Literature DB >> 24788491

Patient-reported outcome is influenced by surgical approach in total hip replacement: a study of the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register including 42,233 patients.

J V Lindgren1, P Wretenberg, J Kärrholm, G Garellick, O Rolfson.   

Abstract

The effects of surgical approach in total hip replacement on health-related quality of life and long-term pain and satisfaction are unknown. From the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, we extracted data on all patients that had received a total hip replacement for osteoarthritis through either the posterior or the direct lateral approach, with complete pre- and one-year post-operative Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). A total of 42 233 patients met the inclusion criteria and of these 4962 also had complete six-year PROM data. The posterior approach resulted in an increased mean satisfaction score of 15 (sd 19) vs. 18 (sd 22) (p < 0.001) compared with the direct lateral approach. The mean pain score was 13 (sd 17) vs. 15 (sd 19) (p < 0.001) and the proportion of patients with no or minimal pain was 78% vs. 74% (p < 0.001) favouring the posterior approach. The patients in the posterior approach group reported a superior mean EQ-5D index of 0.79 (sd 0.23) vs. 0.77 (sd 0.24) (p < 0.001) and mean EQ score of 76 (sd 20) vs. 75 (sd 20) (p < 0.001). All observed differences between the groups persisted after six years follow-up. Although PROMs after THR in general are very good regardless of surgical approach, the results indicate that some patients operated by the direct lateral approach report an inferior outcome compared with the posterior approach. The large number of procedures and the seemingly sustained differences make it likely these findings are clinically relevant.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EQ-5D; Health related quality of life; Hip arthroplasty; Hip replacement; Patient reported outcome; Register study; Surgical approach

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24788491     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B5.32341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  27 in total

1.  No decline in high patient satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty at long-term follow-up.

Authors:  P P Schmitz; J L C van Susante; A Hol; R Brokelman; C J M van Loon
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-06-01

2.  Does surgical approach influence mid- to long-term patient-reported outcomes after primary total hip replacement? A comparison of the 3 main surgical approaches.

Authors:  Romain Galmiche; Stéphane Poitras; Johanna Dobransky; Paul R Kim; Robert J Feibel; Wade Gofton; Hesham Abdelbary; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Comparison of clinical results and patient's satisfaction between direct anterior approach and Hardinge approach in primary total hip arthroplasty in a community hospital.

Authors:  C Trevisan; R Compagnoni; R Klumpp
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-04-27

4.  A comparison of the omega and posterior approaches on patient reported function and radiological outcomes following total hip replacement.

Authors:  James R Berstock; Ashley W Blom; Michael R Whitehouse
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-06-24

Review 5.  [Avulsion injuries of the gluteus medius and gluteus minimus muscles].

Authors:  P Weber; N Harrasser; V Twardy; H Gollwitzer; I J Banke
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Are younger patients undergoing THA appropriately characterized as active?

Authors:  James A Keeney; Ryan M Nunley; Geneva R Baca; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Lateral trochanteric pain following total hip arthroplasty: radiographic assessment of altered biomechanics as a potential aetiology.

Authors:  Ali Abdulkarim; Cathy Keegan; Raazi Bajwa; Eoin Sheehan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  Long-term (> 10 years) clinical outcomes of instrumented posterolateral fusion for spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  A M Lehr; D Delawi; J L C van Susante; N Verschoor; N Wolterbeek; F C Oner; M C Kruyt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Histological and ultrastructural degenerative findings in the gluteus medius tendon after hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mustafa Ibrahim; Urban Hedlundh; Ninni Sernert; Khaled Meknas; Lars Haag; Tomas Movin; Nikos Papadogiannakis; Jüri-Toomas Kartus
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Factors that shape the patient's hospital experience and satisfaction with lower limb arthroplasty: an exploratory thematic analysis.

Authors:  J V Lane; D F Hamilton; D J MacDonald; C Ellis; C R Howie
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.