to ring nitrogens in
DNA bases,[6,27] we infer that base-Ag+ complexes
act as ligand units, analogous to thiolate- and phosphine-bonded Au
units. One crucial difference is that DNA presents multiple base ligands
arrayed along a line-like backbone, which could favor elongated, rod-like
cluster shapes, as are also needed to account for the optical properties
of Ag-DNA.[7] This suggests a quasi-linear perimeter of base-attached Ag+ around a rod-like cluster that exhibits enhanced abundances at even
magic numbers of neutral Ag atoms.We now turn to the relation
between color distribution and magic
numbers. Ag-DNA from the two prominent
peaks in Figure 1a, centered at 540 and 630
nm, respectively, fall within the high abundances of clusters having N0 = 4 and N0 = 6,
respectively (Figure 2c). We thus infer that
“magic” green clusters within the 540 nm color band
correspond to Ag-DNA with N0 = 4, and “magic” red clusters within the
630 nm color band correspond to Ag-DNA
with N0 = 6. This is consistent with a
previously established trend of longer wavelength fluorescence for
Ag-DNA with larger silver clusters[9] and also agrees with the previously sized fluorescent
clusters in Figure 2a: the 7 fluorescent clusters
with N0 = 6 emit within 60 nm of the 630
nm color peak, and the 3 fluorescent clusters with N0 = 4 emit within 25 nm of the 540 nm color peak. Additional
IR emitters in Figure 2a, corresponding to
the near-IR band in Figure 1c, may indicate
another magic N0. IR emitters stabilized
by the 10-base random strands were not detectable with the plate reader,
however, so we make no conjectures here as to the value of N0 for this abundance.The 540 and 630
nm histogram peaks (Figure 1a) have standard
deviations of 20 and 30 nm, respectively. To understand
why the peaks corresponding to magic N0 are so wide, we consider the well-known sensitivity of transition
wavelengths of rod-shaped clusters to cluster aspect ratio and bending.
Thus, a range of aspect ratios and/or curvatures could qualitatively
account for observed color spreads at magic N0. We expect base-Ag+ units to influence color by
determining cluster shape. The existence of dark AgN-DNA
with N0 = 0 and up to six Ag+ (Figure 2a) shows that fluorescent clusters
may also contain Ag+ that are not incorporated into the
base-Ag+ ligand units surrounding the neutral cluster core.
Ag+ content varies from N = 6–9 in red-emitting clusters with N0 = 6, suggesting that up to three Ag+ are associated with bases detached from the cluster, where they
may still affect wavelength by altering the potential seen by the
cluster’s delocalized electrons.Cluster schematics from
AMBER simulations for (a) a green-emitting N0 = 4 Ag-DNA and
(b) a red-emitting N0 = 6 Ag-DNA. (c) AMBER simulations of the N0 = 6 cluster structure after 1 ns for with front and
side views, as compared to (b). Simulations suggest that Ag-DNA may assume curved shapes, influenced by location
of Ag ions. (d) Simulations of a N0 =
6, N = 10 cluster structure
after 1 ns. Additional Ag ions that are not directly bound to the
cluster’s neutral core but still associated with the Ag-DNA complex may cause additional shape and/or
fluorescence wavelength changes, as seen by comparing the shapes of N0 = 6 clusters with 8 Ag+ (Figure
3c) to N0 = 6 clusters with 10 Ag+ (Figure 3c).Figure 3 shows variants on such a
silver
cluster nanorod, adapted from previously suggested structures,[7,37] (AMBER structure generation details in the Supporting
Information(38−43)). Like ligand-protected Au clusters, base-Ag+ units protect
a neutral cluster core containing a magic number of neutral silver
atoms, even N0, due to spin degeneracy
(Figure 3a,b). Ag–Ag bond angle variation
within the core can produce a range of aspect ratios for a fixed N0, avoiding energetically costly changes in
Ag bond length caused by modifying Ag bond angles and base stacking
energies. Molecular dynamics simulations[38] show that clusters may assume curved shapes due to Coulomb interactions,
and addition or subtraction of silver ions near the cluster can modify
cluster shape (Figure 3c,d). We expect that
a combination of such shape factors account for the breadth of histogram
peaks in Figure 1b.
Figure 3
Cluster schematics from
AMBER simulations for (a) a green-emitting N0 = 4 Ag-DNA and
(b) a red-emitting N0 = 6 Ag-DNA. (c) AMBER simulations of the N0 = 6 cluster structure after 1 ns for with front and
side views, as compared to (b). Simulations suggest that Ag-DNA may assume curved shapes, influenced by location
of Ag ions. (d) Simulations of a N0 =
6, N = 10 cluster structure
after 1 ns. Additional Ag ions that are not directly bound to the
cluster’s neutral core but still associated with the Ag-DNA complex may cause additional shape and/or
fluorescence wavelength changes, as seen by comparing the shapes of N0 = 6 clusters with 8 Ag+ (Figure
3c) to N0 = 6 clusters with 10 Ag+ (Figure 3c).
Finally, we consider
the specificity of AgN-DNA color
to the particular DNA template sequence, an important issue for AgN-DNA colorimetric sensing schemes. Our array data studies
show that many distinct sequences produce nearly the same fluorescence
color. In particular, for red emitters we find 26 distinct ten-base
strands that produce the same peak fluorescence color to within 10
nm (see Supporting Information). This will
challenge the development of sensing schemes aimed at distinguishing
the presence of specific sequences amidst a background of other DNA.In conclusion, we observe significantly enhanced abundances of
Ag-DNA stabilized by random DNA oligomers
with fluorescence peaks near 540 and 630 nm. HPLC-MS data shows that
these color groupings correspond to cluster populations with even
numbers of neutral silver atoms, different from magic numbers for
spherical clusters. Due to the dependence of fluorescence wavelength
on neutral silver atom number, magic numbers of silver atoms result
in “magic color” bands. Variants on rod-like cluster
models qualitatively explain the breadth of the color histogram peaks
relative to magic numbers by permitting variations in cluster length
and immediate environment. The existence of such “magic colors”
has implications for the palette available to colorimetric assays
and could be exploited in sensing applications where transitions between
green and red emissive clusters act as signals for a desired process.
Experimental
Methods
Parallel Cluster Synthesis. Random
10-base DNA
sequences were generated by a MATLAB random number generator, excluding
sequences with fewer than 3 C plus G bases. Well-plate format DNA
was ordered presuspended in water with standard desalting from Integrated
DNA Technologies. Several wells contained a control oligomer known
to produce bright fluorescence to confirm proper synthesis. A Beckman
Coulter Biomek 2000 pipetting robot was used to synthesize Ag-DNA at four synthesis conditions: 10 μM
and 20 μM DNA, with [AgNO3]/[DNA] = 5 and 10. Synthesis
was performed at pH 7 in 10 mM NH4OAc, with [NaBH4]/[AgNO3] = 0.5. See Supporting Information for details.Spectral Characterization and Histogram
Fitting. Fluorescence spectra were measured using a Tecan
Infinite 200 PRO
reader and fitted to single Gaussians as a function of energy to extract
spectral parameters using Igor Pro 6, Wavemetrics. Ag-DNA solutions with dim fluorescence or multiple
peaks were excluded from histograms (see Supporting
Information for details). Maximum likelihood estimation fits
to bimodal distributions were performed using MATLAB R2012a.Mass Spectrometry of Silver Clusters. Synthesis
of select bright Ag-DNA was scaled to
1 mL, and products were purified by HPLC and sized by MS to obtain
total silver content, N, and the number of silver
cations, N. For details
and spectra, see Supporting Information.
Authors: Hsin-Chih Yeh; Jaswinder Sharma; Ie-Ming Shih; Dung M Vu; Jennifer S Martinez; James H Werner Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2012-07-10 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Jeffrey T Petty; Chaoyang Fan; Sandra P Story; Bidisha Sengupta; Matthew Sartin; Jung-Cheng Hsiang; Joseph W Perry; Robert M Dickson Journal: J Phys Chem B Date: 2011-05-25 Impact factor: 2.991
Authors: Anil Desireddy; Brian E Conn; Jingshu Guo; Bokwon Yoon; Robert N Barnett; Bradley M Monahan; Kristin Kirschbaum; Wendell P Griffith; Robert L Whetten; Uzi Landman; Terry P Bigioni Journal: Nature Date: 2013-09-04 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Anil Desireddy; Santosh Kumar; Jingshu Guo; Michael D Bolan; Wendell P Griffith; Terry P Bigioni Journal: Nanoscale Date: 2013-02-01 Impact factor: 7.790
Authors: Pablo D Jadzinsky; Guillermo Calero; Christopher J Ackerson; David A Bushnell; Roger D Kornberg Journal: Science Date: 2007-10-19 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Jeffrey T Petty; Orlin O Sergev; Mainak Ganguly; Ian J Rankine; Daniel M Chevrier; Peng Zhang Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2016-03-07 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Steven M Swasey; Leonardo Espinosa Leal; Olga Lopez-Acevedo; James Pavlovich; Elisabeth G Gwinn Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Dries Jonckheere; Eduardo Coutino-Gonzalez; Wouter Baekelant; Bart Bueken; Helge Reinsch; Ivo Stassen; Oliver Fenwick; Fanny Richard; Paolo Samorì; Rob Ameloot; Johan Hofkens; Maarten B J Roeffaers; Dirk E De Vos Journal: J Mater Chem C Mater Date: 2016-03-29 Impact factor: 7.393