Literature DB >> 24794718

Endonucleases: new tools to edit the mouse genome.

Tobias Wijshake1, Darren J Baker2, Bart van de Sluis3.   

Abstract

Mouse transgenesis has been instrumental in determining the function of genes in the pathophysiology of human diseases and modification of genes by homologous recombination in mouse embryonic stem cells remains a widely used technology. However, this approach harbors a number of disadvantages, as it is time-consuming and quite laborious. Over the last decade a number of new genome editing technologies have been developed, including zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated (CRISPR/Cas). These systems are characterized by a designed DNA binding protein or RNA sequence fused or co-expressed with a non-specific endonuclease, respectively. The engineered DNA binding protein or RNA sequence guides the nuclease to a specific target sequence in the genome to induce a double strand break. The subsequent activation of the DNA repair machinery then enables the introduction of gene modifications at the target site, such as gene disruption, correction or insertion. Nuclease-mediated genome editing has numerous advantages over conventional gene targeting, including increased efficiency in gene editing, reduced generation time of mutant mice, and the ability to mutagenize multiple genes simultaneously. Although nuclease-driven modifications in the genome are a powerful tool to generate mutant mice, there are concerns about off-target cleavage, especially when using the CRISPR/Cas system. Here, we describe the basic principles of these new strategies in mouse genome manipulation, their inherent advantages, and their potential disadvantages compared to current technologies used to study gene function in mouse models. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: From Genome to Function.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR/Cas; Endonucleases; Genome editing; Mouse; TALEN; ZFN

Year:  2014        PMID: 24794718     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.04.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta        ISSN: 0006-3002


  23 in total

1.  Efficient, complete deletion of synaptic proteins using CRISPR.

Authors:  Salvatore Incontro; Cedric S Asensio; Robert H Edwards; Roger A Nicoll
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 2.  Structural and molecular bases of rod photoreceptor morphogenesis and disease.

Authors:  Theodore G Wensel; Zhixian Zhang; Ivan A Anastassov; Jared C Gilliam; Feng He; Michael F Schmid; Michael A Robichaux
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 21.198

Review 3.  Recent developments and clinical studies utilizing engineered zinc finger nuclease technology.

Authors:  Young-Il Jo; Hyongbum Kim; Suresh Ramakrishna
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 4.  Unraveling the genetic architecture of copy number variants associated with schizophrenia and other neuropsychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Timothy P Rutkowski; Jason P Schroeder; Georgette M Gafford; Stephen T Warren; David Weinshenker; Tamara Caspary; Jennifer G Mulle
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 5.  Molecular changes and signaling events occurring in spermatozoa during epididymal maturation.

Authors:  M G Gervasi; P E Visconti
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.842

Review 6.  Developmental Genetics and Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and Urinary Tract.

Authors:  Natalie Uy; Kimberly Reidy
Journal:  J Pediatr Genet       Date:  2015-09-07

Review 7.  The old and new face of craniofacial research: How animal models inform human craniofacial genetic and clinical data.

Authors:  Eric Van Otterloo; Trevor Williams; Kristin Bruk Artinger
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 8.  Interpreting human genetic variation with in vivo zebrafish assays.

Authors:  Erica E Davis; Stephan Frangakis; Nicholas Katsanis
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2014-06-02

Review 9.  What Have We Learned from Glycosyltransferase Knockouts in Mice?

Authors:  Pamela Stanley
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 10.  Using CRISPR/Cas to study gene function and model disease in vivo.

Authors:  Darjus F Tschaharganeh; Scott W Lowe; Ralph J Garippa; Geulah Livshits
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 5.542

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.