Literature DB >> 24803513

Development and validation of an ex vivo electron paramagnetic resonance fingernail biodosimetric method.

Xiaoming He1, Steven G Swarts2, Eugene Demidenko3, Ann B Flood3, Oleg Grinberg3, Jiang Gui3, Michael Mariani3, Stephen D Marsh4, Andres E Ruuge3, Jason W Sidabras5, Dmitry Tipikin3, Dean E Wilcox6, Harold M Swartz3.   

Abstract

There is an imperative need to develop methods that can rapidly and accurately determine individual exposure to radiation for screening (triage) populations and guiding medical treatment in an emergency response to a large-scale radiological/nuclear event. To this end, a number of methods that rely on dose-dependent chemical and/or physical alterations in biomaterials or biological responses are in various stages of development. One such method, ex vivo electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) nail dosimetry using human nail clippings, is a physical biodosimetry technique that takes advantage of a stable radiation-induced signal (RIS) in the keratin matrix of fingernails and toenails. This dosimetry method has the advantages of ubiquitous availability of the dosimetric material, easy and non-invasive sampling, and the potential for immediate and rapid dose assessment. The major challenge for ex vivo EPR nail dosimetry is the overlap of mechanically induced signals and the RIS. The difficulties of analysing the mixed EPR spectra of a clipped irradiated nail were addressed in the work described here. The following key factors lead to successful spectral analysis and dose assessment in ex vivo EPR nail dosimetry: (1) obtaining a thorough understanding of the chemical nature, the decay behaviour, and the microwave power dependence of the EPR signals, as well as the influence of variation in temperature, humidity, water content, and O₂ level; (2) control of the variability among individual samples to achieve consistent shape and kinetics of the EPR spectra; (3) use of correlations between the multiple spectral components; and (4) use of optimised modelling and fitting of the EPR spectra to improve the accuracy and precision of the dose estimates derived from the nail spectra. In the work described here, two large clipped nail datasets were used to test the procedures and the spectral fitting model of the results obtained with it. A 15-donor nail set with 90 nail samples from 15 donors was used to validate the sample handling and spectral analysis methods that have been developed but without the interference of a native background signal. Good consistency has been obtained between the actual RIS and the estimated RIS computed from spectral analysis. In addition to the success in RIS estimation, a linear dose response has also been achieved for all individuals in this study, where the radiation dose ranges from 0 to 6 Gy. A second 16-donor nail set with 96 nail samples was used to test the spectral fitting model where the background signal was included during the fitting of the clipped nail spectra data. Although the dose response for the estimated and actual RIS calculated in both donor nail sets was similar, there was an increased variability in the RIS values that was likely due to the variability in the background signal between donors. Although the current methods of sample handling and spectral analysis show good potential for estimating the RIS in the EPR spectra of nail clippings, there is a remaining degree of variability in the RIS estimate that needs to be addressed; this should be achieved by identifying and accounting for demographic sources of variability in the background nail signal and the composition of the nail matrix.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24803513      PMCID: PMC4095917          DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncu129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  22 in total

1.  Advances towards using finger/toenail dosimetry to triage a large population after potential exposure to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Xiaoming He; Jiang Gui; Thomas P Matthews; Benjamin B Williams; Steven G Swarts; Oleg Grinberg; Jason Sidabras; Dean E Wilcox; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.898

2.  Lauriston S. Taylor Lecture: Radiation protection in the aftermath of a terrorist attack involving exposure to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Abel J González
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  Fingernail dosimetry: current status and perspectives.

Authors:  Alex Romanyukha; Ricardo A Reyes; Francois Trompier; Luis A Benevides
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.316

4.  Electron paramagnetic resonance in human fingernails: the sponge model implication.

Authors:  R A Reyes; A Romanyukha; F Trompier; C A Mitchell; I Clairand; T De; L A Benevides; H M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Electron paramagnetic resonance in irradiated fingernails: variability of dose dependence and possibilities of initial dose assessment.

Authors:  R A Reyes; Alexander Romanyukha; C Olsen; F Trompier; L A Benevides
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Sulphur radicals formed by cutting alpha-keratin.

Authors:  H Chandra; M C Symons
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Aug 27-Sep 2       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Radiation-induced signals analysed by EPR spectrometry applied to fortuitous dosimetry.

Authors:  François Trompier; Celine Bassinet; Albrecht Wieser; Cinzia De Angelis; Daniela Viscomi; Paola Fattibene
Journal:  Ann Ist Super Sanita       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.663

8.  Dosimetry based on EPR spectral analysis of fingernail clippings.

Authors:  Dean E Wilcox; Xiaoming He; Jiang Gui; Andres E Ruuge; Hongbin Li; Benjamin B Williams; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.316

9.  Development of in vivo tooth EPR for individual radiation dose estimation and screening.

Authors:  Benjamin B Williams; Ruhong Dong; Maciej Kmiec; Greg Burke; Eugene Demidenko; David Gladstone; Roberto J Nicolalde; Artur Sucheta; Piotr Lesniewski; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.316

10.  Raman spectroscopy of the human nail: a potential tool for evaluating bone health?

Authors:  M R Towler; A Wren; N Rushe; J Saunders; N M Cummins; P M Jakeman
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 4.727

View more
  10 in total

1.  Evaluating the Special Needs of The Military for Radiation Biodosimetry for Tactical Warfare Against Deployed Troops: Comparing Military to Civilian Needs for Biodosimetry Methods.

Authors:  Ann Barry Flood; Arif N Ali; Holly K Boyle; Gaixin Du; Victoria A Satinsky; Steven G Swarts; Benjamin B Williams; Eugene Demidenko; Wilson Schreiber; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.316

2.  Advances in a framework to compare bio-dosimetry methods for triage in large-scale radiation events.

Authors:  Ann Barry Flood; Holly K Boyle; Gaixin Du; Eugene Demidenko; Roberto J Nicolalde; Benjamin B Williams; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Dielectric-Backed Aperture Resonators for X-Band in vivo EPR Nail Dosimetry.

Authors:  Oleg Grinberg; Jason W Sidabras; Dmitriy S Tipikin; Vladimir Krymov; Michael Mariani; Matthew M Feldman; Maciej M Kmiec; Sergey V Petryakov; Spencer Brugger; Brandon Carr; Wilson Schreiber; Steven G Swarts; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 4.  Using Stable Free Radicals to Obtain Unique and Clinically Useful Data In Vivo in Human Subjects.

Authors:  Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 0.972

5.  Emergency EPR dosimetry technique using vacuum-stored dry nails.

Authors:  S Sholom; S W S McKeever
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 1.898

6.  Developments in Biodosimetry Methods for Triage With a Focus on X-band Electron Paramagnetic Resonance In Vivo Fingernail Dosimetry.

Authors:  Steven G Swarts; Jason W Sidabras; Oleg Grinberg; Dmitriy S Tipikin; Maciej M Kmiec; Sergey V Petryakov; Wilson Schreiber; Victoria A Wood; Benjamin B Williams; Ann Barry Flood; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.316

7.  Stability of X-band EPR signals from fingernails under vacuum storage.

Authors:  Sergey Sholom; Stephen McKeever
Journal:  Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 2.858

Review 8.  Overview of the principles and practice of biodosimetry.

Authors:  Harold M Swartz; Benjamin B Williams; Ann Barry Flood
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  Calculation of dose conversion factors for doses in the fingernails to organ doses at external gamma irradiation in air.

Authors:  A M Khailov; A I Ivannikov; V G Skvortsov; V F Stepanenko; S P Orlenko; A B Flood; B B Williams; H M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2015-11-01       Impact factor: 1.898

Review 10.  Scientific and Logistical Considerations When Screening for Radiation Risks by Using Biodosimetry Based on Biological Effects of Radiation Rather than Dose: The Need for Prior Measurements of Homogeneity and Distribution of Dose.

Authors:  Harold M Swartz; Ann Barry Flood; Vijay K Singh; Steven G Swarts
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.922

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.