Literature DB >> 24803685

Standard Thermodynamic Functions of Tripeptides N-Formyl-l-methionyl-l-leucyl-l-phenylalaninol and N-Formyl-l-methionyl-l-leucyl-l-phenylalanine Methyl Ester.

Alexey V Markin1, Evgeny Markhasin2, Semen S Sologubov1, Natalia N Smirnova1, Robert G Griffin2.   

Abstract

The heat capacities of tripeptides N-formyl-l-methionyl-l-leucyl-l-phenylalaninol (N-f-MLF-OH) and N-formyl-l-methionyl-l-leucyl-l-phenylalanine methyl ester (N-f-MLF-OMe) were measured by precision adiabatic vacuum calorimetry over the temperature range from T = (6 to 350) K. The tripeptides were stable over this temperature range, and no phase change, transformation, association, or thermal decomposition was observed. The standard thermodynamic functions: molar heat capacity Cp,m, enthalpy H(T) - H(0), entropy S(T), and Gibbs energy G(T) - H(0) of peptides were calculated over the range from T = (0 to 350) K. The low-temperature (T ≤ 50 K) heat capacities dependencies were analyzed using the Debye's and the multifractal theories. The standard entropies of formation of peptides at T = 298.15 K were calculated.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24803685      PMCID: PMC3993880          DOI: 10.1021/je400879v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Eng Data        ISSN: 0021-9568            Impact factor:   2.694


Introduction

The investigation of physicochemical properties of amino acids and peptides attracts much attention, since these systems can be used as molecular materials, drugs, and biomimetics.[1] Furthermore, certain peptides are used as model systems to design and test experiments for protein studies.[2,3] For example, tripeptides N-formyl-l-methionyl-l-leucyl-l-phenylalaninol (N-f-MLF-OH) and N-formyl-l-methionyl-l-leucyl-l-phenylalanine methyl ester (N-f-MLF-OMe) have been used in solid state NMR spectroscopy for developing and testing NMR experiments.[4−6] These tripeptides have also been used as models for structural studies.[7] There are no data on heat capacities and thermodynamic properties of these tripeptides found in the literature. Those are, however, necessary as the fundamental data for peptides and proteins and to calculate thermophysical properties for the model system. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to measure heat capacities of tripeptides N-f-MLF-OH and N-f-MLF-OMe over the temperature range from T = (6 to 350) K, to calculate the standard (p = 0.1 MPa) thermodynamic functions C, H(T) – H(0), S(T), and G(T) – H(0), to determine the characteristic temperatures and fractal dimensions D, and to calculate the standard entropies of formation of N-f-MLF-OH (cr) and N-f-MLF-OMe (cr) at T = 298.15 K.

Experimental Section

Synthesis and Characterization of Tripeptides

Tripeptides N-formyl-l-Met-l-Leu-l-Phe-OH (lot 2500845) and N-formyl-l-Met-l-Leu-l-Phe-OMe (lot 1016424) were obtained from Bachem (King of Prussia, PA). Solid state NMR structure and X-ray structure of N-f-MLF-OH and N-f-MLF-OMe were described previously.[7,8] Structural models of the studied samples are presented in Figure 1. The molecular formulas C21H31N3O5S for N-f-MLF-OH and C22H33N3O5S for N-f-MLF-OMe were confirmed by elemental analysis. In accordance with elemental analysis, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and thin layer chromatography (TLC) data, the content of the main compounds in the studied samples was at least 0.99 molar fraction. The information for the studied tripeptides is listed in Table 1.
Figure 1

Structural models of the tripeptides under study. (a) N-formyl-l-Met-l-Leu-l-Phe-OH7; (b) N-formyl-l-Met-l-Leu-l-Phe-OMe8.

Table 1

Sample Information

chemical namesourcestatemole fraction puritypurification methodanalysis method
N-f-MLF-OHaBachem (King of Prussia, PA)powder0.99HPLCc, TLCdTLC
N-f-MLF-OMebBachem (King of Prussia, PA)powder0.99HPLC, TLCTLC

N-f-MLF-OH = N-formyl-l-Met-l-Leu-l-Phe-OH.

N-f-MLF-OMe = N-formyl-l-Met-l-Leu-l-Phe-OMe.

High-performance liquid chromatography.

Thin layer chromatography.

Structural models of the tripeptides under study. (a) N-formyl-l-Met-l-Leu-l-Phe-OH7; (b) N-formyl-l-Met-l-Leu-l-Phe-OMe8. N-f-MLF-OH = N-formyl-l-Met-l-Leu-l-Phe-OH. N-f-MLF-OMe = N-formyl-l-Met-l-Leu-l-Phe-OMe. High-performance liquid chromatography. Thin layer chromatography.

Adiabatic Calorimetry

A precision automatic adiabatic calorimeter (Block Calorimetric Thermophysical, BCT-3) was used to measure heat capacities over the temperature range from T = (6 to 350) K. The design and operation of an adiabatic calorimeter are described in detail elsewhere.[9,10] A calorimetric cell is a thin-walled cylindrical vessel made from titanium with a volume of 1.5·10–6 m3. Its mass is (1.626 ± 0.005) g. A miniature iron–rhodium resistance thermometer (nominal resistance 100 Ω, was calibrated on ITS-90 standard by the Russian Metrology Research Institute, Moscow region, Russia) was used to measure the temperature of the sample. The temperature difference between the ampule and an adiabatic shield was controlled by a four-junction copperiron-chromel thermocouple. The sensitivity of the thermometric circuit was 1·10–3 K, and that of the analog-to-digital converter was 0.1 μV. The accuracy of the calorimeter was verified using standard reference samples (K-2 benzoic acid and α-Al2O3)[11,12] prepared by the Institute of Metrology of the State Standard Committee of the Russian Federation. The deviations of our results from the recommended values of NIST[11] are within 0.02 C between T = (6 to 20) K, 0.005 C between T = (20 to 40) K, and 0.002 C in the temperature range from T = (40 to 350) K. The standard uncertainty for the temperature was u(T) = 0.01 K, and the relative standard uncertainty for the enthalpies of fusion was ur(ΔfusH) = 0.002.

Heat Capacities Measurements

Samples of 0.2438 g of N-f-MLF-OH (M = 437.56 g·mol–1) and 0.2716 g of N-f-MLF-OMe (M = 451.59 g·mol–1) were placed in a calorimetric ampule, and it was then filled with dry helium gas (4 kPa, room temperature) to facilitate the heat exchanging process. Initially, the samples were cooled to the temperature of the measurement onset (∼ 6 K) at a rate of 0.01 K·s–1. Then the samples were heated in (0.5 to 2) K increments at a rate of 0.01 K·s–1. The sample temperature was recorded after an equilibration period (temperature drift < 0.01 K·s–1, approximately 10 min per experimental point). The experimental values of C (157 and 185 points for N-f-MLF-OH and N-f-MLF-OMe, respectively) were collected using liquid helium as a cryogen in the intervals from T = (6 to 88) K/(6 to 91) K (Series 1) and using liquid nitrogen in the intervals from T = (84 to 349) K/(91 to 343) K (Series 2) for N-f-MLF-OH and N-f-MLF-OMe, respectively. Heat capacities of the samples were between (55 to 83) % of the overall heat capacity of the calorimetric ampule. The molar masses were calculated from the IUPAC table of atomic weights.[13]

Results and Discussion

Heat Capacities

Experimental data for the molar heat capacities of N-f-MLF-OH and N-f-MLF-OMe over the temperature range from T = (6 to 350) K are given in Tables 2 and 3 and presented in Figure 2. Heat capacities of the samples rise gradually with temperature increasing. The tripeptides were stable over the studied temperature range, and no phase change, transformation, association, or thermal decomposition was observed.
Table 2

Experimental Molar Heat Capacities of Crystalline N-f-MLF-OH (M = 437.56 g·mol–1)a

T/KCp,m/J·K–1·mol–1T/KCp,m/J·K–1·mol–1T/KCp,m/J·K–1·mol–1
Series 1
6.073.0311.0811.832.8382.65
6.203.3611.5212.535.2190.33
6.393.6111.9513.437.6297.96
6.583.9512.3914.640.05105.2
6.774.1912.8515.842.50112.5
6.954.4613.3117.044.97118.8
7.134.6413.7818.147.45124.6
7.315.0214.2919.549.34130.5
7.665.6414.7621.350.80134.7
7.845.8415.2423.454.20143.5
8.026.2215.7324.7756.90149.6
8.196.5616.2326.4859.00154.9
8.376.6516.7328.1361.10159.7
8.557.1517.2429.6864.20167.0
8.727.4217.7631.4167.25174.4
8.927.8818.2932.4869.89180.6
9.108.1618.8134.2572.43186.4
9.278.5719.3436.2475.35193.1
9.448.9419.8738.4777.93197.9
9.629.3821.3744.1680.00202.2
9.809.5923.5751.7383.20207.8
9.9810.025.8459.4185.77213.1
10.2610.528.1467.2987.50216.0
10.6711.030.4775.15  
Series 2
83.90210.0179.11375.4267.60507.4
86.84215.7181.51379.4270.95513.7
90.20221.9182.44381.6273.80518.1
93.70228.4185.90386.5277.59524.9
96.85234.0188.64391.0280.88532.5
100.96241.6192.20397.2282.23537.3
104.77248.7195.77402.6285.29542.7
110.00259.0199.33408.1288.58549.3
114.57267.0200.73410.2293.30557.4
118.10273.3204.09414.5297.80565.3
121.64279.0207.65420.2301.54573.1
125.17285.5211.20423.3304.73582.3
128.71291.7214.75429.4307.89588.5
132.24297.1218.30433.6311.05593.5
135.78303.1220.18436.8313.20599.5
139.31309.8223.47441.4316.00602.2
142.85315.6226.98445.4318.33605.8
146.39321.0230.48451.2321.40610.8
149.76327.1234.30456.4323.50615.2
153.11331.8238.80462.3326.18619.5
156.66336.9242.45469.1329.70626.6
158.99341.8244.90472.6331.99630.9
162.34347.3246.30474.8334.86638.4
165.75352.2247.70474.8337.66643.6
169.10358.5250.00478.6340.47648.2
171.03363.2253.99484.7342.70653.7
174.39366.7257.43489.4346.02662.6
176.01369.0260.84494.6348.70668.4
177.95374.1264.24501.0  

Standard uncertainty for temperature u(T) = 0.01 K and relative standard uncertainty for the heat capacities ur(C) = 0.02 in the temperature range from T = (6 to 15) K, ur(C) = 0.005 between T = (15 to 40) K, and ur(C) = 0.002 in the temperature range from T = (40 to 349) K.

Table 3

Experimental Molar Heat Capacities of Crystalline N-f-MLF-OMe (M = 451.59 g·mol–1)a

T/KCp,m/J·K–1·mol–1T/KCp,m/J·K–1·mol–1T/KCp,m/J·K–1·mol–1
Series 1
6.022.6010.2713.232.6588.71
6.132.7110.6314.135.0496.64
6.282.9111.0415.037.44105.0
6.433.2111.4516.039.87112.9
6.593.5211.8817.142.32120.6
6.733.8812.2918.044.78127.7
6.884.2912.7919.247.26134.1
7.044.5613.2420.449.75139.9
7.194.9713.7121.752.01145.9
7.355.4214.1822.754.78153.1
7.525.8314.6524.157.30160.1
7.666.2815.1225.359.87167.1
7.846.7315.6026.7862.41174.3
7.987.2315.9928.0064.96181.3
8.177.7216.6429.8566.90186.5
8.338.1317.1031.5870.06194.1
8.508.5817.6233.2472.60201.0
8.709.0818.1034.7975.15206.0
8.849.4818.7837.2177.73212.1
8.989.8919.2238.7580.10216.1
9.1310.319.7240.5982.93221.7
9.3010.721.4147.3285.50227.0
9.4511.023.4055.2088.20232.3
9.6211.525.6763.4590.85237.1
9.7811.827.9671.89  
9.9512.330.2980.50  
Series 2
90.60238.4176.09381.5254.83514.5
93.51243.4179.50385.9257.07518.7
96.19248.8182.11390.6259.30523.3
98.88253.3184.71394.8261.50528.0
101.58258.9187.31398.3263.68532.6
104.28264.0189.90402.2265.84535.2
106.98269.4192.49407.4267.99539.2
109.69274.9195.07411.8270.16543.2
112.38279.5197.64416.1272.34547.3
115.08284.3200.20420.0274.50552.1
117.78289.3202.74423.8276.67554.9
120.47293.3205.27428.2277.10557.8
123.16297.5207.77433.6279.97561.2
125.85302.5210.28436.5282.11564.9
128.53306.7212.77442.5284.23568.8
131.22310.6215.23446.4286.34571.5
133.99316.2217.60450.8288.80578.0
136.67319.1220.02455.6290.49581.0
139.35323.5222.40459.1292.53584.6
142.02328.1224.71463.1294.54587.8
144.68332.5227.02467.1296.39591.6
147.35336.5229.33471.1298.40596.2
150.01340.6231.66475.2300.24601.4
152.68344.7234.00478.4302.09606.6
155.33348.5236.36484.2304.77614.7
157.99352.9238.72488.0307.42619.1
160.64357.2241.09490.9309.83624.8
163.28361.6243.46493.2312.19631.0
165.92365.7245.83498.9314.41635.0
168.56368.7248.18503.0316.68638.7
171.19373.7250.50507.1318.91645.4
174.60377.8252.78509.6321.09652.2
323.22661.1332.75688.8340.17710.6
325.19665.5334.50691.9341.74717.0
327.12669.6335.18695.0343.27723.9
329.13677.2336.88700.5  
330.96681.9338.54704.4  

Standard uncertainty for temperature u(T) = 0.01 K and relative standard uncertainty for the heat capacities ur(C) = 0.02 in the temperature range from T = (6 to 15) K, ur(C) = 0.005 between T = (15 to 40) K, and ur(C) = 0.002 in the temperature range from T = (40 to 343) K.

Figure 2

Experimental molar heat capacities C of the tripeptides under study. Red line, N-formyl-l-Met-l-Leu-l-Phe-OH; green line, N-formyl-l-Met-l-Leu-l-Phe-OMe.

Experimental molar heat capacities C of the tripeptides under study. Red line, N-formyl-l-Met-l-Leu-l-Phe-OH; green line, N-formyl-l-Met-l-Leu-l-Phe-OMe. Standard uncertainty for temperature u(T) = 0.01 K and relative standard uncertainty for the heat capacities ur(C) = 0.02 in the temperature range from T = (6 to 15) K, ur(C) = 0.005 between T = (15 to 40) K, and ur(C) = 0.002 in the temperature range from T = (40 to 349) K. Standard uncertainty for temperature u(T) = 0.01 K and relative standard uncertainty for the heat capacities ur(C) = 0.02 in the temperature range from T = (6 to 15) K, ur(C) = 0.005 between T = (15 to 40) K, and ur(C) = 0.002 in the temperature range from T = (40 to 343) K. The experimental data were smoothed using least-squares polynomial fits as follows:where A and B are polynomial coefficients. Relative standard uncertainty for the heat capacities ur(C) = 0.006 in the temperature range from T = (6 to 40) K and ur(C) = 0.003 between T = (40 to 350) K. The relative deviations of experimental data from the smoothing functions were listed in Figure 3.
Figure 3

Plot of deviations of experimental data from fitted. Red ○, N-formyl-l-Met-l-Leu-l-Phe-OH; green △, N-formyl-l-Met-l-Leu-l-Phe-OMe.

Plot of deviations of experimental data from fitted. Red ○, N-formyl-l-Met-l-Leu-l-Phe-OH; green △, N-formyl-l-Met-l-Leu-l-Phe-OMe. The temperature dependencies of heat capacities of the two tripeptides are similar below 50 K. This tendency can be expected, since skeletal vibrations provide the main contribution to heat capacities in this range. Low-temperature heat capacities data were also analyzed using the Debye theory[14] and the multifractal theory of heat capacity.[15] According to the fractal theory,[15] Equation 1 can be written as eq 2:where D is the fractal dimension, N is the number of atoms in a molecular unit, k is the Boltzmann constant, γ(D + 1) is the γ-function, ξ(D + 1) is the Riemann ξ-function, and Θmax is the characteristic temperature. For a particular solid 3D(D + 1)kNγ(D + 1)ξ(D + 1)(1/Θmax) = A is a constant value, and eq 2 can be rewritten as follows:which can be used to obtain D and Θmax. Since below T = 50 K the experimental values of C are equal to Cv. Thus, experimental data in the range from T = (20 to 50) K were used and yielded D = 1.6, Θmax = 202.8 K for N-f-MLF-OH, and D = 1.8, Θmax = 183.0 K for N-f-MLF-OMe. The relative standard uncertainty for the characteristic temperatures is ur(Θmax) = 0.007. According to the multifractal model of the theory of heat capacity of solids,[15]D = 1 corresponds to solids with a chain structure, D = 2 corresponds to ones with a layered structure, and D = 3 corresponds to ones with a spatial structure, characterized by comparable interactions in all three dimensions. The obtained values of D point to the chain-layered structure for both tripeptides. The Debye theory was used to fit the experimental data in the range from T = (6 to 12) K and extrapolate it to 0 K.[14]where D is the symbol of Debye’s function and n and Θ are specially selected parameters. Using this equation, we obtained n = 6 for both tripeptides, Θ = 56.7 K for N-f-MLF-OH and Θ = 62.2 K for N-f-MLF-OMe. Using the above parameters, eq 4 describes the C values of the compounds over the range from T = (6 to 12) K with relative standard uncertainty ur(C) = 0.013. In subsequent calculations, we assumed that eq 4 described the heat capacity in the range from T = (0 to 6) K with the same relative standard uncertainty.

Standard Thermodynamic Functions

The calculations of H(T) – H(0) and S(T) were made by numerical integration of the curves of heat capacities with respect to T and ln T, respectively (Tables 4 and 5). Gibbs energy G(T) – H(0) was calculated from enthalpy and entropy values. The residual entropies of N-f-MLF-OH and N-f-MLF-OMe were assumed to be zero. The calculation procedure was described in detail elsewhere.[16]
Table 4

Smoothed Molar Heat Capacities and Thermodynamic Functions of Crystalline N-f-MLF-OH (M = 437.56 g·mol–1) at Pressure p = 0.1 MPaa

 Cp,m[H(T) – H(0)]S(T)–[G(T) – H(0)]
T/KJ·K–1·mol–1kJ·mol–1J·K–1·mol–1kJ·mol–1
51.750.002180.5880.000736
109.910.02974.070.0110
1522.20.10610.10.0452
2038.840.258118.730.1165
2556.770.498129.360.2358
3073.310.823441.170.4118
40105.11.72066.750.9502
50132.62.90793.131.749
60157.14.358119.52.813
70180.96.049145.54.139
80202.17.966171.15.722
90221.410.08196.07.558
100240.112.39220.39.641
110258.714.89244.111.96
120276.517.56267.414.52
130293.620.41290.117.31
140310.223.43312.520.32
150326.826.62334.523.56
160343.629.97356.127.01
170360.333.49377.530.68
180376.937.18398.534.56
190393.041.03419.438.65
200408.445.03439.942.95
210422.949.19460.247.45
220436.853.49480.252.15
230450.357.93499.957.05
240464.262.50519.462.15
250478.767.21538.667.44
260494.572.08557.772.92
270511.977.11576.778.59
280530.882.32595.684.45
290550.987.73614.690.50
298.15567.692.29630.195.57
300571.393.34633.696.74
310591.299.16652.7103.2
320609.9105.2671.7109.8
330627.7111.4690.8116.6
340647.1117.7709.8123.6
348667.6123.0725.1129.4

Standard uncertainty for temperature u(T) = 0.01 K and relative standard uncertainty for the heat capacities ur(C) = 0.02 in the temperature range from T = (6 to 15) K, ur(C) = 0.005 between T = (15 to 40) K, and ur(C) = 0.002 in the temperature range from T = (40 to 348) K.

Table 5

Smoothed Molar Heat Capacities and Thermodynamic Functions of Crystalline N-f-MLF-OMe (M = 451.59 g·mol–1) at Pressure p = 0.1 MPaa

 Cp,m[H(T) – H(0)]S(T)–[G(T) – H(0)]
T/KJ·K–1·mol–1kJ·mol–1J·K–1·mol–1kJ·mol–1
51.990.002490.6640.000831
1012.50.03424.630.0121
1525.10.12712.00.0528
2041.760.292121.370.1354
2561.130.549532.770.2697
3079.280.900945.540.4652
40113.31.86773.101.057
50140.83.145101.51.931
60167.64.683129.53.086
70194.36.496157.44.520
80216.18.552184.86.231
90236.310.81211.48.213
100256.413.28237.410.46
110275.615.94262.712.96
120292.918.78287.415.71
130309.121.79311.518.70
140324.724.96335.021.94
150340.128.29357.925.40
160355.631.77380.429.09
170371.335.40402.433.01
180387.339.19424.137.14
190403.743.15445.541.49
200420.347.27466.646.05
210437.251.55487.550.82
220454.356.03508.255.80
230471.660.64528.860.98
240489.065.44549.266.38
250506.570.42569.671.97
260524.375.58589.877.77
270542.480.91609.983.76
280561.186.43630.089.96
290580.792.13650.096.36
298.15597.696.94666.3101.7
300601.698.05670.0103.0
310624.4104.2690.1109.8
320649.7110.5710.3116.8
330678.4117.2730.8124.0
340711.3124.1751.5131.4
344726.0127.0759.9134.4

Standard uncertainty for temperature u(T) = 0.01 K and relative standard uncertainty for the heat capacities ur(C) = 0.02 in the temperature range from T = (6 to 15) K, ur(C) = 0.005 between T = (15 to 40) K, and ur(C) = 0.002 in the temperature range from T = (40 to 344) K.

Standard uncertainty for temperature u(T) = 0.01 K and relative standard uncertainty for the heat capacities ur(C) = 0.02 in the temperature range from T = (6 to 15) K, ur(C) = 0.005 between T = (15 to 40) K, and ur(C) = 0.002 in the temperature range from T = (40 to 348) K. Standard uncertainty for temperature u(T) = 0.01 K and relative standard uncertainty for the heat capacities ur(C) = 0.02 in the temperature range from T = (6 to 15) K, ur(C) = 0.005 between T = (15 to 40) K, and ur(C) = 0.002 in the temperature range from T = (40 to 344) K. Using the values of absolute entropies of tripeptides N-f-MLF-OH and N-f-MLF-OMe and that of elemental substances, including carbon,[17] hydrogen,[18] nitrogen,[17] oxygen,[18] and sulfur,[18] the standard entropies of formation were calculated: The obtained values fit the equations:where cr, gr, and g are crystal, graphite, and gas, respectively.

Conclusions

This work reports heat capacities of crystalline tripeptides N-formyl-l-Met-l-Leu-l-Phe-OH and N-formyl-l-Met-l-Leu-l-Phe-OMe measured over the range from T = (6 to 350) K by precise adiabatic vacuum calorimetry. The standard thermodynamic functions of N-f-MLF-OH and N-f-MLF-OMe over the range from T = (0 to 350) K and the standard entropies of formation at T = 298.15 K were calculated. The low-temperature (T ≤ 50 K) dependencies of heat capacities were analyzed using the Debye’s and the multifractal theories, and a chain-layered structures topology was established.
  6 in total

1.  De novo determination of peptide structure with solid-state magic-angle spinning NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Chad M Rienstra; Lisa Tucker-Kellogg; Christopher P Jaroniec; Morten Hohwy; Bernd Reif; Michael T McMahon; Bruce Tidor; Tomas Lozano-Pérez; Robert G Griffin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Crystal structure, conformation, and potential energy calculations of the chemotactic peptide N-formyl-L-Met-L-Leu-L-Phe-OMe.

Authors:  E Gavuzzo; F Mazza; G Pochetti; A Scatturin
Journal:  Int J Pept Protein Res       Date:  1989-11

3.  High-resolution solid-state NMR structure of alanyl-prolyl-glycine.

Authors:  Alexander B Barnes; Loren B Andreas; Matthias Huber; Ramesh Ramachandran; Patrick C A van der Wel; Mikhail Veshtort; Robert G Griffin; Manish A Mehta
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  3D TEDOR NMR experiments for the simultaneous measurement of multiple carbon-nitrogen distances in uniformly (13)C,(15)N-labeled solids.

Authors:  Christopher P Jaroniec; Claudiu Filip; Robert G Griffin
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2002-09-11       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Observation of a low-temperature, dynamically driven structural transition in a polypeptide by solid-state NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Vikram S Bajaj; Patrick C A van der Wel; Robert G Griffin
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  (15)N-(15)N proton assisted recoupling in magic angle spinning NMR.

Authors:  Józef R Lewandowski; Gaël De Paëpe; Matthew T Eddy; Robert G Griffin
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 15.419

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Low-temperature polymorphic phase transition in a crystalline tripeptide L-Ala-L-Pro-Gly·H2O revealed by adiabatic calorimetry.

Authors:  Alexey V Markin; Evgeny Markhasin; Semen S Sologubov; Qing Zhe Ni; Natalia N Smirnova; Robert G Griffin
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 2.991

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.