Literature DB >> 19521713

Electron paramagnetic resonance in irradiated fingernails: variability of dose dependence and possibilities of initial dose assessment.

R A Reyes1, Alexander Romanyukha, C Olsen, F Trompier, L A Benevides.   

Abstract

The results of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements in irradiated fingernails are presented. In total, 83 samples of different fingernails were studied. Five different groups of samples were selected based on the collection time of fingernail samples, their level of mechanical stress, and the number and size of clippings: (1) recently (<24 h) cut, irradiated and measured with EPR without any treatment of samples, and with rigorous control of size and number of clippings (stressed-fresh, controlled); (2) recently (<24 h) cut, irradiated and measured with EPR after application of a special treatment (10 min of water soaking, 5 min of drying time) to reduce the mechanical stress caused by cutting the samples, and with rigorous control of size and number of clippings (unstressed-fresh, controlled); (3) previously (>24 h) cut, stored at room temperature, additionally cut into small pieces immediately prior to study, irradiated and measured with EPR without any treatment of samples, and with rigorous control of size and number of clippings (stressed-old, controlled); (4) previously (>24 h) cut, stored at room temperature, additionally cut into small pieces immediately prior to the study, irradiated and measured with EPR after application of a special treatment to reduce mechanical stress caused by cut, and with rigorous control of size and number of clippings (unstressed-old, controlled); and (5) recently (<24 h) cut, irradiated and measured with EPR after application of a special treatment to reduce the mechanical stress caused by cut, and without rigorous control of size and number of clippings (unstressed-fresh, uncontrolled). Except for the fifth selected group, variability of the dose dependence inside all groups was found to be not statistically significant, although the variability among the different groups was significant. Comparison of the mean dose dependences obtained for each group allowed selection of key factors responsible for radiation sensitivity (dose response per unit of mass and dose) and the shape of dose dependence in fingernails. The major factor responsible for radiation sensitivity of fingernails was identified as their water content, which can affect radiation sensitivity up to 35%. The major factor responsible for the shape of the radiation sensitivity was identified as the mechanical stress. At a significant level of mechanical stress, the shape of the dose dependence is linear in the studied dose range (<20 Gy), and in lesser-stressed samples it is of an exponential growth including saturation, which depends on the degree of mechanical stress. In view of the findings, recommendations are discussed and presented for the appropriate protocol for EPR dose measurements in fingernails.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19521713     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-009-0232-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  5 in total

1.  In vivo measurement of water content of the fingernail and its seasonal change.

Authors:  Mariko Egawa; Yukihiro Ozaki; Motoji Takahashi
Journal:  Skin Res Technol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.365

2.  EPR dosimetry in chemically treated fingernails.

Authors:  A Romanyukha; F Trompier; B Leblanc; C Calas; I Clairand; C A Mitchell; James G Smirniotopoulos; H M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.898

3.  Protocol for emergency EPR dosimetry in fingernails.

Authors:  F Trompier; L Kornak; C Calas; A Romanyukha; B Leblanc; C A Mitchell; H M Swartz; I Clairand
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.898

4.  Electron paramagnetic resonance in human fingernails: the sponge model implication.

Authors:  R A Reyes; A Romanyukha; F Trompier; C A Mitchell; I Clairand; T De; L A Benevides; H M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Sulphur radicals formed by cutting alpha-keratin.

Authors:  H Chandra; M C Symons
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Aug 27-Sep 2       Impact factor: 49.962

  5 in total
  7 in total

1.  Advances towards using finger/toenail dosimetry to triage a large population after potential exposure to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Xiaoming He; Jiang Gui; Thomas P Matthews; Benjamin B Williams; Steven G Swarts; Oleg Grinberg; Jason Sidabras; Dean E Wilcox; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.898

2.  Electron paramagnetic resonance radiation dose assessment in fingernails of the victim exposed to high dose as result of an accident.

Authors:  Alexander Romanyukha; François Trompier; Ricardo A Reyes; Doran M Christensen; Carol J Iddins; Stephen L Sugarman
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Comparison of Continuous Wave and Rapid Scan X-band Electron Paramagnetic Resonance of Irradiated Clipped Fingernails.

Authors:  Hanan Elajaili; Joseph McPeak; Alexander Romanyukha; Priyanka Aggarwal; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 0.972

4.  Development and validation of an ex vivo electron paramagnetic resonance fingernail biodosimetric method.

Authors:  Xiaoming He; Steven G Swarts; Eugene Demidenko; Ann B Flood; Oleg Grinberg; Jiang Gui; Michael Mariani; Stephen D Marsh; Andres E Ruuge; Jason W Sidabras; Dmitry Tipikin; Dean E Wilcox; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 0.972

5.  Electron paramagnetic resonance dosimetry for a large-scale radiation incident.

Authors:  Harold M Swartz; Ann Barry Flood; Benjamin B Williams; Ruhong Dong; Steven G Swarts; Xiaoming He; Oleg Grinberg; Jason Sidabras; Eugene Demidenko; Jiang Gui; David J Gladstone; Lesley A Jarvis; Maciej M Kmiec; Kyo Kobayashi; Piotr N Lesniewski; Stephen D P Marsh; Thomas P Matthews; Roberto J Nicolalde; Patrick M Pennington; Timothy Raynolds; Ildar Salikhov; Dean E Wilcox; Bassem I Zaki
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.316

6.  State of the art in nail dosimetry: free radicals identification and reaction mechanisms.

Authors:  F Trompier; A Romanyukha; R Reyes; H Vezin; F Queinnec; D Gourier
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  Effects of water on fingernail electron paramagnetic resonance dosimetry.

Authors:  Tengda Zhang; Zhixin Zhao; Haiying Zhang; Hezheng Zhai; Shuzhou Ruan; Ling Jiao; Wenyi Zhang
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 2.724

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.