Literature DB >> 24799475

Pattern of frequent but nontargeted pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis for hospitalized patients with cancer at academic medical centers: a prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter study.

Jeffrey I Zwicker1, Adam Rojan2, Federico Campigotto2, Nadia Rehman2, Renee Funches2, Gregory Connolly2, Jonathan Webster2, Anita Aggarwal2, Dalia Mobarek2, Charles Faselis2, Donna Neuberg2, Frederick R Rickles2, Ted Wun2, Michael B Streiff2, Alok A Khorana2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Hospitalized patients with cancer are considered to be at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Despite strong recommendations in numerous clinical practice guidelines, retrospective studies have shown that pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis is underutilized in hospitalized patients with cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional study of hospitalized patients with cancer at five academic hospitals to determine prescription rates of thromboprophylaxis and factors influencing its use during hospitalization.
RESULTS: A total of 775 patients with cancer were enrolled across five academic medical centers. Two hundred forty-seven patients (31.9%) had relative contraindications to pharmacologic prophylaxis. Accounting for contraindications to anticoagulation, the overall rate of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis was 74.2% (95% CI, 70.4% to 78.0%; 392 of 528 patients). Among the patients with cancer without contraindications for anticoagulation, individuals hospitalized with nonhematologic malignancies were significantly more likely to receive pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis than those with hematologic malignancies (odds ratio [OR], 2.34; 95% CI, 1.43 to 3.82; P=.007). Patients with cancer admitted for cancer therapy were significantly less likely to receive pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis than those admitted for other reasons (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.61; P<.001). Sixty-three percent of patients with cancer classified as low risk, as determined by the Padua Scoring System, received anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis. Among the 136 patients who did not receive anticoagulation, 58.8% were considered to be high risk by the Padua Scoring System.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis is frequently administered to hospitalized patients with cancer but that nearly one third of patients are considered to have relative contraindications for prophylactic anticoagulation. Pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients with cancer is commonly prescribed without regard to the presence or absence of concomitant risk factors for VTE.
© 2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24799475      PMCID: PMC4039867          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.5336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  20 in total

1.  Factors at admission associated with bleeding risk in medical patients: findings from the IMPROVE investigators.

Authors:  Hervé Decousus; Victor F Tapson; Jean-François Bergmann; Beng H Chong; James B Froehlich; Ajay K Kakkar; Geno J Merli; Manuel Monreal; Mashio Nakamura; Ricardo Pavanello; Mario Pini; Franco Piovella; Frederick A Spencer; Alex C Spyropoulos; Alexander G G Turpie; Rainer B Zotz; Gordon Fitzgerald; Frederick A Anderson
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Prevention of VTE in nonsurgical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Susan R Kahn; Wendy Lim; Andrew S Dunn; Mary Cushman; Francesco Dentali; Elie A Akl; Deborah J Cook; Alex A Balekian; Russell C Klein; Hoang Le; Sam Schulman; M Hassan Murad
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  A risk assessment model for the identification of hospitalized medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism: the Padua Prediction Score.

Authors:  S Barbar; F Noventa; V Rossetto; A Ferrari; B Brandolin; M Perlati; E De Bon; D Tormene; A Pagnan; P Prandoni
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.824

4.  Lack of evidence to support thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients with cancer.

Authors:  Marc Carrier; Alok A Khorana; Patricia Moretto; Grégoire Le Gal; Rebecca Karp; Jeffrey I Zwicker
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Duration of venous thromboembolism risk across a continuum in medically ill hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Alpesh N Amin; Helen Varker; Nicole Princic; Jay Lin; Stephen Thompson; Stephen Johnston
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.960

Review 6.  Epidemiology of cancer-associated venous thrombosis.

Authors:  Jasmijn F Timp; Sigrid K Braekkan; Henri H Versteeg; Suzanne C Cannegieter
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 7.  Anticoagulation therapy for prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolic events in cancer patients: a review of current guidelines.

Authors:  Lars J Petersen
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 12.111

Review 8.  Thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin in medical patients with cancer.

Authors:  Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Inpatient thromboprophylaxis use in U.S. hospitals: adherence to the seventh American College of Chest Physician's recommendations for at-risk medical and surgical patients.

Authors:  Alpesh N Amin; Stephen Stemkowski; Jay Lin; Guiping Yang
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.960

Review 10.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update.

Authors:  Gary H Lyman; Alok A Khorana; Nicole M Kuderer; Agnes Y Lee; Juan Ignacio Arcelus; Edward P Balaban; Jeffrey M Clarke; Christopher R Flowers; Charles W Francis; Leigh E Gates; Ajay K Kakkar; Nigel S Key; Mark N Levine; Howard A Liebman; Margaret A Tempero; Sandra L Wong; Ann Alexis Prestrud; Anna Falanga
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of mobility/immobility in thromboembolism risk assessment models for hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Fan Ye; Carolyn Stalvey; Matheen A Khuddus; David E Winchester; Hale Z Toklu; Joseph J Mazza; Steven H Yale
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Improvement of appropriate pharmacological prophylaxis in hospitalised cancer patients with a multiscreen e-alert system: a single-centre experience.

Authors:  R Figueroa; A Alfonso; J López-Picazo; I Gil-Bazo; A García-Mouriz; J Hermida; J A Páramo; R Lecumberri
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Predicting risk of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized cancer patients: Utility of a risk assessment tool.

Authors:  Rushad Patell; Lisa Rybicki; Keith R McCrae; Alok A Khorana
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 10.047

Review 4.  Cancer and Venous Thromboembolic Disease: A Review.

Authors:  Eoin Donnellan; Alok A Khorana
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-02-07

5.  Prediction and Prevention of Cancer-Associated Thromboembolism.

Authors:  Alok A Khorana; Maria T DeSancho; Howard Liebman; Rachel Rosovsky; Jean M Connors; Jeffrey Zwicker
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-12-04

6.  Assessment of adherence to cancer-associated venous thromboembolism guideline and pharmacist's impact on anticoagulant therapy.

Authors:  Esin Aysel Kandemir; Aygin Bayraktar-Ekincioglu; Saadettin Kilickap
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  An update on the global use of risk assessment models and thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients with medical illnesses from the World Thrombosis Day steering committee: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gabor Forgo; Evy Micieli; Walter Ageno; Lana A Castellucci; Gabriela Cesarman-Maus; Henry Ddungu; Erich Vinicius De Paula; Mert Dumantepe; Maria Cecilia Guillermo Esposito; Stavros V Konstantinides; Nils Kucher; Claire McLintock; Fionnuala Ní Áinle; Alex C Spyropoulos; Tetsumei Urano; Beverley J Hunt; Stefano Barco
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 16.036

Review 8.  Antithrombotic therapy for prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: review of the literature on current practice and emerging options.

Authors:  Cihan Ay; Pieter Willem Kamphuisen; Giancarlo Agnelli
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2017-06-08

9.  Insights into venous thromboembolism prevention in hospitalized cancer patients: Lessons from a prospective study.

Authors:  Rocío Figueroa; Ana Alfonso; José López-Picazo; Ignacio Gil-Bazo; Alberto García-Mouriz; José Hermida; José Antonio Páramo; Ramón Lecumberri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cancer associated thrombosis and mortality in patients with cancer stratified by khorana score risk levels.

Authors:  Alok A Khorana; Nicole M Kuderer; Keith McCrae; Dejan Milentijevic; Guillaume Germain; François Laliberté; Sean D MacKnight; Patrick Lefebvre; Gary H Lyman; Michael B Streiff
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-09-20       Impact factor: 4.452

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.