OBJECTIVE: This study examines the effects of parental lisdexamfetamine (LDX) treatment on parent-child interactions. METHODS:Participants were 30 parents (27% were male) and their children aged 5-12 years, both diagnosed with DSM-IV attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Optimal LDX dose (30, 50, or 70 mg/day) was determined for parents during a 3-week open-label titration, followed by a within-subjects trial of the acute impact of LDX and placebo on observable parent-child interactions. Two laboratory-based, parent-child interactions simulating typical family tasks (e.g., homework, joint play) were conducted within 2 weeks, once with the adult on a blinded optimal dose of LDX and once on placebo (phase I). Parents were then randomly assigned to continue blinded treatment with LDX or placebo for another month followed by a third interaction task (phase II) to assess the ongoing effects of LDX on parent-child interactions. The primary outcome was the change in rate of parenting behaviors coded during the parent-child interaction tasks. Secondary outcomes included observed rates of children's inappropriate behaviors during the laboratory tasks and changes in parental ADHD symptom severity (ADHD-Rating Scale). RESULTS:Twenty parents (67%) completed the trial. In phase I, medication was associated with a significant reduction in negative talk by parents (p = 0.0066, d = -0.47). There was a Medication × Task interaction (p = 0.0235) with a reduction in children's negative behaviors in the homework phase only (p = 0.0154, d = -0.58). In phase II, LDX was associated with significant increases in praise by parents (d = 0.81) and reductions in parental commands (d = -0.88) and children's inappropriate behaviors (d = -0.84) (all p-values < 0.05). While not reaching statistical significance, LDX was also associated with large reductions in parental verbalizations (d = -0.82), moderate increases in parental responsiveness (d = 0.55), and large reductions in the ratio of commands to verbalizations during the non-homework task (d = -1.05) (all p-values < 0.10). Significant reductions in parental ADHD symptoms vs. placebo were observed (p < 0.005). Loss of appetite, dry mouth, headaches, and delayed sleep onset were the most common adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in parent-child interactions emerged over time with LDX treatment of parental ADHD. Results suggest that pharmacological treatment of parental ADHD may improve outcomes in parents and their children.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: This study examines the effects of parental lisdexamfetamine (LDX) treatment on parent-child interactions. METHODS:Participants were 30 parents (27% were male) and their children aged 5-12 years, both diagnosed with DSM-IV attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Optimal LDX dose (30, 50, or 70 mg/day) was determined for parents during a 3-week open-label titration, followed by a within-subjects trial of the acute impact of LDX and placebo on observable parent-child interactions. Two laboratory-based, parent-child interactions simulating typical family tasks (e.g., homework, joint play) were conducted within 2 weeks, once with the adult on a blinded optimal dose of LDX and once on placebo (phase I). Parents were then randomly assigned to continue blinded treatment with LDX or placebo for another month followed by a third interaction task (phase II) to assess the ongoing effects of LDX on parent-child interactions. The primary outcome was the change in rate of parenting behaviors coded during the parent-child interaction tasks. Secondary outcomes included observed rates of children's inappropriate behaviors during the laboratory tasks and changes in parental ADHD symptom severity (ADHD-Rating Scale). RESULTS: Twenty parents (67%) completed the trial. In phase I, medication was associated with a significant reduction in negative talk by parents (p = 0.0066, d = -0.47). There was a Medication × Task interaction (p = 0.0235) with a reduction in children's negative behaviors in the homework phase only (p = 0.0154, d = -0.58). In phase II, LDX was associated with significant increases in praise by parents (d = 0.81) and reductions in parental commands (d = -0.88) and children's inappropriate behaviors (d = -0.84) (all p-values < 0.05). While not reaching statistical significance, LDX was also associated with large reductions in parental verbalizations (d = -0.82), moderate increases in parental responsiveness (d = 0.55), and large reductions in the ratio of commands to verbalizations during the non-homework task (d = -1.05) (all p-values < 0.10). Significant reductions in parental ADHD symptoms vs. placebo were observed (p < 0.005). Loss of appetite, dry mouth, headaches, and delayed sleep onset were the most common adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in parent-child interactions emerged over time with LDX treatment of parental ADHD. Results suggest that pharmacological treatment of parental ADHD may improve outcomes in parents and their children.
Authors: Andrea M Chronis; Benjamin B Lahey; William E Pelham; Stephanie Hall Williams; Barbara L Baumann; Heidi Kipp; Heather A Jones; Paul J Rathouz Journal: Dev Psychol Date: 2007-01
Authors: Andrea Chronis-Tuscano; Mary Rooney; Karen E Seymour; Heather Jones Lavin; Jessica Pian; Adelaide Robb; Lisa Efron; Charles Conlon; Mark A Stein Journal: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol Date: 2010
Authors: Brooke S G Molina; William E Pelham; JeeWon Cheong; Michael P Marshal; Elizabeth M Gnagy; Patrick J Curran Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2012-07-30
Authors: Andrea M Chronis; Benjamin B Lahey; William E Pelham; Heidi L Kipp; Barbara L Baumann; Steve S Lee Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Michael C Meinzer; Jeremy W Pettit; James G Waxmonsky; Elizabeth Gnagy; Brooke S G Molina; William E Pelham Journal: J Abnorm Child Psychol Date: 2016-05
Authors: Alexander Häge; Barbara Alm; Tobias Banaschewski; Katja Becker; Michael Colla; Christine Freitag; Julia Geissler; Alexander von Gontard; Erika Graf; Barbara Haack-Dees; Susann Hänig; Klaus Hennighausen; Sarah Hohmann; Christian Jacob; Charlotte Jaite; Christine Jennen-Steinmetz; Viola Kappel; Swantje Matthies; Alexandra Philipsen; Luise Poustka; Wolfgang Retz; Michael Rösler; Katja Schneider-Momm; Esther Sobanski; Timo D Vloet; Andreas Warnke; Thomas Jans Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2018-01-23 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Dara E Babinski; James G Waxmonsky; Daniel A Waschbusch; Hugh Humphrey; Alexandra Alfonso; Kathleen I Crum; Melissa Bernstein; Janine Slavec; Junea N Augustus; William E Pelham Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 2.576
Authors: Julia M Geissler; Timo D Vloet; Nora Strom; Charlotte Jaite; Erika Graf; Viola Kappel; Andreas Warnke; Christian Jacob; Klaus Hennighausen; Barbara Haack-Dees; Katja Schneider-Momm; Swantje Matthies; Michael Rösler; Wolfgang Retz; Susann Hänig; Alexander von Gontard; Esther Sobanski; Barbara Alm; Sarah Hohmann; Luise Poustka; Michael Colla; Laura Gentschow; Christine M Freitag; Alexander Häge; Martin Holtmann; Katja Becker; Alexandra Philipsen; Thomas Jans Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2019-12-05 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Erin N Schoenfelder; Andrea Chronis-Tuscano; Jennifer Strickland; Daniel Almirall; Mark A Stein Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Date: 2019-04-13 Impact factor: 2.576
Authors: Andrea Chronis-Tuscano; Christine H Wang; Jennifer Strickland; Daniel Almirall; Mark A Stein Journal: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol Date: 2016-01-22