Literature DB >> 20051220

A comparison of the efficacy of medications for adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder using meta-analysis of effect sizes.

Stephen V Faraone1, Stephen J Glatt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Medications used to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults have been well researched, but comparisons among drugs are hindered by the absence of direct comparative trials. Our objectives were to (1) estimate the effect size of the medications used to treat adult ADHD, (2) determine if differences in the designs of studies confound comparisons of medication efficacy, (3) quantify the evidence for differences in effect sizes among medications, and (4) see if features of study design influence estimates of efficacy. DATA SOURCES: The following search engines were used: PubMed, Ovid, ERIC, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PREMEDLINE, the Cochrane database, e-psyche, and Social Sciences Abstracts. Presentations from the American Psychiatric Association and American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry meetings were reviewed. STUDY SELECTION: A literature search was conducted to identify double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of ADHD in adults published in English after 1979. Only trials that used DSM-III, -III-R, or -IV ADHD criteria and followed subjects for > or = 2 weeks were selected. DATA EXTRACTION: Meta-analysis regression assessed the influence of medication type and study design features on medication effects.
RESULTS: Nineteen trials met criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. These trials studied 13 drugs using 18 different outcome measures of hyperactive, inattentive, or impulsive behavior. After trials were stratified on the class of drug studied (short-acting stimulant vs long-acting stimulant vs nonstimulant), significant differences in effect size were observed between stimulant and nonstimulant medications (P = .006 and P = .0001, respectively, for short- and long-acting stimulants vs nonstimulants), but the effect for short-acting stimulants was not significant after correcting for study design features. The effect sizes for each drug class were similar in magnitude to what we previously reported for medication treatment studies of children with ADHD. We found significant heterogeneity of effect sizes for short-acting stimulants (P < .001) but not for other medication groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Although both stimulant and nonstimulant medications are effective for treating ADHD in adults, stimulant medications show greater efficacy for the short durations of treatment characteristic of placebo-controlled studies. We found no significant differences between short- and long-acting stimulant medications. Study design features vary widely among studies and can confound indirect comparisons unless addressed statistically as we have done in this study. 2010 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20051220     DOI: 10.4088/JCP.08m04902pur

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  95 in total

1.  Discontinuation of pharmacological treatment of children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: meta-analysis of 63 studies enrolling 11,788 patients.

Authors:  M Riera; X Castells; A Tobias; R Cunill; L Blanco; D Capellà
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Effect of psychostimulants on brain structure and function in ADHD: a qualitative literature review of magnetic resonance imaging-based neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Thomas J Spencer; Ariel Brown; Larry J Seidman; Eve M Valera; Nikos Makris; Alexandra Lomedico; Stephen V Faraone; Joseph Biederman
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.384

3.  Clinical correlates of working memory deficits in youth with and without ADHD: A controlled study.

Authors:  Ronna Fried; James Chan; Leah Feinberg; Amanda Pope; K Yvonne Woodworth; Stephen V Faraone; Joseph Biederman
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.475

Review 4.  Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder with inadequate response to stimulants: approaches to management.

Authors:  Ann C Childress; Floyd R Sallee
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 5.  Raising attention to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Stefano Pallanti; Luana Salerno
Journal:  World J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-03-22

Review 6.  The pharmacology of amphetamine and methylphenidate: Relevance to the neurobiology of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and other psychiatric comorbidities.

Authors:  Stephen V Faraone
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study of α4β2 agonist ABT-894 in adults with ADHD.

Authors:  Earle E Bain; Weining Robieson; Yili Pritchett; Tushar Garimella; Walid Abi-Saab; George Apostol; James J McGough; Mario D Saltarelli
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 7.853

8.  Assessing treatment outcomes in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a narrative review.

Authors:  Jeffery N Epstein; Margaret D Weiss
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2012-11-29

Review 9.  Association of ADHD medications with the risk of cardiovascular diseases: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hui Liu; Wenjing Feng; Dongfeng Zhang
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.785

Review 10.  Neurocognitive enhancement or impairment? A systematic meta-analysis of prescription stimulant effects on processing speed, decision-making, planning, and cognitive perseveration.

Authors:  Marisa E Marraccini; Lisa L Weyandt; Joseph S Rossi; Bergljot Gyda Gudmundsdottir
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.