In cell and molecular biology, double-stranded circular DNA constructs, known as plasmids, are extensively used to express a gene of interest. These gene expression systems rely on a specific promoter region to drive the transcription of genes either constitutively (i.e., in a continually "ON" state) or conditionally (i.e., in response to a specific transcription initiator). However, controlling plasmid-based expression with high spatial and temporal resolution in cellular environments and in multicellular organisms remains challenging. To overcome this limitation, we have site-specifically installed nucleobase-caging groups within a plasmid promoter region to enable optochemical control of transcription and, thus, gene expression, via photolysis of the caging groups. Through the light-responsive modification of plasmid-based gene expression systems, we have demonstrated optochemical activation of an exogenous fluorescent reporter gene in both tissue culture and a live animal model, as well as light-induced overexpression of an endogenous signaling protein.
In cell and molecular biology, double-stranded circular DNA constructs, known as plasmids, are extensively used to express a gene of interest. These gene expression systems rely on a specific promoter region to drive the transcription of genes either constitutively (i.e., in a continually "ON" state) or conditionally (i.e., in response to a specific transcription initiator). However, controlling plasmid-based expression with high spatial and temporal resolution in cellular environments and in multicellular organisms remains challenging. To overcome this limitation, we have site-specifically installed nucleobase-caging groups within a plasmid promoter region to enable optochemical control of transcription and, thus, gene expression, via photolysis of the caging groups. Through the light-responsive modification of plasmid-based gene expression systems, we have demonstrated optochemical activation of an exogenous fluorescent reporter gene in both tissue culture and a live animal model, as well as light-induced overexpression of an endogenous signaling protein.
Optical control of
biological processes conveys unprecedented spatial
and temporal control over the activation and deactivation of cellular
events, enabling complex investigations that cannot be conducted with
other conditional control elements.[1−10] Examples of cellular processes that have been engineered to respond
to light include ion-channel conductivity,[11,12] RNA polymerization,[13−17] kinase-catalyzed protein phosphorylation,[18−21] and protein translocation.[22−24] For transcriptional activation in eukaryotic systems, a gene expression
plasmid contains a promoter sequence upstream of the gene of interest,
such as the commonly used cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter,[25] which further includes a specific transcription
initiator sequence called the “TATA box”.[26] Transcription is initiated when a subunit of
transcription factor IID (TFIID), referred to as the TATA box binding
protein (TBP), binds to the TATA box sequence and recruits additional
components of the transcriptional machinery such as RNA polymerase
II.[27] Since the binding of TBP to the TATA
box is the driving force to activate transcription, we hypothesized
that this would be an optimal site to optochemically control the transcription
of a plasmid by applying nucleobase “caging” technologies.[28] Caging involves the synthetic installation of
a light-removable protecting group, e.g., an o-nitrobenzyl
group, onto a molecule of interest in a way that renders that molecule
biologically inactive. Exposure of the molecule to light, e.g., nontoxic
UV-A light,[29−31] removes the caging groups, and restores the biological
activity of the molecule. Since light can be controlled with high
spatiotemporal resolution, decaging and biological function can be
precisely regulated as well. The optochemical control of oligonucleotide
function through installation of nucelobase-caging groups[32−38] and photocleavable backbone linkers[39−47] has found widespread biological application. In order to develop
a generally applicable system for the optical activation of transcription
in vivo, we inserted modified short oligomer fragments into plasmids
in a site-specific manner[48] and introduced
caged nucleobases at 1–3 defined sites into the TATA-box promoter
region of large (>4 kB) gene expression plasmids. The newly developed
caged plasmid system was successfully applied to in vivo optochemical
control of gene expression in mammalian cells and in zebrafish.
Results
and Discussion
The optochemical regulation of an enhanced
green fluorescent protein
(EGFP) reporter gene was selected as a proof-of-concept model for
the application of a caged promoter region. An EGFP plasmid was modified
to contain two nicking sites in the CMV promoter flanking the TATA
box, in order to remove a short DNA fragment and replace it with a
caged DNA insert (Figure 1). We hypothesized
that site-specific installation of caged nucleobases within the TATA
box will inhibit initiation of EGFP transcription by TBP. Upon UV
irradiation, the caging groups would be cleaved and transcription
would be activated. To test this hypothesis, 1–3 NPOM-caged
thymidine residues[49] were site-specifically
incorporated into oligonucleotides containing the TATA box sequence
via automated solid-phase DNA synthesis (Supporting
Table 1). A mutant promoter region that contains three T →
C base substitutions (TATATAA → CACACAA) was designed as a
negative control, based on our ability to replace the same thymidine
residues with caged Ts and based on a previous analysis that showed
less than 4% transcriptional efficiency with two or more mutations
in the TATA box region.[50] This Tmut negative control contains thymidine mutations at the same sites
in the TATA box as the designed NPOM-caged promoter constructs. The
installation of the caged thymidine nucleotides was predicted to disrupt
hydrogen-bonding interactions between base-pairs within the TATA box
region; however, nucleotides outside of this region will still be
able to hybridize to their complement sequences as needed for ligation
of the inserts into the plasmid.[48] To ensure
that the caged DNA does not completely inhibit hybridization with
its reverse complement sequence, melting temperatures (Tm) were determined (Supporting Table
2). With each addition of a caged nucleotide, the Tm slightly decreased, which is reflective of the caging
groups interfering with the hydrogen bonding interactions of the nucleobases.[51,52] UV irradiation completely restored binding of the caged TATA box
sequences to their complement sequences. Importantly, hybridization
for all caged primers was still detected at the ligation temperature
of 4 °C, a prerequisite for construction of the promoter-caged
plasmid.
Figure 1
Construction of the site-specifically caged plasmids. (1) pEGFP-Bst
is digested with Nt.BstNB and (2) annealed with the reverse complement
to remove the TATA box region. (3) The digested plasmid is gel purified
and (4) ligated with a phosphorylated caged TATA box insert. (5) The
caged plasmid is then column-purified and (6) applied in mammalian
cells or live animal models that were either kept in the dark (no
expression of EGFP) or irradiated with UV light (EGFP expression).
The restriction sites are underlined and the TATA box recognition
sequence is shown in blue. The NPOM-caged thymidine is represented
by a red circle and the NPOM modification is indicated in red within
the nucleotide structure.
Construction of the site-specifically caged plasmids. (1) pEGFP-Bst
is digested with Nt.BstNB and (2) annealed with the reverse complement
to remove the TATA box region. (3) The digested plasmid is gel purified
and (4) ligated with a phosphorylated caged TATA box insert. (5) The
caged plasmid is then column-purified and (6) applied in mammalian
cells or live animal models that were either kept in the dark (no
expression of EGFP) or irradiated with UV light (EGFP expression).
The restriction sites are underlined and the TATA box recognition
sequence is shown in blue. The NPOM-caged thymidine is represented
by a red circle and the NPOM modification is indicated in red within
the nucleotide structure.The assembled caged plasmids were verified by agarose gel
electrophoresis
(Supporting Figure 1) and were subsequently
assessed for function in mammalian cell culture. A cell viability
assay (CellTiter-Glo, Bio-Rad) was performed to analyze the effects
of cellular UV-A application with increasing intervals of 365 nm irradiations,
demonstrating that UV-A light does not reduce cell viability for exposures
of up to 20 min in our irradiation setup (Supporting
Figure 2). The caged EGFP plasmids were then cotransfected
with a DsRed expression vector as a control, and the transfected HEK293T
cells were either irradiated for 5 min (365 nm, 25 W) or kept in the
dark, followed by incubation for 48 h. EGFP and DsRed expression were
imaged (Supporting Figure 3) and quantified
by flow cytometry (Figure 2A and Supporting Figure 4). As expected, Tmut achieved the greatest reduction in EGFP expression from a series
of mutants analyzed (data not shown), and the thymidine caging groups
were capable of inhibiting EGFP transcription to low basal levels
similar to those of the mutated nonfunctional TATA box sequence. With
each additional caging group a slight reduction in the EGFP background
expression was observed. After UV irradiation, the caged plasmids
regained full functionality, showing expression levels virtually identical
to the noncaged EGFP expression plasmid (T0), which validates
that the incorporation of NPOM-caged thymidine nucleotides within
the TATA box sequence can be applied to the optochemical regulation
of a plasmid expression vector. The high levels of EGFP expression
observed for the T1–T3-caged plasmids
after UV irradiation suggest that optical control for each of the
constructs results in similar levels of gene activation. The T3-caged plasmid was then applied to all subsequent experiments,
since it showed the lowest background EGFP expression before light
exposure. One of the main advantages of using nucleobase caging technology
to photoregulate gene expression is the ability to perform localized
and temporal control over biological activity. To this end, HEK293T
cells were cotransfected with the T3-caged EGFP plasmid
and the control DsRed expression vector. Following transfection, only
a small subset of cells was irradiated with UV light, followed by
imaging after a 48 h incubation. As shown in Figure 2B, EGFP expression was localized to the irradiated area, while
DsRed expression was observed in all cells. This demonstrates that
the developed TATA box-caging methodology can be applied to optochemically
regulate gene expression with spatiotemporal control.
Figure 2
(A) Quantification of
light-activated EGFP expression. HEK293T
cells were transfected with noncaged and caged EGFP plasmids and a
DsRed control plasmid. The cells were irradiated for 5 min (365 nm,
25 W) or kept in the dark. After 48 h incubation, the cells were analyzed
by flow cytometry. The number of cells expressing both EGFP and DsRed
was normalized to the number of cells expressing only DsRed and set
relative to the noncaged plasmid. Standard deviations were calculated
form three individual experiments. ns = not significant (P > 0.05), *** = highly significant (P < 0.001).
(B) Spatial activation of EGFP expression. HEK293T cells were transfected
with T3-caged EGFP and DsRed plasmids. Cells within the
white dashed circle were irradiated through a microscope filter cube
(DAPI, BP377/28, 40×) for 30 s and were imaged (5× magnification)
after 48 h incubation. An enlarged region of the EGFP channel is shown
in the gray box. Scale bar indicates 200 μm.
(A) Quantification of
light-activated EGFP expression. HEK293T
cells were transfected with noncaged and caged EGFP plasmids and a
DsRed control plasmid. The cells were irradiated for 5 min (365 nm,
25 W) or kept in the dark. After 48 h incubation, the cells were analyzed
by flow cytometry. The number of cells expressing both EGFP and DsRed
was normalized to the number of cells expressing only DsRed and set
relative to the noncaged plasmid. Standard deviations were calculated
form three individual experiments. ns = not significant (P > 0.05), *** = highly significant (P < 0.001).
(B) Spatial activation of EGFP expression. HEK293T cells were transfected
with T3-caged EGFP and DsRed plasmids. Cells within the
white dashed circle were irradiated through a microscope filter cube
(DAPI, BP377/28, 40×) for 30 s and were imaged (5× magnification)
after 48 h incubation. An enlarged region of the EGFP channel is shown
in the gray box. Scale bar indicates 200 μm.In order to demonstrate the general applicability
of the developed
methodology, the optochemical overexpression of an endogenous gene
was investigated. Pololike kinase 3 (Plk3) is a serine/threonine kinase
that is essential for cells entering into mitosis, spindle formation,
segregation of the chromosomes, and cytokinesis.[53] Plk3 is also a tumor suppressor that when overexpressed
can induce cell cycle arrest, chromatin condensation, and apoptosis.[54] Since the ectopic expression of Plk3 leads to
disruption of microtubule integrity, a change in cell morphology occurs,
namely cytokinesis defects and formation of binucleated and polynucleated
cells.[55] Due to its involvement in the
cell cycle and the phenotypic change when Plk3 is overexpressed, the
optical activation of Plk3 expression was investigated through the
engineered caged plasmids. To this end, Plk3 was fused to the C-terminus
of the EGFP expression vector based on a previously reported plasmid.[55] The EGFP-Plk3 plasmid was then modified with
the caged TATA box DNA sequences as previous stated (see Figure 1). HeLa cells were transfected with the modified
EGFP-Plk3 plasmids, and the cells were either irradiated for 5 min
(365 nm, 25 W) or kept in the dark, followed by incubation for 48
h. This cell line was used to analyze previously reported phenotypic
changes[55] and to improve single cell imaging
capabilities, since HeLa cells have distinct morphology and form cellular
monolayers, in contrast to the previously used HEK293T cell line.
The cells were fixed and stained to identify actin filaments as well
as nuclei, in addition to EGFP expression. As expected, the positive
control T0-noncaged EGFP-Plk3 plasmid showed transcription
of both genes and a significant change in phenotype, specifically
the formation of binucleated cells and a loss in cellular structure,
while the negative control Tmut showed normal cellular
morphology (Supporting Figure 5). The T3-caged plasmid showed low EGFP expression as well as little
morphological change when the cells were kept in the dark. After UV
irradiation, the caging groups were removed and transcription of EGFP-Plk3
was activated, as shown by the increase in EGFP expression and the
observation of binucleated cells (Figure 3A).
Additionally, the overexpression of Plk3 can lead to apoptosis by
activating caspase-3.[55−57] Thus, the downstream activation of caspase-3 activity
was measured in response to the optochemically driven overexpression
of Plk3. HeLa cells were transfected with the noncaged or caged EGFP-Plk3
plasmids and either kept in the dark or irradiated (365 nm, 5 min)
and caspase-3 activity was measured after 48 h (Ac-DEVD-AFC substrate,
Calbiochem). The T0-noncaged TATA box demonstrated a 5-fold
increase in caspase-3 activity over nontreated cells. In contrast,
the Tmut plasmid only led to basal levels of caspase-3
activity, confirming it as a negative control for Plk3-driven caspase-3
activation (Figure 3B). In the absence of UV
light, the T3-caged plasmid was inactive as only basal
caspase-3 activity similar to nontreated cell was observed, as expected.
However, after light-induced activation an increase in caspase-3 activity
was detected, indicative of Plk3-driven downstream pathway regulation.
These results demonstrate that the overexpression of an endogenous
gene can be optochemically activated through the site-specific incorporation
of NPOM-caged thymidine nucleotides within the TATA box transcription
regulatory region. Here, this was applied to the induction of a phenotypic
change and activation of a downstream signaling pathway; however,
broad applicability of the developed methodology to the temporal activation
of gene function is conceivable.
Figure 3
(A) Light-induced expression of Plk3.
HeLa cells were transfected
with the T3-caged EGFP-Plk3 plasmid followed by irradiation
of the caged construct (365 nm, 5 min, 25 W) and incubated for 48
h. The cells were then fixed and stained with DAPI (nuclei) and rhodamine
phalloidin (actin filaments) prior to imaging (63× magnification).
White arrows indicate binucleated cells, and scale bars indicate 50
μm. (B) Light-induced activation of caspase-3. HeLa cells were
transfected with the Tmut negative control, T0-noncaged, and T3-caged EGFP-Plk3 plasmids. The cells
were either irradiated (365 nm, 5 min, 25 W) or kept in the dark and
lysed after 48 h. The lysate was assayed with a fluorogenic caspase-3
substrate (Calbiochem). Fluorescence units were normalized to the
noncaged control, and standard deviations were calculated from three
individual experiments. ns = not significant (P >
0.05), *** = highly significant (P < 0.001).
(A) Light-induced expression of Plk3.
HeLa cells were transfected
with the T3-caged EGFP-Plk3 plasmid followed by irradiation
of the caged construct (365 nm, 5 min, 25 W) and incubated for 48
h. The cells were then fixed and stained with DAPI (nuclei) and rhodamine
phalloidin (actin filaments) prior to imaging (63× magnification).
White arrows indicate binucleated cells, and scale bars indicate 50
μm. (B) Light-induced activation of caspase-3. HeLa cells were
transfected with the Tmut negative control, T0-noncaged, and T3-caged EGFP-Plk3 plasmids. The cells
were either irradiated (365 nm, 5 min, 25 W) or kept in the dark and
lysed after 48 h. The lysate was assayed with a fluorogenic caspase-3
substrate (Calbiochem). Fluorescence units were normalized to the
noncaged control, and standard deviations were calculated from three
individual experiments. ns = not significant (P >
0.05), *** = highly significant (P < 0.001).In order to demonstrate the applicability
of the caged TATA box
construct to the optochemical control of gene function in an animal,
the expression of a fluorescent reporter was tested in zebrafish embryos.
The zebrafish was selected because it is a common model organism for
developmental studies, its transparency facilitates irradiation, and
plasmid-driven gene expression has been well documented via direct
microinjection into fertilized eggs.[58−60] Microinjections with
modified EGFP plasmids were performed at the 1-cell stage, and embryos
were either irradiated (365 nm, 2 min) or kept in the dark. After
24 h incubation the embryos were dechorionated and imaged for EGFP
expression directly and 24 h later. The T0-noncaged plasmid
was used as a positive control, exhibiting mosaic EGFP expression
patterns commonly observed with DNA injection[60] due to differential plasmid content in each cell (Supporting Figure 6). When the TATA box region of the vector
was caged, transcription was deactivated and only a minimal level
of EGFP expression was observed. However, after UV exposure, the embryos
injected with the T3-caged plasmid showed activation of
EGFP expression, conferring the optical control observed in a single
cell environment to gene expression in a multicellular animal (Figure 4A; see Supporting Figure 7 for additional images). More than 45% of live embryos injected with
the caged plasmid construct expressed EGFP after UV irradiation, with
levels of transcriptional activation similar to the noncaged control
(Figure 4B). Although a small population of
embryos exhibited low levels of EGFP expression in the absence of
UV exposure, a 5-fold increase in EGFP expressing embryos was observed.
Additionally, a UV irradiation time course was performed, indicating
that longer exposures do not significantly enhance the frequency of
EGFP expressing embryos (Supporting Figure 8A). Late-stage irradiations at 8 hpf (75% epiboly stage) were also
performed to examine caged plasmid activation during gastrulation,
and EGFP expression was observed at 24 hpf (Supporting
Figure 8B). Although the total number of EGFP positive embryos
was slightly lower compared to irradiations at earlier stages, the
presence of similar mosaic expression patterns as observed in the
case of 1 hpf irradiation shows that caged plasmids can provide a
means to activate gene expression through UV irradiation later in
development (Supporting Figure 8C). These
results demonstrate that the caged promoter sequence allows for the
construction of plasmid-based optochemical gene expression that can
be readily applied to live aquatic embryos for the regulation of gene
function.
Figure 4
(A) Light-induced EGFP expression in zebrafish. Embryos were microinjected
at the 1-cell stage with the T3-caged EGFP expression plasmid
or the noncaged T0 plasmid. Embryos were then irradiated
(2 min, 365 nm) or kept in the dark and incubated at 28 °C for
24 hpf, followed by dechorionation. Imaging was performed at 48 hpf.
Scale bars indicate 250 μm. (B) Frequency of the EGFP phenotype
for each condition. Error bars represent standard deviations from
three (T0) or four (T3) independent experiments. N = 9–24. ns = not significant (P > 0.05), *** = highly significant (P < 0.001).
(A) Light-induced EGFP expression in zebrafish. Embryos were microinjected
at the 1-cell stage with the T3-caged EGFP expression plasmid
or the noncaged T0 plasmid. Embryos were then irradiated
(2 min, 365 nm) or kept in the dark and incubated at 28 °C for
24 hpf, followed by dechorionation. Imaging was performed at 48 hpf.
Scale bars indicate 250 μm. (B) Frequency of the EGFP phenotype
for each condition. Error bars represent standard deviations from
three (T0) or four (T3) independent experiments. N = 9–24. ns = not significant (P > 0.05), *** = highly significant (P < 0.001).
Summary
In summary, we have engineered
a system in which plasmid function
can be optochemically regulated with high spatial and temporal resolution.
A site-specifically caged promoter region was inserted into expression
plasmids via ligation with synthetic nucleobase-caged DNA strands.
By installing NPOM-caged thymidine nucleotides within the TATA box
promoter region, transcription was inhibited and activity was not
observed until the caging groups were removed through a brief exposure
to UV light. The optical OFF → ON switching of plasmid function
was assessed using a fluorescent reporter gene in live cells, and
spatial control of activation was demonstrated for TATA box-driven
gene expression in human tissue culture. Additionally, we were able
to show that the engineered system could be used to regulate cellular
signaling cascades by optochemically triggering overexpression of
an endogenous gene, polo-like kinase 3 (Plk3). The effect of Plk3
overexpression was observed by a phenotype change leading to binucleation
only in irradiated cells and through upregulation of caspase-3 activity
after light-induced Plk3 activation. Lastly, we were able to apply
the caged vector methodology to the optochemical triggering of gene
expression in live animals. Specifically, light-activated gene expression
was achieved in the zebrafish embryo, a multicellular model organism
that is extensively used for genetic studies. In contrast to caging
of the oligonucleotide phosphate backbone[61−63] our approach
is completely site-specific, generally applicable, and does not require
auxiliary proteins, as only 1–3 NPOM-caging groups are synthetically
incorporated onto nucleobases in the TATA-box region of the expression
plasmids. Thus, only a few photolysis reactions are required to optically
activate gene expression from an otherwise inactive expression vector.
This method adds a new and precise synthetic biology tool to the light-regulation
of gene function in cells and organism and has broad applicability
in the regulation of plasmid-encoded protein expression, as demonstrated
in mammalian cell culture and zebrafish embryos.
Methods
Construction
of the Caged Plasmids
The Nt.BstNB restriction
sites were cloned into the pEGFP-N1 19 bases upstream and immediately
downstream of the TATA box through PCR amplification: Forward Primer:
5′ TATATAAGACCGAGTCCCGTCGTCAGATCCGC.
Reverse Primer: 5′ AGCAGAGCTGGTTTAACGCGACTCGCCCAACCGC. The created plasmid, pEGFP-BstNB (40 μg), was digested
with Nt.BstNB (New England Biolabs, Buffer 3.1) at 55 °C for
2 h (500 μL). The enzyme was heat inactivated at 80 °C
for 20 min. The reverse complement to the 34 bp DNA fragment was added
to the digestion reaction (25 μL of a 100 μM solution)
and then annealed with 80 °C for 5 min and slowly cooled to rt.
The digested plasmid was gel purified (0.8% agarose gel) with the
E.Z.N.A. gel extraction kit (Omega) and eluted in 50 μL of water.
The noncaged and caged TATA box sequences (see Supporting Table 1) were 5′ phosphorylated with T4
polynucleotide kinase (New England Biolabs) at 50 μM (50 μL)
and were ligated (10 μL insert, 60 μL reaction) into the
purified plasmid using Quick ligase (New England Biolabs). The ligated
product was column purified with E.Z.N.A. plasmid purification kit
(Omega) and quantified with a Nanodrop spectrometer.
DNA Synthesis
Protocol
DNA synthesis was performed
using an Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA) Model 394 automated
DNA/RNA Synthesizer using standard β-cyanoethyl phosphoramidite
chemistry. The caged DNA oligonucleotides were synthesized using 40
nmol scale solid-phase supports obtained from Glen Research. Reagents
for automated DNA synthesis were also obtained from Glen Research.
Specialized NPOM-caged thymidine phosphoramidite was synthesized as
previously described and dissolved in anhydrous acetonitrile to a
final concentration of 0.05 M. Standard synthesis cycles provided
by Applied Biosystems were used for all normal bases using 2 min coupling
times. The coupling time was increased to 10 min for the positions
at which the caged thymidine phosphoramidites were incorporated. Each
synthesis cycle was monitored by following the release of dimethoxytrityl
(DMT) cations after each deprotection step. No significant loss of
DMT was noted following the addition of the caged-T to the DNA, thus
10 min was sufficient to allow maximal coupling of the caged thymidine.
Oligonucleotides were eluted from the solid-phase supports with 1
mL ammonium hydroxide methylamine (AMA, 1:1) and deprotected at 65
°C for 2 h. The full-length caged oligonucleotides were purified
with Nap-10 columns (GE Healthcare).
Melting Temperatures
The melting temperature (Tm) of each
TATA box duplex was measured using
a CFX96 Touch Real Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad). TATA box DNA
duplexes (20 μL, 1 μM) were incubated in TAE/Mg2+ buffer (0.04 M tris-acetate, 1 mM EDTA, and 12.5 mM magnesium acetate)
and annealed over a temperature gradient from 95 to 4 °C over
10 min. The samples were then heated in the presence of SYBR green
(1 μL of 20× SsoFast EvaGreen Supermix, Bio-Rad) from 0
to 100 °C, at a rate of 0.5 °C/min, with a dwell time of
10 s and the fluorescence measured every 0.5 °C. The Tm was determined by the maximum of the first
derivative of the fluorescence vs temperature plot. Standard deviations
were calculated from three individual experiments.
Analysis of
Cell Viability with UV-A Exposure
Humanembryonic kidney (HEK) 293T cells were grown at 37 °C, 5% CO2 in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM,
Hyclone), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone) and 10%
streptomycin/penicillin (MP Biomedicals). Cells were passaged into
a 96-well plate (200 μL per well, ∼1 × 104 cells per well) and grown to ∼70% confluence within 24 h.
Cells were then irradiated for 0–20 min (365 nm, 25 W), followed
by incubation for 24 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2. After the
overnight incubation, 150 μL of the cellular media was removed
and 50 μL CellTiter-Glo (Bio-Rad) reagent was added. Chemiluminescence
was measured on a BioTek Synergy 4 plate reader at 10 min. Standard
deviations were calculated from three individual experiments.
Light
Activation of EGFP Expression
HEK293T cells were
passaged into 96-well plates (200 μL per well, ∼1 ×
104 cells per well) and grown to ∼70% confluence
within 24 h. The media was replaced with DMEM without antibiotics,
and the cells were transfected with pEGFP-BstNB (150 ng/well) and
pDsRed-N1 (300 ng/well) plasmids using branched polyethylene imine
(bPEI, 0.5 μL/well) in an overnight experiment. The following
morning, the cells were either irradiated for 5 min (365 nm, 25 W)
or kept in the dark, followed by incubation for 48 h at 37 °C,
5% CO2. The cells were imaged on a Zeiss Observer Z1 microscope
(5× magnification objective, filter sets 43 HE DsRed and 38 HE
EGFP).
Flow Cytometry Analysis
HEK293T cells were passaged
into 24-well plates (1 mL per well, ∼4 × 104 cells per well) and grown to ∼70% confluence within 24 h.
The media was replaced with DMEM without antibiotics, and the cells
were transfected with pEGFP-BstNB (750 ng/well) and pDsRed-N1 (1500
ng/well) plasmids using branched polyethylene imine (bPEI, 0.5 μL/well)
in an overnight experiment. The following morning, the cells were
either irradiated for 5 min (365 nm, 25 W) or kept in the dark, followed
by incubation for 48 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2. The cells
were trypsinized and resuspended in DMEM media. A total of 20000 cells/events
were gated by flow cytometry. Analysis was performed on a FACSCalibur
(Becton-Dickinson) instrument, using a 488 nm excitation laser with
a 530 nm band-pass filter (EGFP) and a 633 nm excitation argon laser
with a 671 nm band-pass filter (DsRed). Fluorescence was analyzed
using the Cellquest Pro Software. For each of the triplicates, the
data were averaged, normalized to the T0-noncaged control,
and standard deviations were calculated. P values
were calculated from unpaired t tests.
Spatial Activation
of Gene Expression
HEK293T cells
were passaged into 96-well plates (200 μL per well, ∼1
× 104 cells per well) and grown to ∼70% confluence
within 24 h. Cells were transfected with the T3-caged EGFP
(50 ng) and pDsRed-N1 (300 ng) plasmids using 1 μL of lipofectamine
transfection reagent (Invitrogen) in 200 μL Opti-Mem media (Invitrogen)
at 37 °C for 4 h. The media was removed and replaced with DMEM
growth media. Localized irradiation was performed with a Zeiss Observer
Z1 microscope (40X objective, NA 0.75 plan-apochromat; Zeiss) and
a DAPI filter (68 HE, ex:BP377/28) to irradiate a specific subset
of cells for 30 s. The cells were then incubated at 37 °C, 5%
CO2 for 48 h and imaged on a Zeiss Observer Z1 microscope
(5× magnification objective, filter sets 43 HE DsRed and 38 HE
EGFP).
Plk3 Phenotypic Cell Assay
The Plk3 gene was fused
to the C terminus of EGFP in pEGFP-Bst to form the pEGFP-Bst-Plk3
plasmid. The pEGFP-Bst-Plk3 plasmid was constructed by amplifying
Plk3 from a DrosophilaPlk3 cDNA (ATCC) with a Forward primer: 5′
CGTAAGCAATTGGACTTCTTTACC and Reverse Primer:
5′ CCTACGACTAGTCTAGGCTGGGCT. The pEGFP-BstNB
plasmid was PCR amplified: Forward primer: 5′ GGAACTAGTCAGCGGCCGCGACTCT.
Reverse primer: 5′ CCTACGCAATTGCTTGTACAGCTCGTC.
Both PCR products were digested with SpeI and MfeI and ligated together
with Quick ligase (New England Biolabs). The constructed plasmid pEGFP-Bst-Plk3
was confirmed by sequencing using the following sequencing primer:
5′ CTGCTGCCCGACAACCAC. The caged pEGFP-Bst-Plk3
plasmid was constructed using the same protocol as described above.
HeLa cells were passaged into 4 well chamber slides and grown to 70%
confluency. The cells were transfected with noncaged and caged pEGFP-Bst-Plk3
plasmids (150 ng) using linear polyethylene imine (LPEI) in an overnight
experiment. The cells were irradiated with a UV transilluminator (365
nm, 5 min, 25 W) and were incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 48 h. The cells were fixed and stained with DAPI (blue) and
rhodamine phalloidin (red) then imaged on a Zeiss Z1 Observer microscope
(63× magnification objective, filter sets 43 HE DsRed and 38
HE eGFP).
Plk3 Caspase 3 Activity Assay
HeLa cells were grown
at 37 °C, 5% CO2 in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s
medium (DMEM, Hyclone), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone)
and 10% streptomycin/penicillin (MP Biomedicals). The cells were passaged
into 24-well plates (1 mL per well, ∼4 × 104 cells per well) and grown to ∼70% confluency within 24 h.
The cells were transfected with noncaged and caged pEGFP-Bst-Plk3
plasmids (150 ng) using LPEI in an overnight experiment. The cells
were irradiated with UV light (365 nm, 5 min, 25 W UV transilluminator)
and were incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 48 h. The
cells were lysed with Mammalian Cell Culture Protein Extraction buffer
(GE Healthcare). Total protein was quantified with a Nanodrop spectrometer.
HeLa cell protein extract (100 μg) was incubated with 50 μM
Caspase-3 substrate (Ac-DEVD-AFC, Calbiochem) in activity buffer (50
mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM MgCl2, 250 μM EDTA,
10% sucrose, 0.1% CHAPS, pH 7.2) at 37 °C for 20 h. The fluorescence
was measured on a BioTek Synergy 4 plate reader (400/505 nm). For
each of the triplicates, the data were averaged, normalized to the
T0-noncaged control, and standard deviations were calculated. P values were calculated from unpaired t tests.
Zebrafish Maintenance and Injections
All zebrafish
experiments were performed with the University of Pittsburgh Institutional
Animal Care and Use Committee approval. The Oregon AB* strain was
maintained under standard conditions at the University of Pittsburgh
School of Medicine in accordance with Institutional and Federal guidelines.
Embryos from natural matings were obtained and microinjected with
50 pg of the plasmid constructs using a World Precision Instruments
Pneumatic PicoPump injector (100 ng/μL diluted 1:1 in phenol
red; 1 nL injection = 50 pg plasmid). Increased plasmid injections
were performed with the same dilution (50 ng/μL) but with increased
injection amount; for example, the 200 pg injections were performed
using 4 nL. Embryos were then irradiated following injection (typically
at the 4- or 8-cell stage) for 2 min with a 365 nm UV transilluminator
and incubated in the dark at 28 °C for 24 h. Late-stage irradiation
experiments were performed at 8 h post fertilization and injection.
Manual dechorionation was performed with forceps and zebrafish were
treated with 1× Tricaine (MS-222, Sigma). Imaging was performed
on a Leica MZ16FA stereo fluorescence microscope with a 1× objective
(N.A. 0.14) at 60× (dechorionated 24 h) and 35× (dechorionated
48 h) zooms. Fluorescent (EGFP) and brightfield (BF) images were collected
with a QImaging Retiga-EXi Fast 1394 digital camera. EGFP scores were
calculated with embryo counts of [(EGFP positive/alive)·100].
For each of the replicates, the data were averaged, and standard deviations
were calculated. P values were calculated from unpaired t tests.
Authors: Clara Brieke; Falk Rohrbach; Alexander Gottschalk; Günter Mayer; Alexander Heckel Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2012-07-24 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Andrei V Karginov; Yan Zou; David Shirvanyants; Pradeep Kota; Nikolay V Dokholyan; Douglas D Young; Klaus M Hahn; Alexander Deiters Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2010-12-16 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Matthew J Kennedy; Robert M Hughes; Leslie A Peteya; Joel W Schwartz; Michael D Ehlers; Chandra L Tucker Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2010-10-31 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Yi I Wu; Daniel Frey; Oana I Lungu; Angelika Jaehrig; Ilme Schlichting; Brian Kuhlman; Klaus M Hahn Journal: Nature Date: 2009-08-19 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Wenyuan Zhou; Wes Brown; Anirban Bardhan; Michael Delaney; Amber S Ilk; Randy R Rauen; Shoeb I Kahn; Michael Tsang; Alexander Deiters Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2020-04-06 Impact factor: 15.336