Literature DB >> 24798273

Surotomycin demonstrates low in vitro frequency of resistance and rapid bactericidal activity in Clostridium difficile, Enterococcus faecalis, and Enterococcus faecium.

Carmela T M Mascio1, Laurent Chesnel2, Grace Thorne2, Jared A Silverman2.   

Abstract

Surotomycin (CB-183,315) is an orally administered, minimally absorbed, selective bactericidal cyclic lipopeptide in phase 3 development for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. The aim of this study was to evaluate the emergence of resistance in C. difficile (ATCC 700057 and three recent clinical isolates from the restriction endonuclease analysis groups BI, BK, and K), vancomycin-susceptible (VS) Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 49452), vancomycin-resistant (VR) E. faecalis (ATCC 700802), VS Enterococcus faecium (ATCC 6569), and VR E. faecium (ATCC 51559) under anaerobic conditions. The rate of spontaneous resistance was below the limit of detection (<10(-8) to <10(-9)) for surotomycin at 16 and 32× the MIC for all isolates tested. Under selective pressure by serial passage, C. difficile grew in a maximum of 4 μg/ml surotomycin (final MICs of 2 to 8 μg/ml [4- to 16-fold higher than those of the naive control]) at day 15, with the exception of the C. difficile BK strain, which grew in 16 to 32 μg/ml (final MICs of 8 to 32 μg/ml [16- to 64-fold higher than those of the naive control]). Enterococci remained relatively unchanged over 15 days, growing in a maximum of 8 μg/ml surotomycin (final MICs of 2 to 16 μg/ml [8- to 64-fold higher than those of the naive control]). Of the isolates tested, no cross-resistance to vancomycin, rifampin, ampicillin, metronidazole, or moxifloxacin was observed. Surotomycin at 20× MIC demonstrated equally rapid bactericidal activity (≥ 3-log-unit reduction in CFU/ml in ≤ 8 h) against naive and reduced-susceptibility isolates of C. difficile, VS Enterococcus (VSE), and VR Enterococcus (VRE), except for C. difficile BK (2.6-log-unit reductions for both). These results suggest that emergence of resistance to surotomycin against C. difficile, E. faecalis, and E. faecium is likely to be rare.
Copyright © 2014, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24798273      PMCID: PMC4068600          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00124-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  19 in total

1.  Resistance studies with daptomycin.

Authors:  J A Silverman; N Oliver; T Andrew; T Li
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  L Clifford McDonald; George E Killgore; Angela Thompson; Robert C Owens; Sophia V Kazakova; Susan P Sambol; Stuart Johnson; Dale N Gerding
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Clostridium difficile colitis.

Authors:  C P Kelly; C Pothoulakis; J T LaMont
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-01-27       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Relatively poor outcome after treatment of Clostridium difficile colitis with metronidazole.

Authors:  Daniel M Musher; Saima Aslam; Nancy Logan; Srikanth Nallacheru; Imran Bhaila; Franziska Borchert; Richard J Hamill
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2005-04-25       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Reassessment of Clostridium difficile susceptibility to metronidazole and vancomycin.

Authors:  T Peláez; L Alcalá; R Alonso; M Rodríguez-Créixems; J M García-Lechuz; E Bouza
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Faecal metronidazole concentrations during oral and intravenous therapy for antibiotic associated colitis due to Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  R P Bolton; M A Culshaw
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Emergence of reduced susceptibility to metronidazole in Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Simon D Baines; Rachael O'Connor; Jane Freeman; Warren N Fawley; Celine Harmanus; Paola Mastrantonio; Ed J Kuijper; Mark H Wilcox
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  A comparison of vancomycin and metronidazole for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, stratified by disease severity.

Authors:  Fred A Zar; Srinivasa R Bakkanagari; K M L S T Moorthi; Melinda B Davis
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 9.  Genomic transition of enterococci from gut commensals to leading causes of multidrug-resistant hospital infection in the antibiotic era.

Authors:  Michael S Gilmore; Francois Lebreton; Willem van Schaik
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 7.934

10.  Outcomes of Clostridium difficile-associated disease treated with metronidazole or vancomycin before and after the emergence of NAP1/027.

Authors:  Jacques Pépin; Louis Valiquette; Sandra Gagnon; Sophie Routhier; Isabel Brazeau
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  16 in total

1.  Effects of surotomycin on Clostridium difficile viability and toxin production in vitro.

Authors:  Laurent Bouillaut; Shonna McBride; Joseph A Sorg; Diane J Schmidt; José M Suarez; Saul Tzipori; Carmela Mascio; Laurent Chesnel; A L Sonenshein
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Mutations associated with reduced surotomycin susceptibility in Clostridium difficile and Enterococcus species.

Authors:  Hannah M Adams; Xiang Li; Carmela Mascio; Laurent Chesnel; Kelli L Palmer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Impact of Surotomycin on the Gut Microbiota of Healthy Volunteers in a Phase 1 Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Diane M Citron; Kerin L Tyrrell; Suzanne E Dale; Laurent Chesnel; Ellie J C Goldstein
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Mode of action and bactericidal properties of surotomycin against growing and nongrowing Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Mohammed Zahidul Alam; Xiaoqian Wu; Carmela Mascio; Laurent Chesnel; Julian G Hurdle
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Clostridium difficile infection: Updates in management.

Authors:  Raseen Tariq; Sahil Khanna
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-20

6.  Characterization of Class IIa Bacteriocin Resistance in Enterococcus faecium.

Authors:  Kathryn Geldart; Yiannis N Kaznessis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Evaluating the Effects of Surotomycin Treatment on Clostridium difficile Toxin A and B Production, Immune Response, and Morphological Changes.

Authors:  Bradley T Endres; Eugénie Bassères; Mohammed Khaleduzzaman; M Jahangir Alam; Laurent Chesnel; Kevin W Garey
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Discovery and development of surotomycin for the treatment of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Victoria Knight-Connoni; Carmela Mascio; Laurent Chesnel; Jared Silverman
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.346

9.  Impact of Variations in Test Method Parameters on In Vitro Activity of Surotomycin against Clostridium difficile and Surotomycin Quality Control Limits for Broth Microdilution and Agar Dilution Susceptibility Testing.

Authors:  Maria M Traczewski; Jennifer Deane; Daniel Sahm; Steven D Brown; Laurent Chesnel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  Antibacterials Developed to Target a Single Organism: Mechanisms and Frequencies of Reduced Susceptibility to the Novel Anti-Clostridium difficile Compounds Fidaxomicin and LFF571.

Authors:  Jennifer A Leeds
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 6.915

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.