Literature DB >> 24797073

Synapsis alters RAG-mediated nicking at Tcrb recombination signal sequences: implications for the “beyond 12/23” rule.

Joydeep K Banerjee, David G Schatz.   

Abstract

At the Tcrb locus, Vβ-to-Jβ rearrangement is permitted by the 12/23 rule but is not observed in vivo, a restriction termed the “beyond 12/23” rule (B12/23 rule). Previous work showed that Vβ recombination signal sequences (RSSs) do not recombine with Jβ RSSs because Jβ RSSs are crippled for either nicking or synapsis. This result raised the following question: how can crippled Jβ RSSs recombine with Dβ RSSs? We report here that the nicking of some Jβ RSSs can be substantially stimulated by synapsis with a 3′Dβ1 partner RSS. This result helps to reconcile disagreement in the field regarding the impact of synapsis on nicking. Furthermore, our data allow for the classification of Tcrb RSSs into two major categories: those that nick quickly and those that nick slowly in the absence of a partner. Slow-nicking RSSs can be stimulated to nick more efficiently upon synapsis with an appropriate B12/23 partner, and our data unexpectedly suggest that fast-nicking RSSs can be inhibited for nicking upon synapsis with an inappropriate partner. These observations indicate that the RAG proteins exert fine control over every step of V(D)J cleavage and support the hypothesis that initial RAG binding can occur on RSSs with either 12- or 23-bp spacers (12- or 23-RSSs, respectively).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24797073      PMCID: PMC4097660          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00411-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  50 in total

1.  DNA-Rag protein interactions in the control of selective D gene utilization in the TCR beta locus.

Authors:  Alexandru Olaru; Dimeka N Patterson; Isabelle Villey; Ferenc Livák
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  DNA sequence and structure requirements for cleavage of V(D)J recombination signal sequences.

Authors:  C A Cuomo; C L Mundy; M A Oettinger
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Distinct DNA sequence and structure requirements for the two steps of V(D)J recombination signal cleavage.

Authors:  D A Ramsden; J F McBlane; D C van Gent; M Gellert
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-06-17       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Stimulation of V(D)J cleavage by high mobility group proteins.

Authors:  D C van Gent; K Hiom; T T Paull; M Gellert
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  The 12/23 rule is enforced at the cleavage step of V(D)J recombination in vivo.

Authors:  S B Steen; L Gomelsky; D B Roth
Journal:  Genes Cells       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Asymmetric processing of coding ends and the effect of coding end nucleotide composition on V(D)J recombination.

Authors:  U R Ezekiel; P Engler; D Stern; U Storb
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 31.745

7.  Conservation of sequence in recombination signal sequence spacers.

Authors:  D A Ramsden; K Baetz; G E Wu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-05-25       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Initiation of V(D)J recombination in vitro obeying the 12/23 rule.

Authors:  Q M Eastman; T M Leu; D G Schatz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Cleavage at a V(D)J recombination signal requires only RAG1 and RAG2 proteins and occurs in two steps.

Authors:  J F McBlane; D C van Gent; D A Ramsden; C Romeo; C A Cuomo; M Gellert; M A Oettinger
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1995-11-03       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Coding end sequence can markedly affect the initiation of V(D)J recombination.

Authors:  R M Gerstein; M R Lieber
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 11.361

View more
  7 in total

1.  Mapping and Quantitation of the Interaction between the Recombination Activating Gene Proteins RAG1 and RAG2.

Authors:  Yu-Hang Zhang; Keerthi Shetty; Marius D Surleac; Andrei J Petrescu; David G Schatz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  RAG gene defects at the verge of immunodeficiency and immune dysregulation.

Authors:  Anna Villa; Luigi D Notarangelo
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 12.988

3.  The architecture of the 12RSS in V(D)J recombination signal and synaptic complexes.

Authors:  Mihai Ciubotaru; Marius D Surleac; Lauren Ann Metskas; Peter Koo; Elizabeth Rhoades; Andrei J Petrescu; David G Schatz
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  Riches in RAGs: Revealing the V(D)J Recombinase through High-Resolution Structures.

Authors:  Karla K Rodgers
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 13.807

Review 5.  Assembly and Expression of Shark Ig Genes.

Authors:  Ellen Hsu
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  A study on endonuclease BspD6I and its stimulus-responsive switching by modified oligonucleotides.

Authors:  Liudmila A Abrosimova; Anzhela Yu Migur; Elena A Kubareva; Timofei S Zatsepin; Aleksandra V Gavshina; Alfiya K Yunusova; Tatiana A Perevyazova; Alfred Pingoud; Tatiana S Oretskaya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Poor quality Vβ recombination signal sequences stochastically enforce TCRβ allelic exclusion.

Authors:  Glendon S Wu; Katherine S Yang-Iott; Morgann A Klink; Katharina E Hayer; Kyutae D Lee; Craig H Bassing
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 14.307

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.