Literature DB >> 24785973

Two-year comprehensive medical management of degenerative lumbar spine disease (lumbar spondylolisthesis, stenosis, or disc herniation): a value analysis of cost, pain, disability, and quality of life: clinical article.

Scott L Parker1, Saniya S Godil, Stephen K Mendenhall, Scott L Zuckerman, David N Shau, Matthew J McGirt.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Current health care reform calls for a reduction of procedures and treatments that are less effective, more costly, and of little value (high cost/low quality). The authors assessed the 2-year cost and effectiveness of comprehensive medical management for lumbar spondylolisthesis, stenosis, and herniation by utilizing a prospective single-center multidisciplinary spine center registry in a real-world practice setting.
METHODS: Analysis was performed on a prospective longitudinal quality of life spine registry. Patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis (n = 50), stenosis (n = 50), and disc herniation (n = 50) who had symptoms persisting after 6 weeks of medical management and who were eligible for surgical treatment were entered into a prospective registry after deciding on nonsurgical treatment. In all cases, comprehensive medical management included spinal steroid injections, physical therapy, muscle relaxants, antiinflammatory medication, and narcotic oral agents. Two-year patient-reported outcomes, back-related medical resource utilization, and occupational work-day losses were prospectively collected and used to calculate Medicare fee-based direct and indirect costs from the payer and societal perspectives. The maximum health gain associated with medical management was defined as the improvement in pain, disability, and quality of life experienced after 2 years of medical treatment or at the time a patient decided to cross over to surgery.
RESULTS: The maximum health gain in back pain, leg pain, disability, quality of life, depression, and general health state did not achieve statistical significance by 2 years of medical management, except for pain and disability in patients with disc herniation and back pain in patients with lumbar stenosis. Eighteen patients (36%) with spondylolisthesis, 11 (22%) with stenosis, and 17 (34%) with disc herniation eventually required surgical management due to lack of improvement. The 2-year improvement did not achieve a minimum clinically important difference in any outcome measure. The mean 2-year total cost (direct plus indirect) of medical management was $6606 for spondylolisthesis, $7747 for stenosis, and $7097 for herniation.
CONCLUSIONS: In an institution-wide, prospective, longitudinal quality of life registry that measures cost and effectiveness of all spine care provided, comprehensive medical management did not result in sustained improvement in pain, disability, or quality of life for patients with surgically eligible degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, stenosis, or disc herniation. From both the societal and payer perspective, continued medical management of patients with these lumbar pathologies in whom 6 weeks of conservative therapy failed was of minimal value given its lack of health utility and effectiveness and its health care costs. The findings from this real-world practice setting may more accurately reflect the true value and effectiveness of nonoperative care in surgically eligible patient populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EQ-5D = EuroQol-5D; MCS = mental component summary; NRS-BP = numeric rating scale for low-back pain; NRS-LP = NRS for leg pain; ODI = Oswestry Disability Index; PCS = physical component summary; QALY = quality-adjusted life-year; RCT = randomized controlled trial; SF-12 = Short Form 12-item Health Survey; lumbar spondylolisthesis; lumbar spondylosis; lumbar stenosis; medical management

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24785973     DOI: 10.3171/2014.3.SPINE1320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  26 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of three treatment strategies for lumbar spinal stenosis: Conservative care, laminectomy, and the Superion interspinous spacer.

Authors:  Scott L Parker; Louise H Anderson; Teresa Nelson; Vikas V Patel
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-09

Review 2.  The future of disc surgery and regeneration.

Authors:  Zorica Buser; Andrew S Chung; Aidin Abedi; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Bilateral Pars Defects at the L4 Vertebra Result in Increased Degeneration When Compared With Those at L5: An Anatomic Study.

Authors:  Peter T McCunniff; HoJun Yoo; Anthony Dugarte; Navkirat S Bajwa; Jason O Toy; Uri M Ahn; Nicholas U Ahn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Reoperation of decompression alone or decompression plus fusion surgeries for degenerative lumbar diseases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zhao Lang; Jing-Sheng Li; Felix Yang; Yan Yu; Kamran Khan; Louis G Jenis; Thomas D Cha; James D Kang; Guoan Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Minimally invasive techniques for lumbar decompressions and fusions.

Authors:  Ankur S Narain; Fady Y Hijji; Jonathan S Markowitz; Krishna T Kudaravalli; Kelly H Yom; Kern Singh
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-12

6.  Objective measurement of free-living physical activity (performance) in lumbar spinal stenosis: are physical activity guidelines being met?

Authors:  Justin Norden; Matthew Smuck; Aman Sinha; Richard Hu; Christy Tomkins-Lane
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Spine Pain and Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Defining the Contribution of Nonmalignant Etiologies.

Authors:  Lisa Marie Ruppert; Erica Dayan Cohn; Niamh M Keegan; Abigail Bacharach; Sungmin Woo; Theresa Gillis; Howard I Scher
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2022-02-17

8.  Trajectory of health-related quality of life and its determinants in patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery: a 1-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  En-Yuan Lin; Pin-Yuan Chen; Pei-Shan Tsai; Wen-Cheng Lo; Hsiao-Yean Chiu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Improvements in Back and Leg Pain After Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression.

Authors:  Dustin H Massel; Benjamin C Mayo; Dil V Patel; Daniel D Bohl; Philip K Louie; Gregory D Lopez; Kern Singh
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-02-22

10.  ISSLS Prize Winner: Consensus on the Clinical Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Results of an International Delphi Study.

Authors:  Christy Tomkins-Lane; Markus Melloh; Jon Lurie; Matt Smuck; Michele C Battié; Brian Freeman; Dino Samartzis; Richard Hu; Thomas Barz; Kent Stuber; Michael Schneider; Andrew Haig; Constantin Schizas; Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Anne F Mannion; Lukas Staub; Christine Comer; Luciana Macedo; Sang-Ho Ahn; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Danielle Sandella
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.