Literature DB >> 24792106

Comparison of two different ultrasound methods of phacoemulsification.

Firat Helvacioglu1, Celal Yeter2, Sadik Sencan3, Zeki Tunc3, O Murat Uyar3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the safety and efficacy of microcoaxial phacoemulsification surgeries performed with the OZil Intelligent Phaco torsional mode (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, USA) and combined torsional/longitudinal ultrasound mode using 45 degree aperture angled tips.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized clinical trial.
METHODS: setting: Maltepe University, Istanbul. patient population: Eighty eyes of 80 cataract patients were randomly assigned to 2.2 mm microcoaxial phacoemulsification using the OZil Intelligent Phaco torsional mode (Group 1) or combined torsional/longitudinal ultrasound mode (Group 2). observation procedure: Intraoperative fluid and energy usage and postoperative examinations were evaluated. main outcome measures: Ultrasound time, cumulative dissipated energy, longitudinal and torsional ultrasound amplitudes, mean operation time, mean volume of fluid used, and surgical complications.
RESULTS: Both groups included 40 eyes. Mean ultrasound time, cumulative dissipated energy, and longitudinal and torsional ultrasound amplitudes in Group 1 were 58.21±33.81 seconds, 7.74±6.23, 0.45±0.30, and 26.30±12.60%, respectively, and these parameters in Group 2 were 64.75±30.23 seconds, 12.61±6.21, 26.32±5.85, and 40.98±8.33%, respectively. Cumulative dissipated energy and longitudinal and torsional amplitudes were found to be significantly lower in Group 1 (P=.001, P<.001, P<.001). Mean volumes of fluid used in Groups 1 and 2 were 73.30±19.87 cc and 107.07±21.82 cc, respectively (P<.001).
CONCLUSION: With the aid of a 45 degree aperture angled tip, the OZil Intelligent Phaco torsional mode provided more effective lens removal than the combined torsional/longitudinal ultrasound mode, with a lower cumulative dissipated energy and volume of fluid used.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24792106     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.04.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  4 in total

1.  Comparative clinical study of Whitestar Signature phacoemulsification system with standard and Ellips FX handpieces.

Authors:  Daniele Tognetto; Rossella D'Aloisio; Paolo Cecchini; Marta Di Nicola; Giuseppe Di Martino
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  A novel method to compare phacoemulsification parameters in vivo: two halves of one nucleus.

Authors:  Elena Tomilova; Sergey Shukhaev
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Comparison of 45-degree Kelman and 45-degree balanced phaco tip designs in torsional microcoaxial phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Süleyman Demircan; Mustafa Ataş; Emre Göktaş; Burhan Başkan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Comparisons of the energy efficiency and intraocular safety of two torsional phacoemulsification tips.

Authors:  Yan-Xiu Sun; Rong Cao; Zi-Yuan Liu; Hua-Qin Xia; Yu-Jie Cen; Lu Gao; Dan-Dan Shi
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 2.086

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.