Literature DB >> 24519326

Overview of the principles and practice of biodosimetry.

Harold M Swartz1, Benjamin B Williams, Ann Barry Flood.   

Abstract

The principle of biodosimetry is to utilize changes induced in the individual by ionizing radiation to estimate the dose and, if possible, to predict or reflect the clinically relevant response, i.e., the biological consequences of the dose. Ideally, the changes should be specific for ionizing radiation, and the response should be unaffected by prior medical or physiological variations among subjects, including changes that might be caused by the stress and trauma from a radiation event. There are two basic types of biodosimetry with different and often complementary characteristics: those based on changes in biological parameters such as gene activation or chromosomal abnormalities and those based on physical changes in tissues (detected by techniques such as EPR). In this paper, we consider the applicability of the various techniques for different scenarios: small- and large-scale exposures to levels of radiation that could lead to the acute radiation syndrome and exposures with lower doses that do not need immediate care, but should be followed for evidence of long-term consequences. The development of biodosimetry has been especially stimulated by the needs after a large-scale event where it is essential to have a means to identify those individuals who would benefit from being brought into the medical care system. Analyses of the conventional methods officially recommended for responding to such events indicate that these methods are unlikely to achieve the results needed for timely triage of thousands of victims. Emerging biodosimetric methods can fill this critically important gap.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24519326      PMCID: PMC5982531          DOI: 10.1007/s00411-014-0522-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  47 in total

Review 1.  EPR dosimetry with tooth enamel: A review.

Authors:  Paola Fattibene; Freddy Callens
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 2.  Current status of biodosimetry based on standard cytogenetic methods.

Authors:  Marcela Maria Pereira de Lemos Pinto; Neyliane Frassinetti Gonçalves Santos; Ademir Amaral
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 3.  Retrospective assessment of radiation exposure using biological dosimetry: chromosome painting, electron paramagnetic resonance and the glycophorin a mutation assay.

Authors:  R A Kleinerman; A A Romanyukha; D A Schauer; J D Tucker
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Estimating radiation dose from time to emesis and lymphocyte depletion.

Authors:  Denise D Parker; Jack C Parker
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.316

5.  Laboratory intercomparison of the dicentric chromosome analysis assay.

Authors:  C Beinke; S Barnard; H Boulay-Greene; A De Amicis; S De Sanctis; F Herodin; A Jones; U Kulka; F Lista; D Lloyd; P Martigne; J Moquet; U Oestreicher; H Romm; K Rothkamm; M Valente; V Meineke; H Braselmann; M Abend
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Rapid radiation dose assessment for radiological public health emergencies: roles of NIAID and BARDA.

Authors:  Marcy B Grace; Brian R Moyer; Joanna Prasher; Kenneth D Cliffer; Narayani Ramakrishnan; Joseph Kaminski; C Norman Coleman; Ronald G Manning; Bert W Maidment; Richard Hatchett
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 7.  Radiation metabolomics and its potential in biodosimetry.

Authors:  Stephen L Coy; Amrita K Cheema; John B Tyburski; Evagelia C Laiakis; Sean P Collins; Albert Fornace
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 2.694

8.  Adapting the γ-H2AX assay for automated processing in human lymphocytes. 1. Technological aspects.

Authors:  Helen C Turner; David J Brenner; Youhua Chen; Antonella Bertucci; Jian Zhang; Hongliang Wang; Oleksandra V Lyulko; Yanping Xu; Igor Shuryak; Julia Schaefer; Nabil Simaan; Gerhard Randers-Pehrson; Y Lawrence Yao; Sally A Amundson; Guy Garty
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Comparison of established and emerging biodosimetry assays.

Authors:  K Rothkamm; C Beinke; H Romm; C Badie; Y Balagurunathan; S Barnard; N Bernard; H Boulay-Greene; M Brengues; A De Amicis; S De Sanctis; R Greither; F Herodin; A Jones; S Kabacik; T Knie; U Kulka; F Lista; P Martigne; A Missel; J Moquet; U Oestreicher; A Peinnequin; T Poyot; U Roessler; H Scherthan; B Terbrueggen; H Thierens; M Valente; A Vral; F Zenhausern; V Meineke; H Braselmann; M Abend
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  The RABIT: a rapid automated biodosimetry tool for radiological triage.

Authors:  Guy Garty; Youhua Chen; Alessio Salerno; Helen Turner; Jian Zhang; Oleksandra Lyulko; Antonella Bertucci; Yanping Xu; Hongliang Wang; Nabil Simaan; Gerhard Randers-Pehrson; Y Lawrence Yao; Sally A Amundson; David J Brenner
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.316

View more
  28 in total

1.  Evaluating the Special Needs of The Military for Radiation Biodosimetry for Tactical Warfare Against Deployed Troops: Comparing Military to Civilian Needs for Biodosimetry Methods.

Authors:  Ann Barry Flood; Arif N Ali; Holly K Boyle; Gaixin Du; Victoria A Satinsky; Steven G Swarts; Benjamin B Williams; Eugene Demidenko; Wilson Schreiber; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 2.  Nonhuman primates as models for the discovery and development of radiation countermeasures.

Authors:  Vijay K Singh; Ayodele O Olabisi
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 6.098

3.  EPRBioDose 2013: EPR applications and biological dosimetry.

Authors:  A Wieser; F Darroudi
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 4.  Factors Affecting the Quality of Tooth Enamel for In Vivo EPR-Based Retrospective Biodosimetry.

Authors:  Céline M Desmet; Philippe Levêque; Bernard Gallez
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 0.972

5.  The Application and Distribution of Magnetic Field Modulation in the Detection Apertures of X-band EPR Cavities for In Vivo Tooth Dosimetry.

Authors:  Junwang Guo; Jierui Zou; Guofu Dong; Lei Ma; Jianbo Cong; Kai Fan; Guoshan Yang; Ke Wu
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 0.972

6.  Dielectric-Backed Aperture Resonators for X-Band in vivo EPR Nail Dosimetry.

Authors:  Oleg Grinberg; Jason W Sidabras; Dmitriy S Tipikin; Vladimir Krymov; Michael Mariani; Matthew M Feldman; Maciej M Kmiec; Sergey V Petryakov; Spencer Brugger; Brandon Carr; Wilson Schreiber; Steven G Swarts; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 7.  Using Stable Free Radicals to Obtain Unique and Clinically Useful Data In Vivo in Human Subjects.

Authors:  Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 0.972

8.  Imaging tooth enamel using zero echo time (ZTE) magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Kevin M Rychert; Gang Zhu; Maciej M Kmiec; Venkata K Nemani; Benjamin B Williams; Ann Barry Flood; Harold M Swartz; Barjor Gimi
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2015-03-19

9.  POSSIBLE NATURE OF THE RADIATION-INDUCED SIGNAL IN NAILS: HIGH-FIELD EPR, CONFIRMING CHEMICAL SYNTHESIS, AND QUANTUM CHEMICAL CALCULATIONS.

Authors:  Dmitriy S Tipikin; Steven G Swarts; Jason W Sidabras; François Trompier; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 0.972

10.  A Coaxial Dielectric Probe Technique for Distinguishing Tooth Enamel from Dental Resin.

Authors:  Paul M Meaney; Benjamin B Williams; Shireen D Geimer; Ann B Flood; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Adv Biomed Eng Res       Date:  2015
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.