Literature DB >> 30091808

Amphetamines for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults.

Xavier Castells1, Lídia Blanco-Silvente, Ruth Cunill.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a childhood-onset disorder characterised by inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. ADHD can persist into adulthood and can affects individuals' social and occupational functioning, as well as their quality of life and health. ADHD is frequently associated with other mental disorders such as substance use disorders and anxiety and affective disorders. Amphetamines are used to treat adults with ADHD, but uncertainties about their efficacy and safety remain.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the efficacy and safety of amphetamines for adults with ADHD. SEARCH
METHODS: In August 2017, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, 10 other databases, and two trials registers, and we ran citation searches for included studies. We also contacted the corresponding authors of all included studies, other experts in the field, and the pharmaceutical company, Shire, and we searched the reference lists of retrieved studies and reviews for other published, unpublished, or ongoing studies. For each included study, we performed a citation search in Web of Science to identify any later studies that may have cited it. SELECTION CRITERIA: We searched for randomised controlled trials comparing the efficacy of amphetamines (at any dose) for ADHD in adults aged 18 years and over against placebo or an active intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors extracted data from each included study. We used the standardised mean difference (SMD) and the risk ratio (RR) to assess continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively. We conducted a stratified analysis to determine the influence of moderating variables. We assessed trials for risk of bias and drew a funnel plot to investigate the possibility of publication bias. We rated the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach, which yielded high, moderate, low, or very low quality ratings based on evaluation of within-trial risk of bias, directness of evidence, heterogeneity of data; precision of effect estimates, and risk of publication bias. MAIN
RESULTS: We included 19 studies that investigated three types of amphetamines: dexamphetamine (10.2 mg/d to 21.8 mg/d), lisdexamfetamine (30 mg/d to 70 mg/d), and mixed amphetamine salts (MAS; 12.5 mg/d to 80 mg/d). These studies enrolled 2521 participants; most were middle-aged (35.3 years), Caucasian males (57.2%), with a combined type of ADHD (78.8%). Eighteen studies were conducted in the USA, and one study was conducted in both Canada and the USA. Ten were multi-site studies. All studies were placebo-controlled, and three also included an active comparator: guanfacine, modafinil, or paroxetine. Most studies had short-term follow-up and a mean study length of 5.3 weeks.We found no studies that had low risk of bias in all domains of the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool, mainly because amphetamines have powerful subjective effects that may reveal the assigned treatment, but also because we noted attrition bias, and because we could not rule out the possibility of a carry-over effect in studies that used a cross-over design.Sixteen studies were funded by the pharmaceutical industry, one study was publicly funded, and two studies did not report their funding sources.Amphetamines versus placeboSeverity of ADHD symptoms: we found low- to very low-quality evidence suggesting that amphetamines reduced the severity of ADHD symptoms as rated by clinicians (SMD -0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.04 to -0.75; 13 studies, 2028 participants) and patients (SMD -0.51, 95% CI -0.75 to -0.28; six studies, 120 participants).Retention: overall, we found low-quality evidence suggesting that amphetamines did not improve retention in treatment (risk ratio (RR) 1.06, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.13; 17 studies, 2323 participants).Adverse events: we found that amphetamines were associated with an increased proportion of patients who withdrew because of adverse events (RR 2.69, 95% CI 1.63 to 4.45; 17 studies, 2409 participants).Type of amphetamine: we found differences between amphetamines for the severity of ADHD symptoms as rated by clinicians. Both lisdexamfetamine (SMD -1.06, 95% CI -1.26 to -0.85; seven studies, 896 participants; low-quality evidence) and MAS (SMD -0.80, 95% CI -0.93 to -0.66; five studies, 1083 participants; low-quality evidence) reduced the severity of ADHD symptoms. In contrast, we found no evidence to suggest that dexamphetamine reduced the severity of ADHD symptoms (SMD -0.24, 95% CI -0.80 to 0.32; one study, 49 participants; very low-quality evidence). In addition, all amphetamines were efficacious in reducing the severity of ADHD symptoms as rated by patients (dexamphetamine: SMD -0.77, 95% CI -1.14 to -0.40; two studies, 35 participants; low-quality evidence; lisdexamfetamine: SMD -0.33, 95% CI -0.65 to -0.01; three studies, 67 participants; low-quality evidence; MAS: SMD -0.45, 95% CI -1.02 to 0.12; one study, 18 participants; very low-quality evidence).Dose at study completion: different doses of amphetamines did not appear to be associated with differences in efficacy.Type of drug-release formulation: we investigated immediate- and sustained-release formulations but found no differences between them for any outcome.Amphetamines versus other drugsWe found no evidence that amphetamines improved ADHD symptom severity compared to other drug interventions. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Amphetamines improved the severity of ADHD symptoms, as assessed by clinicians or patients, in the short term but did not improve retention to treatment. Amphetamines were associated with higher attrition due to adverse events. The short duration of studies coupled with their restrictive inclusion criteria limits the external validity of these findings. Furthermore, none of the included studies had an overall low risk of bias. Overall, the evidence generated by this review is of low or very low quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30091808      PMCID: PMC6513464          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007813.pub3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  129 in total

1.  Long-acting stimulants for the treatment of attention-deficit disorder in cocaine-dependent adults.

Authors:  R Castaneda; R Levy; M Hardy; M Trujillo
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Comparing guanfacine and dextroamphetamine for the treatment of adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  F B Taylor; J Russo
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.153

3.  Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues.

Authors:  Diana R Elbourne; Douglas G Altman; Julian P T Higgins; Francois Curtin; Helen V Worthington; Andy Vail
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Efficacy of modafinil compared to dextroamphetamine for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults.

Authors:  F B Taylor; J Russo
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.576

5.  Age-dependent decline of symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: impact of remission definition and symptom type.

Authors:  J Biederman; E Mick; S V Faraone
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 18.112

6.  Subjective and behavioral effects of repeated d-amphetamine in humans.

Authors:  S R Wachtel; H de Wit
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.293

7.  Efficacy of a mixed amphetamine salts compound in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  T Spencer; J Biederman; T Wilens; S Faraone; J Prince; K Gerard; R Doyle; A Parekh; J Kagan; S K Bearman
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2001-08

8.  A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of dexamphetamine in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  R Paterson; C Douglas; J Hallmayer; M Hagan; Z Krupenia
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.744

9.  Driving in young adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: knowledge, performance, adverse outcomes, and the role of executive functioning.

Authors:  Russell A Barkley; Kevin R Murphy; George I Dupaul; Tracie Bush
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.892

10.  Efficacy of Adderall and methylphenidate in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a drug-placebo and drug-drug response curve analysis of a naturalistic study.

Authors:  Stephen V Faraone; Elizabeth J Short; Joseph Biederman; Robert L Findling; Christine Roe; Michael J Manos
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.176

View more
  21 in total

1.  Tai Chi training for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A feasibility trial in college students.

Authors:  Alexander K Converse; Bruce P Barrett; Betty A Chewning; Peter M Wayne
Journal:  Complement Ther Med       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 2.446

2.  Resveratrol adjunct to methylphenidate improves symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Maryam Rafeiy-Torghabeh; Amir Ashraf-Ganjouei; Kamyar Moradi; Sayna Bagheri; Mohammad-Reza Mohammadi; Shahin Akhondzadeh
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 4.785

3.  The efficacy of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies for mental disorders in adults: an umbrella review and meta-analytic evaluation of recent meta-analyses.

Authors:  Falk Leichsenring; Christiane Steinert; Sven Rabung; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 4.  Extended-release methylphenidate for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults.

Authors:  Kim Boesen; Asger Sand Paludan-Müller; Peter C Gøtzsche; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-02-24

5.  Characterizing prescription stimulant nonmedical use (NMU) among adults recruited from Reddit.

Authors:  Suzanne K Vosburg; Rebekkah S Robbins; Kevin M Antshel; Stephen V Faraone; Jody L Green
Journal:  Addict Behav Rep       Date:  2021-09-11

6.  Prevalence and Risk Factors Associated With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Among US Black Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jude Mary Cénat; Camille Blais-Rochette; Catherine Morse; Marie-Pier Vandette; Pari-Gole Noorishad; Cary Kogan; Assumpta Ndengeyingoma; Patrick R Labelle
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 21.596

7.  Immediate-release methylphenidate for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults.

Authors:  Raissa Carolina F Cândido; Cristiane A Menezes de Padua; Su Golder; Daniela R Junqueira
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-01-18

8.  EMA and FDA psychiatric drug trial guidelines: assessment of guideline development and trial design recommendations.

Authors:  Kim Boesen; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 6.892

Review 9.  Lifetime evolution of ADHD treatment.

Authors:  Federico Mucci; Barbara Carpita; Giovanni Pagni; Alessandra Della Vecchia; Sarah Bjedov; Andrea Pozza; Donatella Marazziti
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 3.850

10.  Long-term deficits in risky decision-making after traumatic brain injury on a rat analog of the Iowa gambling task.

Authors:  Trinity K Shaver; Jenny E Ozga; Binxing Zhu; Karen G Anderson; Kris M Martens; Cole Vonder Haar
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 3.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.