| Literature DB >> 24790682 |
Eli Marie Grindedal1, Harald Aarset2, Inga Bjørnevoll2, Elin Røyset2, Lovise Mæhle1, Astrid Stormorken1, Cecilie Heramb1, Heidi Medvik1, Pål Møller3, Wenche Sjursen4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Using immunohistochemistry (IHC) to select cases for mismatch repair (MMR) genetic testing, we failed to identify a large kindred with the deleterious PMS2 mutation c.989-1G > T. The purpose of the study was to examine the sensitivity of IHC and microsatellite instability-analysis (MSI) to identify carriers of the mutation, and to estimate its penetrance and expressions.Entities:
Keywords: Expression; Immunohistochemistry; Lynch syndrome; Microsatellite instability; PMS2; Penetrance
Year: 2014 PMID: 24790682 PMCID: PMC4005455 DOI: 10.1186/1897-4287-12-12
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hered Cancer Clin Pract ISSN: 1731-2302 Impact factor: 2.857
Expression of cancers in carriers of c.989-1G > T
| Colorectum | 12 (54.5%) | 6 (46.2%) | 6 (66.7%) |
| Stomach | 3 (13.6%) | - | 3 (33.3%) |
| Kidney | 1 (4.5%) | 1 (7.7%) | - |
| Malignant melanoma | 1 (4.5%) | 1 (7.7%) | - |
| Sarcoma | 1 (4.5%) | 1 (7.7%) | - |
| Endometrium | - | 5 (38.5%) | - |
| Ovary | - | 1 (7.7%) | - |
| Breast | - | 3 (23.1%) | - |
| Prostate | - | - | 2 (22.2%) |
Figure 1Endometrial cancers in carriers of c.989-1G > T with and without expression of PMS2. IHC analysis of two adenocarcinomas of the endometrium. Immunhistochemical reaction shows expression (left) or no expression (right) of PMS2. Magnification × 20. Lymphocytes in the tumour sample provide positive control. Both tumours displayed MSI.
IHC/MSI profile according to type of cancer
| Colorectal | 11 | 9 | 2 | 9 | | 9 | |
| Gastric | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | | 1 | 1 |
| Endometrial | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | | 2 | 1 |
| Prostate | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | | | 1 |
| Ovarian | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | | 1 | |
| Breast | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Sarcoma | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | | 1 | |
| Renal | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | |
| Sum | 24 | 21 (87.5%) | 3 | 21 | 2 | 15 (71.4%) | 4 (19.0%) |
Figure 2Penetrance of cancers included in the Amsterdam clinical criteria.
Figure 3Penetrance of cancers included in the revised Amsterdam clinical criteria.
Figure 4Penetrance of cancers included in the Bethesda clinical criteria.
Figure 5Penetrance of any cancer.
Figure 6Penetrance of cancers that were either MSI-high or MSI-low.
Figure 7Penetrance of cancers that were MSI-high.