| Literature DB >> 24799905 |
Yahya Nural1, H Ali Döndaş2, Hayati Sarı3, Hasan Atabey3, Samet Belveren1, Müge Gemili1.
Abstract
The acid dissociation constants of potential bioactive fused ring thiohydantoin-pyrrolidine compounds were determined by potentiometric titration in 20% (v/v) ethanol-water mixed at 25 ± 0.1°C, at an ionic background of 0.1 mol/L of NaCl using the HYPERQUAD computer program. Proton affinities of potential donor atoms of the ligands were calculated by AM1 and PM3 semiempiric methods. We found, potentiometrically, three different acid dissociation constants for 1a-f. We suggest that these acid dissociation constants are related to the carboxyl, enol, and amino groups.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24799905 PMCID: PMC3985308 DOI: 10.1155/2014/634194
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Anal Chem ISSN: 1687-8760 Impact factor: 1.885
Figure 1Methyl ester of thiohydantoin-pyrrolidine compounds (1a–g) and their hydrolysis products in acidic media (2a–g).
Figure 2Potentiometric titration curves (a) and distribution curves of ligands ((b) 2a (c) 2b (d) 2c (e) 2d (f) 2e (g) 2f (h) 2g) (20% (v/v) ethanol-water mixed, 25.0 ± 0.1°C, I = 0.1 mol/L by NaCl).
Acid dissociation constants (pK) of ligands (20% (v/v) ethanol-water mixed, 25.0 ± 0.1°C, I = 0.1 mol/L by NaCl) (log10β is cumulative acid dissociation constants).
| Ligand | Species | log10 | pK |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| LH3 | 11.37 ± 0.02 | 3.22 ± 0.01 |
| LH2 | 20.03 ± 0.03 | 8.66 ± 0.02 | |
| LH | 23.25 ± 0.03 | 11.37 ± 0.01 | |
|
| |||
|
| LH3 | 11.16 ± 0.04 | 3.24 ± 0.01 |
| LH2 | 19.29 ± 0.05 | 8.13 ± 0.01 | |
| LH | 22.53 ± 0.05 | 11.16 ± 0.03 | |
|
| |||
|
| LH3 | 11.08 ± 0.02 | 3.21 ± 0.02 |
| LH2 | 19.23 ± 0.03 | 8.15 ± 0.01 | |
| LH | 22.44 ± 0.03 | 11.08 ± 0.02 | |
|
| |||
|
| LH3 | 10.95 ± 0.08 | 3.74 ± 0.04 |
| LH2 | 19.24 ± 0.09 | 8.29 ± 0.03 | |
| LH | 22.98 ± 0.09 | 10.95 ± 0.05 | |
|
| |||
|
| LH3 | 11.12 ± 0.04 | 3.40 ± 0.02 |
| LH2 | 19.67 ± 0.04 | 8.55 ± 0.02 | |
| LH | 23.07 ± 0.05 | 11.12 ± 0.04 | |
|
| |||
|
| LH3 | 10.87 ± 0.05 | 3.50 ± 0.03 |
| LH2 | 19.40 ± 0.07 | 8.53 ± 0.03 | |
| LH | 22.90 ± 0.08 | 10.87 ± 0.01 | |
|
| |||
|
| LH4 | 12.70 ± 0.11 | 2.48 ± 0.07 |
| LH3 | 20.88 ± 0.13 | 3.80 ± 0.05 | |
| LH2 | 24.68 ± 0.10 | 8.18 ± 0.06 | |
| LH | 27.16 ± 0.09 | 12.70 ± 0.05 | |
The calculated H , TE and PA values with AM1 and PM3 methods for ligand and its monoprotonated forms.
| Species | AM1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| TE (kcal/mol) |
| PA | |
| H | −59403.18 | −87.83 | — |
| 1 O–H+ | −59545.75 | 84.41 | 194.96 |
| 2 S–H+ | −59560.21 | 69.95 | 209.42 |
| 3 N–H+ | −59546.16 | 83.99 | 195.38 |
| 4 O–H+ | −59513.86 | 116.30 | 163.07 |
|
| |||
| Species | PM3 | ||
| TE (kcal/mol) |
| PA | |
|
| |||
| H | −54070.31 | −101.20 | — |
| 1 O–H+ | −54238.82 | 83.77 | 182.23 |
| 2 S–H+ | −54265.61 | 57.08 | 208.92 |
| 3 N–H+ | −54242.16 | 80.53 | 185.47 |
| 4 O–H+ | −54219.39 | 103.29 | 167.71 |