OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of chitinase 3-like 1 (CHI3L1) alone or in combination with other biomarkers in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Serum samples were collected from 70 patients with pancreatic cancer and 31 healthy subjects and the levels of CHI3L1, CA199, C3, C4, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) in serum were detected. RESULTS: The serum samples from pancreatic cancer patients showed significantly higher CHI3L1, CA199, C3, C4, HDL-C, and LDL-C levels than those from healthy subjects (P<0.05). In patients with pancreatic cancer, serum CHI3L1 level was significantly correlated with the administration of anti-cancer therapy (P<0.05), but not with gender, age, metastasis or other clinicopathological parameters (P<0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that serum CHI3L1, CA199, C3, C4, HDL-C, and LDL-C all had diagnostic value for pancreatic cancer. Multivariate analysis suggested that the combined detection model of CHI3L1, CA199, C3, and HDL-C (AUC=0.964) had a greater diagnostic value than CA199 (AUC=0.896) alone and the combined detection model consisting of CA199, C3, and HDL-C (AUC=0.923; P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Serum levels of CHI3L1, CA199, C3, C4, HDL-C, and LDL-C all have diagnostic value for pancreatic cancer, and the combined model consisting of CHI3L1, CA199, C3, and HDL-C have greater diagnostic efficacy than the other biomarkers either alone or in combination.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of chitinase 3-like 1 (CHI3L1) alone or in combination with other biomarkers in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Serum samples were collected from 70 patients with pancreatic cancer and 31 healthy subjects and the levels of CHI3L1, CA199, C3, C4, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) in serum were detected. RESULTS: The serum samples from pancreatic cancerpatients showed significantly higher CHI3L1, CA199, C3, C4, HDL-C, and LDL-C levels than those from healthy subjects (P<0.05). In patients with pancreatic cancer, serum CHI3L1 level was significantly correlated with the administration of anti-cancer therapy (P<0.05), but not with gender, age, metastasis or other clinicopathological parameters (P<0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that serum CHI3L1, CA199, C3, C4, HDL-C, and LDL-C all had diagnostic value for pancreatic cancer. Multivariate analysis suggested that the combined detection model of CHI3L1, CA199, C3, and HDL-C (AUC=0.964) had a greater diagnostic value than CA199 (AUC=0.896) alone and the combined detection model consisting of CA199, C3, and HDL-C (AUC=0.923; P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Serum levels of CHI3L1, CA199, C3, C4, HDL-C, and LDL-C all have diagnostic value for pancreatic cancer, and the combined model consisting of CHI3L1, CA199, C3, and HDL-C have greater diagnostic efficacy than the other biomarkers either alone or in combination.
Authors: Julia S Johansen; Ib J Christensen; Lars N Jørgensen; Jesper Olsen; Hans B Rahr; Knud T Nielsen; Søren Laurberg; Nils Brünner; Hans Jørgen Nielsen Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2015-01-18 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Ralph A Francescone; Steve Scully; Michael Faibish; Sherry L Taylor; Dennis Oh; Luis Moral; Wei Yan; Brooke Bentley; Rong Shao Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2011-03-08 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Andrew V Biankin; Nicola Waddell; Karin S Kassahn; Marie-Claude Gingras; Lakshmi B Muthuswamy; Amber L Johns; David K Miller; Peter J Wilson; Ann-Marie Patch; Jianmin Wu; David K Chang; Mark J Cowley; Brooke B Gardiner; Sarah Song; Ivon Harliwong; Senel Idrisoglu; Craig Nourse; Ehsan Nourbakhsh; Suzanne Manning; Shivangi Wani; Milena Gongora; Marina Pajic; Christopher J Scarlett; Anthony J Gill; Andreia V Pinho; Ilse Rooman; Matthew Anderson; Oliver Holmes; Conrad Leonard; Darrin Taylor; Scott Wood; Qinying Xu; Katia Nones; J Lynn Fink; Angelika Christ; Tim Bruxner; Nicole Cloonan; Gabriel Kolle; Felicity Newell; Mark Pinese; R Scott Mead; Jeremy L Humphris; Warren Kaplan; Marc D Jones; Emily K Colvin; Adnan M Nagrial; Emily S Humphrey; Angela Chou; Venessa T Chin; Lorraine A Chantrill; Amanda Mawson; Jaswinder S Samra; James G Kench; Jessica A Lovell; Roger J Daly; Neil D Merrett; Christopher Toon; Krishna Epari; Nam Q Nguyen; Andrew Barbour; Nikolajs Zeps; Nipun Kakkar; Fengmei Zhao; Yuan Qing Wu; Min Wang; Donna M Muzny; William E Fisher; F Charles Brunicardi; Sally E Hodges; Jeffrey G Reid; Jennifer Drummond; Kyle Chang; Yi Han; Lora R Lewis; Huyen Dinh; Christian J Buhay; Timothy Beck; Lee Timms; Michelle Sam; Kimberly Begley; Andrew Brown; Deepa Pai; Ami Panchal; Nicholas Buchner; Richard De Borja; Robert E Denroche; Christina K Yung; Stefano Serra; Nicole Onetto; Debabrata Mukhopadhyay; Ming-Sound Tsao; Patricia A Shaw; Gloria M Petersen; Steven Gallinger; Ralph H Hruban; Anirban Maitra; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue; Richard D Schulick; Christopher L Wolfgang; Richard A Morgan; Rita T Lawlor; Paola Capelli; Vincenzo Corbo; Maria Scardoni; Giampaolo Tortora; Margaret A Tempero; Karen M Mann; Nancy A Jenkins; Pedro A Perez-Mancera; David J Adams; David A Largaespada; Lodewyk F A Wessels; Alistair G Rust; Lincoln D Stein; David A Tuveson; Neal G Copeland; Elizabeth A Musgrove; Aldo Scarpa; James R Eshleman; Thomas J Hudson; Robert L Sutherland; David A Wheeler; John V Pearson; John D McPherson; Richard A Gibbs; Sean M Grimmond Journal: Nature Date: 2012-10-24 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Julia Mayerle; Holger Kalthoff; Regina Reszka; Beate Kamlage; Erik Peter; Bodo Schniewind; Sandra González Maldonado; Christian Pilarsky; Claus-Dieter Heidecke; Philipp Schatz; Marius Distler; Jonas A Scheiber; Ujjwal M Mahajan; F Ulrich Weiss; Robert Grützmann; Markus M Lerch Journal: Gut Date: 2017-01-20 Impact factor: 23.059