Marcelo Victor Pires de Sousa1, Cleber Ferraresi2, Ana Carolina de Magalhães3, Elisabeth Mateus Yoshimura3, Michael R Hamblin4. 1. Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Laboratory of Radiation Dosimetry and Medical Physics, Institute of Physics, São Paulo University, São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: marcelovictor@usp.br. 2. Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Laboratory of Electro-thermo-phototherapy, Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil; Post-Graduation Program in Biotechnology, Federal University of São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil; Optics Group, Physics Institute of Sao Carlos, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil. 3. Laboratory of Radiation Dosimetry and Medical Physics, Institute of Physics, São Paulo University, São Paulo, Brazil. 4. Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, Department of Dermatology, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A von Frey filament (vFF) is a type of aesthesiometer usually made of nylon perpendicularly held in a base. It can be used in paw withdrawal pain threshold assessment, one of the most popular tests for pain evaluation using animal models. For this test, a set of filaments, each able to exert a different force, is applied to the animal paw, from the weakest to the strongest, until the paw is withdrawn. NEW METHOD: We made 20 low cost vFF using nylon filaments of different lengths and constant diameter glued perpendicularly to the ends of popsicle sticks. They were calibrated using a laboratory balance scale. Building and calibrating took around 4h and confirmed the theoretical prediction that the force exerted is inversely proportional to the length and directly proportional to the width of the filament. RESULTS: The calibration showed that they were precise and accurate. We analyzed the paw withdrawal threshold assessed with the set of home-made vFF and with a high quality commercial set of 5 monofilaments vFF (Stoelting, Wood Dale, USA) in two groups (n=5) of healthy mice. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: The home-made vFF precisely and accurately measured the hind paw withdrawal threshold (20.3±0.9 g). The commercial vFF have different diameters while our set has the same diameter avoiding the problem of lower sensitivity to larger diameter filaments. CONCLUSION: Building a set of vFF is easy, cost effective, and depending on the kind of tests, can increase precision and accuracy of animal nociception evaluation.
BACKGROUND: A von Frey filament (vFF) is a type of aesthesiometer usually made of nylon perpendicularly held in a base. It can be used in paw withdrawal pain threshold assessment, one of the most popular tests for pain evaluation using animal models. For this test, a set of filaments, each able to exert a different force, is applied to the animal paw, from the weakest to the strongest, until the paw is withdrawn. NEW METHOD: We made 20 low cost vFF using nylon filaments of different lengths and constant diameter glued perpendicularly to the ends of popsicle sticks. They were calibrated using a laboratory balance scale. Building and calibrating took around 4h and confirmed the theoretical prediction that the force exerted is inversely proportional to the length and directly proportional to the width of the filament. RESULTS: The calibration showed that they were precise and accurate. We analyzed the paw withdrawal threshold assessed with the set of home-made vFF and with a high quality commercial set of 5 monofilaments vFF (Stoelting, Wood Dale, USA) in two groups (n=5) of healthy mice. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: The home-made vFF precisely and accurately measured the hind paw withdrawal threshold (20.3±0.9 g). The commercial vFF have different diameters while our set has the same diameter avoiding the problem of lower sensitivity to larger diameter filaments. CONCLUSION: Building a set of vFF is easy, cost effective, and depending on the kind of tests, can increase precision and accuracy of animal nociception evaluation.
Authors: Michael L Oshinsky; Menka M Sanghvi; Christina R Maxwell; Dorian Gonzalez; Rebecca J Spangenberg; Marnie Cooper; Stephen D Silberstein Journal: Headache Date: 2012-09-10 Impact factor: 5.887
Authors: Isaac O Pérez-Martinez; Saul E Cifuentes-Mendiola; Diana L Solis-Suarez; Ana L García-Hernández Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2022-09-05 Impact factor: 2.064
Authors: Marcelo Victor Pires de Sousa; Cleber Ferraresi; Masayoshi Kawakubo; Beatriz Kaippert; Elisabeth Mateus Yoshimura; Michael R Hamblin Journal: Neurophotonics Date: 2016-01-25 Impact factor: 3.593
Authors: Diogo Casal; Eduarda Mota-Silva; Inês Iria; Sara Alves; Ana Farinho; Cláudia Pen; Nuno Lourenço-Silva; Luís Mascarenhas-Lemos; José Silva-Ferreira; Mário Ferraz-Oliveira; Valentina Vassilenko; Paula Alexandra Videira; João Goyri-O'Neill; Diogo Pais Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 3.240