Nafissa Telailia1, Sylvain Fisson2,3,4, Hacène Frih5. 1. Department of Biology, Faculty of Natural Science, University of Badji Mokhtar, Annaba, Algeria. Electronic Address: naffissa388@gmail.com. 2. National Institute of Health and Medical Research, Joint Research Unit_S951, Evry, France. 3. Genethon, National Institute of Health and Medical Research, Joint Research Unit_S951, Evry, France. 4. Joint Research Unit_S951, University of Evry Val d'Essonne, Evry, France. 5. Department of Biology, Faculty of Natural Science, University of Badji Mokhtar, Annaba, Algeria.
Neurological disorders may lead, directly or indirectly,
to pain with physiological and physical dimensions that
are both essential for its diagnosis and treatment. Daily,
pain sensation specifically is evoked by potential or
actual noxious (i.e., tissue-damaging) stimuli applied
to the body that differs from pain during disease that
occurs in the absence of external noxious stimuli (1).
“Pain is a mutually recognizable somatic experience that
reflects a person’s apprehension of threat to their bodily
or existential integrity” (2). This definition was qualified
by the Taxonomy Task Force of the association in 1994
(3) "Pain is always subjective. Each individual learns the
applications of the word through experiences relating to
injuries in early life" (4).There are three types of pain: acute physiological
nociceptive pain, pathophysiological nociceptive pain,
also called hyperalgesia and/or allodynia. Hyperalgesia is
an extreme pain intensity felt upon noxious stimulation,
and allodynia is the sensation of pain elicited by stimuli
that are normally below the pain threshold. The sensory
system itself can be damaged and become the source
of continuous pain. This type of pain is classified as
neuropathic. Chronic neuropathic pain has no physical
protective role as it continues without obvious ongoing
tissue damage. In contrast to nociceptive pain, which is
the result of stimulation of primary sensory nerves for
pain, neuropathic pain occurs when a lesion or disruption
of function occurs in the nervous system. If the cause
is located in the central nervous system (CNS) (brain
or spinal cord) it gives rise to central neuropathic pain,
and if it is located in the peripheral nervous system, it
gives rise to peripheral neuropathic pain. Neuropathic
pain may be induced by physical injuries of the nervous
system, such as surgery (5). Murine models of peripheral
nerve injury often target the sciatic nerve which is easy
to access, produces behavioral signs of neuropathic pain,
including mechanical allodynia (pain perception upon the
innocuous tactile stimuli) and hyperalgesia (exaggerated
pain sensations by mildly noxious stimuli). Sciatic nerve
chronic ligation (SN-CL) allows nociceptive tests on
the hind paws that end by studying of neuropathic pain
mechanism, pain sensory and for the study of neuropathic
pain, treatments using von Frey filaments (vFFs) test.
For this aim, sciatic nerve ligation was a target which
induces long-lasting mechanical allodynia (6, 7). This
last was measured by using vFFs, a highly sensitive
test in detecting allodynia in conditions likely to cause
neuropathic pain, and as soon as allodynia is established
in the animal, it is easily quantified (8) Von Frey test is
a pressure test to detect the perception of light touch. It
involves the use of a thin and flexible filament applied
to the skin with just enough force to induce a bend in the
filament (9). For best comparisons, prior sciatic nerve
ligation, we established baselines thresholds values that
represent the normal and the beginning thresholds level
of nociceptive measurements.Mechanical allodynia was assessed with the Von
Frey test, von Frey monofilaments were utilized for
the estimation of paw withdrawal threshold in both
hind paws as a measure of mechanical allodynia in our
peripheral neuropathic pain model. Hind paw withdrawal
thresholds were determined as a measure of ipsilateral
and contralateral mechanosensitivity for chronic sciatic
nerve ligation (SN-CL) and sham (SH) female rats by the
Simplified Up-and-Down Order (SUDO) method, which
is more recently developed.Studying behavioral signs of neuropathic pain in sciatic
nerve ligation model compared with SH rats (animal
underwent the same surgical procedures without seeing the
sciatic nerve ligation) using vFF test technique manually at
different days post-surgery was the aim of this study.
Materials and Methods
Biological material
In this experimental study, female rats White Wistar
Rats from the Pasteur Institute of Algiers were used in our
study as the biological material for the reason that female
are more sensitive to pain than males because of ovarian
hormones (10). Under the environmental conditions of
the experiment room (natural photoperiod, humidity,
temperature, etc.), the animals were kept in polyethylene
cages (8 female rats per cage), given 20 g of food per
female rat daily with ad libitum access to water.After an adaptation period of four weeks, 16 females
aged 3 months approximately were randomly selected,
they were with an average weight of 214.4 ± 6.389 g
and divided into two experimental groups (eight females
per group): the rates of the first group were underwent
ligation of sciatic nerve in the left hind paws, the second
group consists of SH rats (the animal underwent the
same surgical procedures without seeing the sciatic nerve
ligation in that paws). Contralateral hind paws were
always intact in the two groups. Rats weighted one day
prior to each test and five days after surgery to determine
antibiotic doses.All applicable international, national, and/or institutional
guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed
(D01N01UN230120150001).
Surgery procedure for sciatic nerve ligation
Anesthesia
Rats were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of
ketamine hydrochloride (5 mg∕Kg i.p., ketamine)+a drop
orally of chlorpromazine, and an ophthalmic ointment
was applied to the eyes of animals using a cotton swab
to avoid increased intra-ocular pressure (11) caused by
ketamine. The animals were placed in a calm and quiet
place until fully anesthetized. The reflex of rats was
checked by pinching the tip of the tail and legs with a pair
of tweezers to ensure the immobility of animals before
any surgery.
Surgery
According to (12) chronic constriction injury model,
surgical area (using an electric razor) was shaved. The
animal was placed on its right side, and the left hind
limb was put on a small platform in order to keep it
high. The leg was fixed with tape. The operative field
was disinfected with alternating scrubs of ethanol and
betadine outside the surgical site. The knee was located
with the thumb of the left hand, and a scalpel was used
to make an incision of few centimeters (cm) in the
proximal longitudinal direction of the knee. Then, the
skin was opened by blunt dissection using the tip of
a pair of sterilized scissors. The muscular layer was
separated by dissection just next to the visible blood
vessel, and we closed the femur (thigh bone). The
muscle layers were easily separated without bleeding
and then left sciatic nerve below the muscle was
revealed. The rat was placed under a stereomicroscope
to gently separate the muscles with a pair of tweezers
sterilized to visualize the sciatic nerve. The area and
the collateral saphenous branches of the sciatic nerve
were identified, knowing that the sural nerve is the
smallest of the three branches and three tight surgical
knots were created around the sciatic nerve. When the
first node was done, a contraction of paw’s muscle
groups supplied by the sciatic nerve that underwent
ligation was observed. After that, the suture ends were
cut with a pair of micro-scissors and the muscle layer
were gently closed. Finally, a drop of lidocaine was
added on the wound, and we sutured with surgical
knots. The SH control animals were anesthetized, skin
and muscles were cut to expose the nerve similar to the
ligated animals (except for the ligation). The skin was
sutured back to close the opened tissue. For the two
groups, contralateral hind paws were intact. SN-CL
and sham-operated animals were allowed to recover
for five days before testing in their ipsilateral and
contralateral hind paws.
Post-surgery period
The sufficiency of eye ointment was checked. Then,
the rat was placed in a clean cage under a paper towel
in a comfortable posture near to a heat source. Water
and food were easily accessible for the animal operated.
Finally, intraperitoneal injection of 75000 IU∕Kg∕day
of benzylpenicillin sodium (Algeria, Saidal, PEN G Panpharma) for five days after surgery was done.
Nociceptive behavioral test: Von Frey filaments test
In our study, standard esthesiometers set which
contains 20 nylon monofilaments have been used to
assess mechanical sensitivity. vFFs that are soft nylon
hairs of different lengths and calibrated diameters to
known forces, providing discrete units of pressure
and fixed on hand-held applicators (13) were used to
estimate hind paw withdrawal thresholds for SN-CL
and SH female rats. The enabling principle of the Von
Frey hair methodology for assessing skin sensitivity to
crude touch is that a hair (or a plastic monofilament)
will exert increasing pressure on the skin as it is
pressed harder and harder (14) before the filament
starts to bend. However, after bending, the vertical
force was constant. The force was directly proportional
to the stiffness, directly related to the thickness of
the filament and inversely proportional to its squared
length (15, 16). Prior to the second and the third tests,
two (2) minutes were sufficient for bending filaments
to be automatically calibrated and to be straight.The behavioral assessment was conducted by the
same person, time, location, and it was performed in
all animals before surgery (day 0), on days 6, 16 and
26 after SN-CL surgery or SH operation for the long
assessment of neuropathic pain behavioral signs. The
day of surgery was referred to as day1. The testing
chamber consisted of an (85×35×35) cm transparent
plastic box with wire mesh platform (0.5×0.5 cm grid
size) allowing access to the plantar surface of the hind
paws, and it was positioned over a support to keep it
elevated and to visualize the testing area (the midplantar surface just posterior to the footpads: This area
is innervated mostly by terminal branches of the sciatic
nerve). Each rat was placed in the testing chamber and
allowed to acclimate for 15 minutes prior to testing
or as soon as the rat stopped exploring and appeared
acclimatized to the testing environment and the Von
Frey hairs were inserted through the mesh to poke
the animal’s mid-plantar surface of hind paws, notice
that the rat was tested when it was standing quietly on
all four paws and was unaware of the experimenter’s
hand.
Assessment of temporal evolution of tactile paws
withdrawal thresholds in sciatic nerve chronic ligation
and sham rats
The values of tactical paw withdrawal thresholds in
SN-CL and SH rats was performed at basal (day 0), at
the 6th, 16th, and 26th days after surgeries in ipsilateral
and contralateral hind paws for both SN-CL and SH
control rats.
Measurement of mechanical hind paws withdrawal
threshold by the SUDO method
The hind paw withdrawal threshold was determined
using vFFs and was expressed in Millinewton (mN)
by the SUDO method which requires an empirically
determined filament force range and starts at the midrange filament for five consecutive touches (17). In
the current study, to assess rat hind paw mechanical
allodynia thresholds for SN-CL and sham-operated
rats, we started with the mid-range filament (2.0 g).
The filament was applied at a 90º angle for 2 seconds
to the mid-plantar surface just posterior to the footpads
of the left hind paw until it was just bent and then
withdrawn, the procedure was repeated five consecutive
times with an interval of 2 seconds between each
stimulation. The response was considered positive if
at least three expected responses were observed out of
five applications. The expected responses were: Paw
withdrawal, sudden flinching, and licking/biting of the
stimulated paw. The response was recorded as an “X”
for a positive response or an “O” if a negative response
was observed.If a positive response was reached on the first
examined filament, then the next lowest filament
was chosen. If no response was noted, then the next
higher filament was used. This process was repeated
until the first transition from the positive response
to negative one –or vice versa– was obtained, after
which force, was applied to the animal an additional
four times following the up and down paradigm. If the
last filament caused a response, a set value (0.5) was
added to the filament force, whereas if no response
was noted, the same value was subtracted from that
filament force and was designated as SUDO result.The force was determined from the newly designated
SUDO result:Filament force (mN)=0.0016×exp [(2.184 (-0.012
(SUDO result)2+0.429 (SUDO result)+1.359)].Once the threshold was determined for the left hind
paw, the same testing procedure was repeated on the right
hind paw. The baseline withdrawal thresholds of each
of the hind paws using von Frey hairs were determined
for each rat prior to surgical manipulation (day 0). To
assess the long-lasting mechanical allodynia, i.e., a
nociceptive response to a normally non-nociceptive
stimulus, measurement of the paw withdrawal threshold
was repeated next on days 6, 16 and then on day 26 after
SN-CL surgery or SH operation. The day of surgery was
referred to as day 1.
Mechanical hyperalgesia assessment
For hyperalgesia assessment: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 15,
and 26 g of vFFs were used until a filament induced
a positive response (18). If no filament elicited a
response, then the highest magnitude filament (26 g)
was recorded as the threshold.
Data analysis
Graphs were plotted using Graphpad Prism version
7. Statistical analyses were conducted with Past3. The
mean hind paw withdrawal thresholds were analyzed
using one-way ANOVA (Kruskal Wallis for more than
2 times, in one group between different times and Mann
Whitney for 2 times. Student’s t test, Fisher’s exact test,
D-test, and Chi ²-tests were used for comparisons between
or within groups of rats following one way ANOVA.
The mean (± standard error of the mean) hind paw
withdrawal thresholds values between different groups
of rats or within the same group at different time points
were considered significantly different with a P<0.05.
For mechanical hyperalgesia assessment, graphs were
plotted, and statistical analyses were conducted with the
Graph-Pad Prism software version 6.
Results
Assessment of temporal evolution of tactile paws
withdrawal thresholds in sciatic nerve chronic ligation
and sham rats
The values of ipsilateral paw withdrawal thresholds of SNCL rats are almost identical as illustrated in SH animals from
day 6 until day 16 post-surgery (Fig.1). After sixteen -days,
the paw withdrawal response in SN-CL remains reduced
until twenty -six days when compared with the SH group.
For contralateral paw withdrawal thresholds, in SH rats are
maintained reduced when compared with SN-CL ones from
the 6th to 26th day post-surgery (Fig.1, Table 1).
Fig.1
Temporal evolution of ipsilateral and contralateral mechanical paw
withdrawal thresholds in sciatic nerve chronic ligation and sham groups
(n=8).
Table 1
Sham animals time course of hind paws withdrawal thresholds
mean in basal (day 0), at 6th, 16th, and 26th days after surgery
Time (days)
Ipsilateral hind paws withdrawal thresholds mean (mN)
Contralateral hind paws withdrawal thresholds mean (mN)
0
54.13 ± 15.6
33.87 ± 12.64
6
20.45 ± 14.28
19.99 ± 14.25
16
6.548 ± 4.385
21.6 ±14.16
26
22.87 ± 13.84
12.59 ± 4.976
Data are presented as mean ± SE.
Temporal evolution of ipsilateral and contralateral mechanical paw
withdrawal thresholds in sciatic nerve chronic ligation and sham groups
(n=8).Sham animals time course of hind paws withdrawal thresholds
mean in basal (day 0), at 6th, 16th, and 26th days after surgeryData are presented as mean ± SE.
Sciatic nerve chronic ligation rats time course of hind
paws withdrawal thresholds mean in basal (day 0), at
6th, 16th and 26th days after surgery
In SN-CL rats, the ipsilateral mean paw withdrawal
thresholds were reduced in the injured (ipsilateral)
hind paw compared to the uninjured (contralateral)
hind paw from few days after surgery to the last day of
mechanical allodynia’s assessment, they were 20.06 ±
14.24, 7.22 ± 4.429, 13.50 ± 4.91 and 37.44 ± 17.65,
25.24 ± 3.985 and 19.22 ± 12.03 mN at the 6th, 16th, and
26th days after surgery, respectively in the ipsilateral
paw. In contrast, the mean paw withdrawal thresholds
the contralateral one were 7.22 ± 4.429, 37.44 ± 17.65,
19.22 ± 12.03 mM.Data showed that ipsilateral paw withdrawal
thresholds of nociceptive sensitivity were gradually
lowered from six until the 16th -day post-surgery, they
were varied from 63.91 ± 17 on day 0 to 13.50 ± 4.91
mN in the 16th-day post-surgery. In contrast, the mean
withdrawal thresholds were gradually increased to
25.24 ± 3.985 on day 26 after surgery. This variability
over time reached the significance from day 6
compared with the pre-operation (day 0) until day 26
(D-test P=0.0097 at 06 day, t test P=0.006 at 16 day,
F-test P=0.004 at 26 day).For contralateral nociceptive sensitivity, the mean
paw withdrawal thresholds were reduced over time,
they were varied from 52.32 ± 17.66 on day 0 to 19.22
± 12.03 mN on the 26st day post-surgery. This decrease
reached the significance from the 16th day compared
with the preoperative (day 0) until the 26th day (t-test
P=0.56 at 06 day, F-test P=0.00084 at 16th day, chi
²-test P=0.045 at the 26th day) (Fig.2A).
Fig.2
Repeated measurement of- ipsilateral and contralateral mechanical paw withdrawal threshold at 6th, 16th, and 26th days post- surgery in sciatic
nerve chronic ligation rats (n=8). Asterisks indicate the significant difference in paw withdrawal threshold. ns; Non significant, *; P<0.05 , and **; P<0.005.
The analysis of tactile withdrawal threshold using oneway ANOVA, lead to a loss of a significant difference
on day 0 (t test P=0.643) and at the 6th after surgery (t
test, P=0.45). In contrast, a statistically significant effect
of surgery (sciatic nerve ligation) was revealed at the
16th -and 26th days after surgery using Student’s t test
(P=0.009) and Fisher’s exact test (F=6.0081, P=0.03)
respectively (Fig.2B).Repeated measurement of- ipsilateral and contralateral mechanical paw withdrawal threshold at 6th, 16th, and 26th days post- surgery in sciatic
nerve chronic ligation rats (n=8). Asterisks indicate the significant difference in paw withdrawal threshold. ns; Non significant, *; P<0.05 , and **; P<0.005.
Assessment of mechanical ipsilateral allodynia in
sciatic nerve chronic ligation group in six, sixteen, and
twenty-six-day post-surgery
At six and sixteen days post-surgery, ipsilateral tactile
withdrawal threshold in SN-CL was not significantly
different from the SH group (t test, P=0.9). While, at
the 26th day after surgery, the mechanical sensitivity was
decreased significantly when analyzed by the Fisher’s
exact test (F=7.94, P=0.01, Fig.3).
Fig.3
Comparing tactile ipsilateral paw withdrawal threshold of sciatic
nerve chronic ligation (SN-CL) rats with sham (SH) group (n=8). Asterisks
indicate the significant difference in paw withdrawal threshold. *P<0.05.
Comparing tactile ipsilateral paw withdrawal threshold of sciatic
nerve chronic ligation (SN-CL) rats with sham (SH) group (n=8). Asterisks
indicate the significant difference in paw withdrawal threshold. *P<0.05.
Mechanical contralateral allodynia in sciatic nerve
chronic ligation rats compared with sham groups
Analysis of changes in sensory paw withdrawal
thresholds showed a statistically difference between
contralateral paw withdrawal thresholds in SN-CL and
SH rats using Fisher’s exact test (P=0.0006), (P=0.003)
and (P=0.03) at the 6th, 16th, and 26th days after surgery, respectively (Fig.4).
Fig.4
Graph showing compared mechanical contralateral allodynia in
sciatic nerve chronic ligation with sham rats at 6th, 16th, and 26th days
post- surgery (n=8 Wistar rats). Significant differences in paw withdrawal
threshold are indicated by asterisks. ns; Non significant, *; P<0.05, and
**; P<0.005.
Graph showing compared mechanical contralateral allodynia in
sciatic nerve chronic ligation with sham rats at 6th, 16th, and 26th days
post- surgery (n=8 Wistar rats). Significant differences in paw withdrawal
threshold are indicated by asterisks. ns; Non significant, *; P<0.05, and
**; P<0.005.
Hyperalgesia assessment in sciatic nerve chronic
ligation and sham rats
Comparing tactile contralateral paw withdrawal
thresholds mean in SN-CL rats (8.375 ± 1.133) with
SH group ones (10.38 ± 2.632) revealed a significant
difference (Fisher’s exact test, *P=0.0408, n=8) at the
16th-day post-surgery. However, at the 6th and the 26th
days after surgery, the means were higher in SNCL group
compared with SH one (14.38 ± 3.615 vs. 11.38 ± 3.520;
11.63 ± 3.495 vs 7.500 ± 2.771, n=8, respectively). For
ipsilateral paw withdrawal threshold, the mean paw
withdrawal thresholds in SNCL was increased at the 6th,
16th, and 26th days after surgery compared with SH rats
(13.50 ± 3.794 vs. 11.75 ± 4.199, 11.125 vs. 9.125, 7.5 vs.
6.875, n=8 respectively) (Fig.5).
Fig.5
Assessment of mechanical hyperalgesia in sciatic nerve chronic
ligation and sham groups at 6th, 16th, and 26th days after surgery. (n=8
Wistar rats). Asterisks indicate the significant difference in paw withdrawal
threshold. *; P<0.05.
Assessment of mechanical hyperalgesia in sciatic nerve chronic
ligation and sham groups at 6th, 16th, and 26th days after surgery. (n=8
Wistar rats). Asterisks indicate the significant difference in paw withdrawal
threshold. *; P<0.05.
Discussion
In this study, Von Frey monofilaments which are one
of the most non-invasive techniques were used. vFFs are
important tools for the study of mechanisms of cutaneous
stimulation-induced sensory input (19, 20). To study
peripheral neuropathic pain behavior, vFFs which have
been exploited for the precise measurement of mechanosensitivity in most vertebrates in pain research were used
(21-24). The filaments were applied at the mid-plantar
surface just posterior to the footpads since this area is
innervated mostly by terminal branches of the sciatic
nerve. Also, applying hairs of different force is done to
establish the paw withdrawal threshold (25).The baseline withdrawal thresholds of each of the hind
paws using von Frey hairs were determined for each rat
prior to surgical manipulation (day 0). The, unilateral
SN-CL of the left sciatic nerve was investigated to
assess behavioral signs of peripheral neuropathic pain;
however, it should be noted that many experimenters have
performed on the right sciatic nerve, with similar pain and
behavioral outcomes (26, 27). In this study, the behavioral
evaluation was performed on different post-surgical days
with an interval of ten days in SN-CL and SH rats in which
the left sciatic nerve was exposed but not manipulated
(28). On these days, the assessment of pain behavior was
performed using Von Frey monofilaments (which are used
in both preclinical and clinical assessment of allodynia).
There is a limited amount of literature related to the time
course measurement of mechanical allodynia using the
SUDO method for measuring mechanical allodynia in
SN-CL model of chronic neuropathic pain in contrast of
the up-and-down method and the first response method
for the reason that it was recently developed (29).The assessment of ipsilateral tactile paw withdrawal
thresholds showed that a transitory post-surgical
mechanical allodynia was observed in the SH group from
the 6th -day until 16th day post-surgery. In contrast, a longlasting ipsilateral mechanical allodynia was established
in SN-CL until twenty-six days after surgery. In the SH
group, transitory post-surgical contralateral allodynia was
created until day 12 after surgery, in contrast to a longlasting ipsilateral allodynia until day 22 post-surgery, an
assessment of contralateral allodynia was noted from day
22 to 26 post-surgery.In a SN-CL model, data indicate that ipsilateral allodynia
reached the day 6 after surgery and lasted until the 26th day
after surgery, the mechanical pain hypersensitivity was
maximal at the 16th -day when compared with ipsilateral
mean paw withdrawal thresholds in sham-operated rats.
In contrast, the contralateral allodynia appeared later on
day 16 postoperatively in SN-CL animals.At the 6th -day after surgery, the absence of significant
different determines the loss effect of sciatic nerve
ligation, demonstrating that neuropathy was not leaded.
In contrast, a very significant and significant statically
differences, which observed in day 16 and 26 post-surgery,
respectively showed that ipsilateral hind paw becomes
more sensitive and gets more pain hypersensitivity at the
sixteen-day, with a lower intensity of mechanical allodynia
at the twenty-six-day post-operatively witch validate that
SN-CL in rats seems to present significant quantitative
changes proportional to the external stimulation in
mechanical allodynia (30), demonstrated that in mice
model of neuropathic pain, neuropathy developed from
day 7 postoperatively and in most animals neuropathy,
was still observed until day 21-27 post-operatively.The primary outcome resulted from comparing
ipsilateral hind paw withdrawal threshold in SN-CL rats
with the SH group demonstrate that ipsilateral allodynia
became more intensive on day 16 explained by the loss
of sensations (31) resulted from sciatic nerve damage, the
mechanical ipsilateral allodynia lasted until day 26 after
surgery in SN-CL rats.When comparing contralateral mean hind paw
withdrawal thresholds of SN-CL rats with SH control
ones, the significant statically differences showed that
contralateral allodynia in SN-CL rats appeared on day 6
and lasted until day 26 postoperatively witch lead to an
extraterritorial development of neuropathic signs (32).For hyperalgesia assessment, data showed an absence of
ipsilateral hyperalgesia development at the different days
of mechanical paw withdrawal thresholds measurements
with the development of contralateral hyperalgesia in SNCL rats just at the 16th day after surgery.There are numerous problems with the use of
patients or healthy volunteers in pain research. We can
only use a modest stimulus that will not produce any
irreversible harm, and we also have to take into account
accompanying diseases, malingering, and the placebo
effect. It is also very difficult to recruit significant
numbers of patients needed for clinical trials. Therefore,
pain research is often conducted using animal models.
Examination of the pathogenesis of neuropathic pain
has been accelerated by the introduction of rodent
models of the nerve injury that produce behavior
indicative of spontaneous and inducible pain.We chose SN-CL as a chronic pain model that
made a significant contribution in understanding the
pathophysiological mechanisms in chronic pain, which is
quite distinct from acute noxious pain. The model produces
unilateral peripheral mononeuropathy, and it has been
observed that symptoms in this rat model correspond to
causalgia or complex regional pain syndrome in patients.
It induces allodynia in rodents and other symptoms which
are similar to those of neuropathic pain in humans.More work is needed for determination of the most
predictive animal models, removal of user bias and,
an introduction of more complex outcome measures
in behavioral tests. It is important to state that in pain
research, the problem is even more pronounced due to
the subjective nature of painful experience. Only humans
can express and describe the emotional aspect of a painful
experience.
Conclusion
Sciatic nerve ligation induces a long-lasting of
peripheral neuropathic pain signs with the absence of
ipsilateral hyperalgesia development.
Authors: Marcelo Victor Pires de Sousa; Cleber Ferraresi; Ana Carolina de Magalhães; Elisabeth Mateus Yoshimura; Michael R Hamblin Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2014-05-02 Impact factor: 2.390