Chun-Hua Xu1, Li-Ke Yu1, Ke-Ke Hao1. 1. First Department of Respiratory Medicine and Nanjing Chest Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China; Clinical Center of Nanjing Respiratory Diseases, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Abstract
This study was to explore the association between the serum YKL-40 level and the clinical characteristics, the response to chemotherapy and prognosis in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Serum YKL-40 levels were detected and compared in 120 patients with SCLC pre- and post-chemotherapy, and in 40 healthy controls. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were adopted for diagnosis and calculation of area under ROC curve in SCLC. The Kaplan-Meier method, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to analyze the correlation between pre-chemotherapy serum YKL-40 levels and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The pre-chemotherapy serum YKL-40 levels were significantly higher than those of the controls (p<0.001). The post-chemotherapy serum YKL-40 levels in the SCLC cases were lower than pre-chemotherapy serum YKL-40 levels in these cases (p = 0.026). The patients with high serum YKL-40 showed a poorer response to chemotherapy than those patients with low serumYKL-40 (p = 0.031). Univariate analysis revealed that SCLC patients with high serum YKL-40 had a shorter PFS and OS than those with low serum YKL-40 (HR of 1.74, p = 0.033; HR of 1.33, p = 0.001). Cox multivariate analysis indicated that YKL-40 was an independent prognostic indicator of PFS and OS (HR of 1.12, p = 0.029; HR of 1.84, p = 0.025). Kaplan-Meier survival curves further confirmed that patients with low serum YKL-40 have longer PFS and OS (p = 0.016 and p = 0.041, respectively). These results suggest that YKL-40 is a potential prognostic marker of chemotherapy response in SCLC.
This study was to explore the association between the serum YKL-40 level and the clinical characteristics, the response to chemotherapy and prognosis in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Serum YKL-40 levels were detected and compared in 120 patients with SCLC pre- and post-chemotherapy, and in 40 healthy controls. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were adopted for diagnosis and calculation of area under ROC curve in SCLC. The Kaplan-Meier method, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to analyze the correlation between pre-chemotherapy serum YKL-40 levels and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The pre-chemotherapy serum YKL-40 levels were significantly higher than those of the controls (p<0.001). The post-chemotherapy serum YKL-40 levels in the SCLC cases were lower than pre-chemotherapy serum YKL-40 levels in these cases (p = 0.026). The patients with high serum YKL-40 showed a poorer response to chemotherapy than those patients with low serumYKL-40 (p = 0.031). Univariate analysis revealed that SCLCpatients with high serum YKL-40 had a shorter PFS and OS than those with low serum YKL-40 (HR of 1.74, p = 0.033; HR of 1.33, p = 0.001). Cox multivariate analysis indicated that YKL-40 was an independent prognostic indicator of PFS and OS (HR of 1.12, p = 0.029; HR of 1.84, p = 0.025). Kaplan-Meier survival curves further confirmed that patients with low serum YKL-40 have longer PFS and OS (p = 0.016 and p = 0.041, respectively). These results suggest that YKL-40 is a potential prognostic marker of chemotherapy response in SCLC.
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, with more than 1.2 million deaths each year [1]. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for up to 15% of total lung malignancies [2]. Despite the often dramatic response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with SCLC, most die from recurrent disease [3]. With rapid tumor doubling rate and early metastasis, over half of SCLCpatients present with extensive disease [4]. As a result, five years survival rate in SCLC is only 10%–26% [5].Tumor markers play a key role in patient management for many malignancies. The potential uses of serum tumor markers include aiding early diagnosis, determining prognosis, predicting response or resistance to specific therapies, and monitoring therapy in patients with advanced disease. Tumor markers that are currently available for lung cancer, such as progastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and neuron-specific enolase (NSE), are not satisfactory for diagnosis at an early stage or for monitoring the disease because of their relatively low sensitivity and specificity in detecting the presence of cancer cells [6]–[8]. Therefore, more studies are required to discover novel biomarkers in order to predict the chemotherapy response and improve the prognosis of patients with SCLC.YKL-40 is produced by cancer cells and may play a role in cancer cell proliferation and angiogenesis [9]. Recent studies have shown that elevations of serum YKL-40 were reported in various malignant tissues, including breast cancer, gastric cancer, and ovarian cancer [10]–[13]. The association between increased YKL-40 and a poor prognosis has been well documented [11]–[17], including lung cancer [18]–[20]. However, the association between serum YKL-40 level and the clinical characteristics, especially the response to chemotherapy and prognosis in SCLC remain largely unknown.The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical role of serum YKL-40 in SCLCpatients. Our aim is to evaluate the possibility of serum YKL-40 as a biomarker in SCLC.
Materials and Methods
Patients
The study included 120 SCLCpatients, who were diagnosed at the Nanjing Chest Hospital between January 2007 and December 2011. Mean age of the patients was 64.5±5.6 years, 95 male and 25 female. All the patients underwent clinical examination, CT scans of the chest and brain, CT and ultrasonography of the upper abdomen, fibreoptic bronchoscopy, bone scanning, and positron emission tomography. Staging was carried out according to the veterans administration lung cancer group (VALG) staging system [21]: Limited disease (LD) was defined as disease confined to one hemithorax including the mediastinal lymph nodes and/or the supraclavicular lymph nodes; extensive disease (ED) was defined as having limited disease or malignant pleural effusion. Smoking history was obtained from the health interview questionnaire. Current and former smokers were classified as “smoker” and never smokers as “nonsmoker”. The control subjects consisted of 40 healthy volunteers (31 males and 9 females with a mean age of 57.6±10.8 years), as documented by a general health examination in the same period. They were not on any medication, and had no clinical signs or symptoms of cancer, liver, kidney or hormonal disease. The demographic features and clinical characteristics of the studied groups are illustrated in Table 1.
Table 1
Clinical characteristics of SCLC patients and controls.
Characteristics
SCLC (N = 120)
Control (N = 40)
p-value
Age, yr
Range
46 78
45 74
Mean
64.5±5.6
57.6±10.8
0.247
Gender
Male
95 (79.17%)
31 (75.50%)
Female
25 (20.83%)
9 (22.50%)
0.176
Smoking condition
Smoker
80 (66.67%)
29 (72.50%)
Nonsmoker
40 (33.33%)
11 (27.50%)
0.138
p values were calculated using chi-square test.
p values were calculated using chi-square test.All SCLCpatients received chemotherapies for a maximum of six cycles. Chemotherapy regimens are presented in Table 2. Computed tomography (CT) scans were performed after 2 cycles of chemotherapy. All patients had measurable disease. Response categories were defined according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) [22]. For data analysis, CR and PR were combined as response that was sensitive to chemotherapy, while SD and PD were grouped as non-response. Follow-up information was obtained by phone investigations. The median follow-up of surviving patients at the time of analysis was 14 months (range, 5–36 months). The date of the last follow-up was March 21, 2013. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time interval between the date of diagnosis and the date of disease progression or last follow-up. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time interval between the date of diagnosis and the date of death or the last follow-up.
Table 2
The clinicopathological characteristics of SCLC and the association with serum YKL-40 levels.
Group
n
YKL-40 (ng/mL)
p-value
Age, yr
<60
52
68.47±26.95
0.209
≥60
68
74.81±27.76
Gender
Male
95
72.85±26.94
0.541
Female
25
69.06±29.81
Smoking status
Nonsmoker
40
66.51±27.26
0.118
Smoker
80
74.84±27.33
Performance status
0, 1
86
73.92±26.52
0.265
2, 3
34
67.36±29.65
Disease stage
Limited
70
67.31±25.98
0.024*
Extended
50
78.71±28.39
Chemotherapy regimen
EP
102
70.67±25.62
0.376
IP
18
73.16±27.38
EP, cisplatin with etoposide; IP, cisplatin with irinotecan.
*Significant difference.
EP, cisplatin with etoposide; IP, cisplatin with irinotecan.*Significant difference.The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Nanjing Chest Hospital, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients and healthy controls before the study. Doctors recorded the obtainment of the written consent in patients' clinical files. After the treat agreement was signed but prior to the chemotherapy, the patients also noted in the treat agreement that she/he was informed about and agreed to participate in this study. The Ethics Committee approved this written consent procedure and had unscheduled inspection of documents and records to assure the study was compliant.
Serum Collection
Peripheral blood samples were obtained from the healthy controls and from the patients after diagnosis but prior to any treatments. For the 120 SCLCpatients treated with chemotherapy, serum samples were obtained 3 weeks after completion of the second chemotherapy cycle. The whole blood samples were promptly centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 minutes and the supernatant stored at −80°C until use.
Detection of Serum YKL-40 Levels
The serum levels of YKL-40 were measured using an YKL-40 ELISA kit ((Quidel, San Diego, CA, USA). A volume of 50 µl of 2-fold diluted samples was added to a 96-well plate covered with YKL-40 monoclonal antibody and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. After aspirating and washing each well four times, 50 µl of YKL-40 conjugate was added and the wells incubated for 2 h at room temperature. Each well was washed an additional four times to remove residual liquid and 200 µl of substrate solution was added to each well and the wells incubated for 30 min in darkness. After addition of stop solution, absorbance was measured at 450 nm on a Biotek-elx800 microplate reader (Roche, USA), and the YKL-40 concentration determined. The sensitivity of the ELISA was 20 ng/mL. All samples were measured in duplicate in two separate plates. For duplicate samples, intra-assay coefficient of variation of <5% and the inter-assay coefficient of variation of <6% were accepted.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS 17.0 software. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Continuous variables were compared using t test. Survival curves were plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Survival data were evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristics curves (ROC) were adopted to determine the diagnostic value of YKL-40 in cancer. For each ROC, an optimal cut-off point was determined as the value of the parameter that maximized the sum of specificity and sensitivity. A value of p<0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Pre-chemotherapy Serum YKL-40 Levels in the SCLC Patients and the Controls
As shown in Figure 1, the mean level of YKL-40 in the pre-chemotherapy serum from SCLCpatients (n = 120) was (72.06±27.48 ng/mL), which was significantly higher than the controls (n = 40, 48.41±13.63 ng/mL, p<0.001).
Figure 1
Pre-chemotherapy serum YKL-40 levels in SCLC patients and healthy controls.
Among 120 SCLC patients, the serum levels of YKL-40 were (72.06±27.48) ng/mL, which were significantly higher than (48.41±13.63) ng/mL in healthy controls (p<0.001, t-test).
Pre-chemotherapy serum YKL-40 levels in SCLC patients and healthy controls.
Among 120 SCLCpatients, the serum levels of YKL-40 were (72.06±27.48) ng/mL, which were significantly higher than (48.41±13.63) ng/mL in healthy controls (p<0.001, t-test).
Relationship between Pre-Chemotherapy Serum YKL-40 Levels and Clinicopathological Characteristics
Table 2 showed the pre-chemotherapy serum YKL-40 levels in SCLC with different clinicopathological characteristics. The serum YKL-40 levels were significantly correlated with disease stage (p = 0.024), while there were no difference with age (p = 0.209), gender (p = 0.541), smoking status (p = 0.118), performance status (p = 0.265), and chemotherapy regimen (p = 0.376).
Diagnostic Value of Serum YKL-40 in SCLC
ROC curves were calculated based on the serum YKL-40 levels of the 120 SCLCpatients and 40 controls (Figure 2). The estimated area under the ROC curve was 0.96 (95% CI (confidence interval), 0.93–0.99). The optimal cut-off value of serum YKL-40 level was 65.7 ng/mL (low vs. high) based on the maximization of the sum of specificity and sensitivity, resulting in 67.5% sensitivity, 95.0% specificity, and 74.4% accuracy for the diagnosis of SCLC.
Figure 2
ROC curve of the serum YKL-40 levels of 120 SCLC patients and 40 controls.
Serum levels of YKL-40 among 120 SCLC patients and 40 healthy controls were determined. The diagnostic potentials of YKL-40 were assessed by ROC curves. The AUC value was 0.96.
ROC curve of the serum YKL-40 levels of 120 SCLC patients and 40 controls.
Serum levels of YKL-40 among 120 SCLCpatients and 40 healthy controls were determined. The diagnostic potentials of YKL-40 were assessed by ROC curves. The AUC value was 0.96.
Serum YKL-40 and Response to Chemotherapy
To determine the correlation between serum YKL-40 levels and chemotherapy response, the YKL-40 levels between pre- and post-chemotherapy were analyzed in SCLCpatients who received 2 cycles of chemotherapy. Generally, serum YL-40 levels significantly decreased after chemotherapy (p = 0.026) (Figure 3A). Among 120 patients, 32 (26.67%) patients achieved CR, 33 (27.5%) patients achieved PR, 35 (29.17%) patients achieved SD, and 20 (16.67%) patients achieved PD. Of the 81 patients with high serum YKL-40, 38 (46.91%) responded to chemotherapy with either complete response, or partial remission. Of 39 low serumYKL-40 patients, 27 (69.23%) exhibited a response to chemotherapy. The difference in response to chemotherapy between high and low serum YKL-40patients was statistically significant (p = 0.031) (Table 3).
Figure 3
Distribution of serum YKL-40 levels.
Serum YL-40 levels in the SCLC patients significantly decreased after chemotherapy (p = 0.026) (A). The pre-chemotherapy serum YKL-40 levels were lower in the sensitive to chemotherapy group than in the resistant to chemotherapy group (p = 0.004) (B). Serum YKL-40 of responders after chemotherapy were significantly decreased (p = 0.029), while YKL-40 of non-responders did not change significantly (p = 0.256) (C).
Serum YL-40 levels in the SCLCpatients significantly decreased after chemotherapy (p = 0.026) (A). The pre-chemotherapy serum YKL-40 levels were lower in the sensitive to chemotherapy group than in the resistant to chemotherapy group (p = 0.004) (B). Serum YKL-40 of responders after chemotherapy were significantly decreased (p = 0.029), while YKL-40 of non-responders did not change significantly (p = 0.256) (C).CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease.*Significant difference.Pre-chemotherapy serum YKL-40 of patients who were sensitive to chemotherapy were significantly lower than that of non-responders (p = 0.004) (Figure 3B). Serum YKL-40 of responders after chemotherapy were significantly decreased (p = 0.029), while YKL-40 of non-responders did not change significantly (p = 0.256) (Figure 3C) (Table 4).
Table 4
Characteristics and serum YKL-40 distribution of SCLC patients with pre-and post- chemotherapy.
Low serum YKL-40patients had significantly longer PFS and OS than high serum YKL-40patients (Figure 4 and 5). The median PFS and OS were 6 and 10 months for high serum YKL-40patients compared with 9 and 18 months for low serum YKL-40patients, respectively. The 1-year survival rate was 40.7% in the 81 cases with high serumYKL-40, and 51.3% in the 39 cases with low serum YKL-40, a statistically significant difference (p = 0.041).
Figure 4
Kaplan-Meier curve comparing PFS of SCLC patients with high serum YKL-40 versus those with low serum YKL-40.
Log-rank test determined that the PFS in low serum YKL-40 group was significantly longer than those of the high serum YKL-40 group (p = 0.016).
Figure 5
Kaplan-Meier curve comparing OS of SCLC patients with high serum YKL-40 versus those with low serum YKL-40.
The Log-rank test showed that the survival times were significantly longer in patients with low serum YKL-40 than those of high serum YKL-40 (p = 0.041).
Kaplan-Meier curve comparing PFS of SCLC patients with high serum YKL-40 versus those with low serum YKL-40.
Log-rank test determined that the PFS in low serum YKL-40 group was significantly longer than those of the high serum YKL-40 group (p = 0.016).
Kaplan-Meier curve comparing OS of SCLC patients with high serum YKL-40 versus those with low serum YKL-40.
The Log-rank test showed that the survival times were significantly longer in patients with low serum YKL-40 than those of high serum YKL-40 (p = 0.041).In univariate Cox analysis, the pre-chemotherapy serum YKL-40 level (dichotomized as >65.7 ng/mL vs ≤65.7 ng/mL) was associated with PFS (HR = 1.74, p = 0.033) and OS (HR = 1.33, p = 0.001) (Table 5 and Table 6). Univariate analysis of prognostic significance also showed that disease stage was significantly associated with poor survival. However, no association with the patient's prognosis was noted for age, gender, smoking, performance status and chemotherapy regimen.
Table 5
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis of variables with PFS.
Variables
Univariate
Multivariate
HR (95% CI)
p-value
HR (95% CI)
p-value
Age (<60 vs. ≥60)
1.21 (0.72–2.02)
0.475
Gender (female vs. male)
0.48 (0.22–1.04)
0.064
Disease stage (limited vs. extended)
3.21 (1.15–8.93)
0.025*
2.34 (1.02–5.36)
0.046*
Smoking status (smoker vs. nonsmoker)
0.99 (0.96–1.02)
0.474
Performance status (0, 1 vs. 2, 3)
1.70 (0.93–3.11)
0.082
Chemotherapy regimen (EP vs. IP)
1.92 (0.69–1.983)
0.673
YKL-40 (high vs. low)
1.74 (1.05-2.88)
0.033*
1.12 (1.01–1.23)
0.029*
HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; EP, cisplatin with etoposide; IP, cisplatin with irinotecan.
*Significant difference.
Table 6
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis of variables with OS.
Variables
Univariate
Multivariate
HR (95% CI)
p-value
HR (95% CI)
p-value
Age (<60 vs. ≥60)
0.98 (0.43–2.23)
0.957
Gender(female vs. male)
0.72 (0.51–1.02)
0.065
Disease stage (Limited vs. Extended)
3.16 (1.36–7.40)
0.007*
2.13 (1.32–3.44)
0.002*
Smoking status (smoker vs. nonsmoker)
0.99 (0.97–1.01)
0.141
Performance status (0, 1 vs. 2, 3)
1.09 (0.97–1.22)
0.089
Chemotherapy regimen (EP vs. IP)
1.37 (0.65–2.86)
0.408
YKL-40 (high vs. low)
1.33 (0.65–2.21)
0.001*
1.84 (1.08–3.15)
0.025*
HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; EP, cisplatin with etoposide; IP, cisplatin with irinotecan.
*Significant difference.
HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; EP, cisplatin with etoposide; IP, cisplatin with irinotecan.*Significant difference.HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; EP, cisplatin with etoposide; IP, cisplatin with irinotecan.*Significant difference.In multivariate Cox analysis, the pre-chemotherapy serum level of YKL-40 was independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS in the patients with SCLC (Table 5 and Table 6).
Discussion
YKL-40 is a chitinase-like protein. The biologic functions of YKL-40 in cancer cells are unknown, and very few studies have evaluated the functional role of YKL-40 expression in cancer cells. It has been suggested that YKL-40 plays a role in the proliferation and differentiation of malignant cells, protects the cells from undergoing apoptosis, stimulates angiogenesis, has an effect on extracellular tissue remodeling, and stimulates fibroblast activity or proliferation surrounding the cancer cells [23], [24].The objective of the current investigation was to study the association between the pre-chemotherapy serum YKL-40 level and chemotherapy response and clinical outcomes of patients with SCLC. In the present study, serum YKL-40 levels were higher in SCLCpatients in line with the levels reported in most other types of cancer [25]–[27]. Furthermore, with a cut-off value of 65.7 ng/mL, YKL-40 had a sensitivity of 67.5% and a specificity of 95.0% for the prediction of SCLC, making it a potential adjunctive tool for diagnosis of SCLC. Importantly, the serum levels of YKL-40 were significantly correlated with disease stage, while there were no difference with age, gender, smoking status and performance status.Reports regarding the association of YKL-40 expression with response to chemotherapy are few and varied. Gronlund et al reported that high serum levels of YKL-40 were associated with increased risk of second-line chemoresistance in patients with ovarian cancer [28]. However, Thöm et al found that the pretreatment serum YKL-40 level had no impact on response to chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [20]. Our study clearly showed that high serum YKL-40patients response to chemotherapy were poorer than those of low serum YKL-40patients. These results probably reflect different mechanisms of carcinogenesis between SCLC and NSCLC. Additionally, we observed that the pre-chemotherapy serum YKL-40 levels of the responder groups which were sensitive to chemotherapy were significantly lower than those of the non-responder groups which were resistant to chemotherapy. Moreover, serum YKL-40 levels were significantly decreased after chemotherapy, especially in the positive response group. To date, the mechanism of YKL-40 involved in resistance to chemotherapy is currently unclear.Many studies have shown that serum YKL-40 was an important factor to predict the prognosis of several types of cancer [11]–[17]. Recently, Choi et al reported that high pretreatment serum YKL-40 level in patients with NSCLC was an independent prognostic variable of poor prognosis [18]. In SCLCpatients, a high serum YKL-40 at the time of diagnosis and before chemotherapy was independent of prognostic variables for survival within the first 6 months and independent of age, performance status, and serum lactate dehydrogenase [19]. In our study, we have demonstrated that serum YKL-40 level in patients with SCLC was related to their very poor prognosis, as illustrated by the short PFS and OS in SCLCpatients that had the highest serum YKL-40 levels. It is noteworthy that a high serum YKL-40 level was an independent prognostic biomarker of poor survival in this patient population. The mechanism involved in the association between YKL-40 and a poor prognosis is poorly understood. Previous studies suggested that poor survival in cancerpatients with elevated YKL-40 might be attributed to the promotion of angiogenesis [17], [29].In conclusion, the serum level of YKL-40 in SCLCpatients was significantly higher than healthy controls. Serum YKL-40 in the positive chemotherapeutic response group was significantly lower after chemotherapy. The results not only further support that serum YKL-40 is related to chemotherapy response, but also provide clues that YKL-40 possess the potential to be a serum diagnostic and prognostic marker for SCLC. Moreover, further work is underway to both replicate these findings in a study with a larger cohort in lung cancer.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Henrik Schmidt; Julia S Johansen; Pia Sjoegren; Ib J Christensen; Boe S Sorensen; Kirsten Fode; Jorn Larsen; Hans von der Maase Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-01-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ahlame Saidi; Sophie Javerzat; Akeila Bellahcène; John De Vos; Lorenzo Bello; Vincent Castronovo; Manuel Deprez; Hugues Loiseau; Andreas Bikfalvi; Martin Hagedorn Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2008-05-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: A Mitsuhashi; H Matsui; H Usui; Y Nagai; S Tate; Y Unno; K Hirashiki; K Seki; M Shozu Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2008-08-22 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Nicolai A Schultz; Ib J Christensen; Jens Werner; Nathalia Giese; Benny V Jensen; Ole Larsen; Jon K Bjerregaard; Per Pfeiffer; Dan Calatayud; Svend E Nielsen; Mette K Yilmaz; Niels H Holländer; Morten Wøjdemann; Stig E Bojesen; Kaspar R Nielsen; Julia S Johansen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-06-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Yong Sun Lee; Ji Eun Yu; Ki Cheon Kim; Dong Hun Lee; Dong Ju Son; Hee Pom Lee; Jae-Kyung Jung; Nam Du Kim; Young Wan Ham; Jaesuk Yun; Sang-Bae Han; Jin Tae Hong Journal: Mol Oncol Date: 2021-11-24 Impact factor: 6.603
Authors: Ines Mack; Andreas Hector; Marlene Ballbach; Julius Kohlhäufl; Katharina J Fuchs; Alexander Weber; Marcus A Mall; Dominik Hartl Journal: Mol Cell Pediatr Date: 2015-02-27