Literature DB >> 24363486

BIAS IN LINEAR MODEL POWER AND SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION DUE TO ESTIMATING NONCENTRALITY.

Douglas J Taylor1, Keith E Muller1.   

Abstract

Data analysts frequently calculate power and sample size for a planned study using mean and variance estimates from an initial trial. Hence power, or the sample size needed to achieve a fixed power, varies randomly. Such calculations can be very inaccurate in the General Linear Univariate Model (GLUM). Biased noncentrality estimators and censored power calculations create inaccuracy. Censoring occurs if only certain outcomes of an initial trial lead to a power calculation. For example, a confirmatory study may be planned (and a sample size estimated) only following a significant result in the initial trial. Computing accurate point estimates or confidence bounds of GLUM noncentrality, power, or sample size in the presence of censoring involves truncated noncentral F distributions. We recommend confidence bounds, whether or not censoring occurs. A power analysis of data from humans exposed to carbon monoxide demonstrates the substantial impact on sample size that may occur. The results highlight potential biases and should aid study planning and interpretation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  confidence bounds; effect size; noncentrality

Year:  1996        PMID: 24363486      PMCID: PMC3867307          DOI: 10.1080/03610929608831787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Commun Stat Theory Methods        ISSN: 0361-0926            Impact factor:   0.893


  4 in total

1.  Computing Confidence Bounds for Power and Sample Size of the General Linear Univariate Model.

Authors:  Douglas J Taylor; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Am Stat       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 8.710

2.  Power Calculations for General Linear Multivariate Models Including Repeated Measures Applications.

Authors:  Keith E Muller; Lisa M Lavange; Sharon Landesman Ramey; Craig T Ramey
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  1992-12-01       Impact factor: 5.033

Review 3.  Behavioral effects of carbon monoxide on animals and man.

Authors:  V G Laties; W H Merigan
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 13.820

4.  Effect of low level carbon monoxide on compensatory tracking and event monitoring.

Authors:  V A Benignus; K E Muller; C N Barton; J D Prah
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  1987 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.763

  4 in total
  8 in total

1.  The (Lack of) Replication of Self-Reported Mindfulness as a Mechanism of Change in Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention for Substance Use Disorders.

Authors:  Yu-Yu Hsiao; Davood Tofighi; Eric S Kruger; M Lee Van Horn; David P MacKinnon; Katie Witkiewitz
Journal:  Mindfulness (N Y)       Date:  2018-09-05

2.  BIAS IN LINEAR MODEL POWER AND SAMPLE SIZE DUE TO ESTIMATING VARIANCE.

Authors:  Keith E Muller; Virginia B Pasour
Journal:  Commun Stat Theory Methods       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 0.893

3.  Power calculation for overall hypothesis testing with high-dimensional commensurate outcomes.

Authors:  Yueh-Yun Chi; Matthew J Gribbin; Jacqueline L Johnson; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Some Distributions and Their Implications for an Internal Pilot Study With a Univariate Linear Model.

Authors:  Christopher S Coffey; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Commun Stat Theory Methods       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 0.893

5.  POWERLIB: SAS/IML Software for Computing Power in Multivariate Linear Models.

Authors:  Jacqueline L Johnson; Keith E Muller; James C Slaughter; Matthew J Gurka; Matthew J Gribbin; Sean L Simpson
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 6.440

6.  Properties of Doubly-Truncated Gamma Variables.

Authors:  Christopher S Coffey; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Commun Stat Theory Methods       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 0.893

7.  Examining replicability in addictions research: How to assess and ways forward.

Authors:  Matthew R Pearson; Frank J Schwebel; Dylan K Richards; Katie Witkiewitz
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2021-08-26

8.  Confidence regions for repeated measures ANOVA power curves based on estimated covariance.

Authors:  Matthew J Gribbin; Yueh-Yun Chi; Paul W Stewart; Keith E Muller
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 4.615

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.